• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用慢性肾脏病触发工具确保安全和促进学习:东伦敦基层医疗中的定性评估。

Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.

机构信息

School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London.

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e715-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705497. Print 2019 Oct.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp19X705497
PMID:31455641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6713516/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An innovative programme to improve identification and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in primary care was implemented across three clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in 2016. This included a falling estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trigger tool built from data in the electronic health record (EHR). This tool notifies GP practices of falling eGFR values. By alerting clinicians to patients with possible CKD progression the tool invites clinical review, a referral option, and written reflection on management.

AIM

To identify practitioner perceptions of trigger tool use from interviews, and compare these with reflections on clinical management recorded within the tools.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A qualitative analysis set in 136 practices across East London during 2016-2018.

METHOD

Eight semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff were recorded, and thematic analysis was undertaken using framework analysis. The reflective comments recorded in the trigger tools of 1921 cases were categorised by age group, referral status, and by the drop in eGFR (>15 or >25 ml/min).

RESULTS

Three themes emerged from the interviews: getting started, patient safety, and trigger tools for learning. Well-organised practices found the tool was readily embedded into workflow and expressed greater motivation for using it. The tool was seen to support patient safety, and was used for learning about CKD management, both individually and as a practice. Reflective comments from 1921 trigger tools were reviewed. These supported the theme of patient safety. The free-text data, stratified by age, challenged the expectation that younger cases, at higher risk of progressive CKD, would have higher referral rates.

CONCLUSION

Building electronic trigger tools from the EHR can identify patients with a falling eGFR, prompting review of the eGFR trajectory and management plan. Interview and reflective data illustrated that practice use of the tool supports the patient safety agenda and encourages learning about CKD management.

摘要

背景

2016 年,三个临床委托组(CCG)实施了一项创新计划,以改善初级保健中慢性肾脏病(CKD)的识别和管理。这包括一个从电子健康记录(EHR)数据中构建的下降估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)触发工具。该工具通知 GP 实践下降的 eGFR 值。通过提醒临床医生注意可能进展为 CKD 的患者,该工具邀请进行临床审查、转诊选项,并对管理进行书面反思。

目的

通过访谈确定从业者对触发工具使用的看法,并将这些看法与工具中记录的临床管理反思进行比较。

设计和设置

2016-2018 年,在东伦敦的 136 个实践中进行了定性分析。

方法

记录了 8 名全科医生和实践工作人员的半结构化访谈,并使用框架分析进行了主题分析。对 1921 例病例的触发工具中记录的反思性评论进行了分类,按年龄组、转诊状态和 eGFR 下降(>15 或>25 ml/min)进行分类。

结果

访谈中出现了三个主题:开始、患者安全和触发工具学习。组织良好的实践发现该工具很容易嵌入工作流程,并表示更有动力使用它。该工具被认为支持患者安全,并用于学习 CKD 管理,无论是个人还是作为实践。审查了 1921 个触发工具的反思性评论。这些评论支持了患者安全的主题。按年龄分层的自由文本数据挑战了这样的预期,即年龄较小、进展性 CKD 风险较高的病例转诊率会更高。

结论

从 EHR 构建电子触发工具可以识别 eGFR 下降的患者,提示对 eGFR 轨迹和管理计划进行审查。访谈和反思性数据表明,该工具在实践中的使用支持患者安全议程,并鼓励学习 CKD 管理。

相似文献

1
Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.使用慢性肾脏病触发工具确保安全和促进学习:东伦敦基层医疗中的定性评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e715-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705497. Print 2019 Oct.
2
Do virtual renal clinics improve access to kidney care? A preliminary impact evaluation of a virtual clinic in East London.虚拟肾脏诊所是否能改善肾脏护理的可及性?东伦敦一家虚拟诊所的初步影响评估。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1682-6.
3
Improving care coordination between nephrology and primary care: a quality improvement initiative using the renal physicians association toolkit.改善肾脏病学和初级保健之间的护理协调:使用肾脏病医师协会工具包的质量改进计划。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jan;65(1):67-79. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.06.031. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
4
Using the electronic health record to build a culture of practice safety: evaluating the implementation of trigger tools in one general practice.利用电子健康记录建立实践安全文化:评估在一家普通诊所中实施触发工具的情况。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;68(669):e279-e285. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695489. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
A programme to spread eGFR graph surveillance for the early identification, support and treatment of people with progressive chronic kidney disease (ASSIST-CKD): protocol for the stepped wedge implementation and evaluation of an intervention to reduce late presentation for renal replacement therapy.一项旨在推广估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)图表监测以早期识别、支持和治疗进行性慢性肾脏病患者的项目(ASSIST-CKD):一项减少肾脏替代治疗延迟就诊干预措施的阶梯楔形实施与评估方案。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Apr 11;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0522-9.
6
General practitioners' perspectives on management of early-stage chronic kidney disease: a focus group study.全科医生对早期慢性肾脏病管理的观点:一项焦点小组研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 6;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0736-3.
7
Follow-up of Abnormal Estimated GFR Results Within a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Mixed-Methods Study.大型综合医疗服务系统中估算肾小球滤过率异常结果的随访:一项混合方法研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Nov;74(5):589-600. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
GPs' views on managing advanced chronic kidney disease in primary care: a qualitative study.全科医生对基层医疗中晚期慢性肾病管理的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Jul;65(636):e469-77. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685693.
9
Electronic Health Record Population Health Management for Chronic Kidney Disease Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.电子健康记录在慢性肾脏病管理中的应用:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Jul 1;184(7):737-747. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0708.
10
Improving coding and primary care management for patients with chronic kidney disease: an observational controlled study in East London.提高东伦敦慢性肾脏病患者的编码和初级保健管理水平:一项观察性对照研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e454-e461. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704105. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of trigger tools in primary care: A scoping review.初级保健中触发工具的开发与验证:一项范围综述
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0308906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308906. eCollection 2025.
2
Reducing short-acting beta-agonist overprescribing in asthma: lessons from a quality-improvement prescribing project in East London.减少哮喘患者中短效β受体激动剂的过度处方:来自东伦敦一项质量改进处方项目的经验教训。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jun 14;72(722):e619-26. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0725.
3
Quality improvement at scale: evaluation of the drivers and barriers to adoption and sustainability of an intervention to reduce late referral in chronic kidney disease.大规模质量改进:评估减少慢性肾脏病晚期转诊干预措施的采用和可持续性的驱动因素和障碍。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Nov;9(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001045.
4
Progress in using the electronic health record to improve primary care.利用电子健康记录改善初级保健的进展。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e215-e220. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708281. Print 2020 Mar.
5
Do virtual renal clinics improve access to kidney care? A preliminary impact evaluation of a virtual clinic in East London.虚拟肾脏诊所是否能改善肾脏护理的可及性?东伦敦一家虚拟诊所的初步影响评估。
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1682-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethnic differences in the progression of chronic kidney disease and risk of death in a UK diabetic population: an observational cohort study.英国糖尿病患者群体中慢性肾病进展及死亡风险的种族差异:一项观察性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 27;8(3):e020145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020145.
2
Using the electronic health record to build a culture of practice safety: evaluating the implementation of trigger tools in one general practice.利用电子健康记录建立实践安全文化:评估在一家普通诊所中实施触发工具的情况。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;68(669):e279-e285. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X695489. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
3
Patients' views on interactions with practitioners for type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal qualitative study in primary care over 10 years.患者对 2 型糖尿病医患互动的看法:一项长达 10 年的初级保健纵向定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan;68(666):e36-e43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693917. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
How do primary care doctors in England and Wales code and manage people with chronic kidney disease? Results from the National Chronic Kidney Disease Audit.英格兰和威尔士的初级保健医生如何对慢性肾脏病患者进行编码和管理?国家慢性肾脏病审计的结果。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1373-1379. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx280.
5
Acute kidney injury electronic alerts in primary care - findings from a large population cohort.基层医疗中的急性肾损伤电子警报 - 来自大型人群队列的研究结果。
QJM. 2017 Sep 1;110(9):577-582. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcx080.
6
A programme to spread eGFR graph surveillance for the early identification, support and treatment of people with progressive chronic kidney disease (ASSIST-CKD): protocol for the stepped wedge implementation and evaluation of an intervention to reduce late presentation for renal replacement therapy.一项旨在推广估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)图表监测以早期识别、支持和治疗进行性慢性肾脏病患者的项目(ASSIST-CKD):一项减少肾脏替代治疗延迟就诊干预措施的阶梯楔形实施与评估方案。
BMC Nephrol. 2017 Apr 11;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0522-9.
7
Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluation.了解一项旨在改善初级医疗保健中用药安全的技术干预措施的实施与采用情况:一项实在论评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 14;17(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2131-5.
8
Validity of estimated prevalence of decreased kidney function and renal replacement therapy from primary care electronic health records compared with national survey and registry data in the United Kingdom.与英国国家调查和登记数据相比,利用基层医疗电子健康记录评估肾功能下降和肾脏替代治疗患病率的有效性。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Apr 1;32(suppl_2):ii142-ii150. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw318.
9
Understanding tensions and identifying clinician agreement on improvements to early-stage chronic kidney disease monitoring in primary care: a qualitative study.了解基层医疗中早期慢性肾脏病监测改进方面的紧张关系并确定临床医生的共识:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 17;6(3):e010337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010337.
10
Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research.定性研究中的效度和信度问题。
Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Apr;18(2):34-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102054. Epub 2015 Feb 4.