• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导致临床事件的因素的定性分析

Qualitative analysis of factors leading to clinical incidents.

作者信息

Smith Matthew D, Birch Julian D, Renshaw Mark, Ottewill Melanie

机构信息

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(6):536-48. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2012-0029.

DOI:10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2012-0029
PMID:24003753
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the common themes leading or contributing to clinical incidents in a UK teaching hospital.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A root-cause analysis was conducted on patient safety incidents. Commonly occurring root causes and contributing factors were collected and correlated with incident timing and severity.

FINDINGS

In total, 65 root-cause analyses were reviewed, highlighting 202 factors implicated in the clinical incidents and 69 categories were identified. The 14 most commonly occurring causes (encountered in four incidents or more) were examined as a key-root or contributory cause. Incident timing was also analysed; common factors were encountered more frequently during out-hours--occurring as contributory rather than a key-root cause.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

In total, 14 commonly occurring factors were identified to direct interventions that could prevent many clinical incidents. From these, an "Organisational Safety Checklist" was developed to involve departmental level clinicians to monitor practice.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study demonstrates that comprehensively investigating incidents highlights common factors that can be addressed at a local level. Resilience against clinical incidents is low during out-of-hours periods, where factors such as lower staffing levels and poor service provision allows problems to escalate and become clinical incidents, which adds to the literature regarding out-of-hours care provision and should prove useful to those organising hospital services at departmental and management levels.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估导致英国一家教学医院临床事故的常见主题或促成因素。

设计/方法/途径:对患者安全事故进行了根本原因分析。收集了常见的根本原因和促成因素,并将其与事故发生时间和严重程度相关联。

研究结果

共审查了65份根本原因分析,突出了202个与临床事故相关的因素,并确定了69个类别。对14个最常见的原因(在四起或更多起事故中出现)作为关键根本原因或促成原因进行了研究。还分析了事故发生时间;常见因素在非工作时间出现的频率更高——作为促成原因而非关键根本原因。

实际意义

共确定了14个常见因素,以指导可预防许多临床事故的干预措施。据此制定了一份“组织安全检查表”,让科室层面的临床医生参与监督实践。

原创性/价值:本研究表明,对事故进行全面调查能突出可在地方层面解决的常见因素。非工作时间对临床事故的应对能力较低,此时人员配备水平较低和服务提供不佳等因素会使问题升级为临床事故,这为有关非工作时间护理服务的文献增添了内容,对在科室和管理层面组织医院服务的人员应具有参考价值。

相似文献

1
Qualitative analysis of factors leading to clinical incidents.导致临床事件的因素的定性分析
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(6):536-48. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2012-0029.
2
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
3
Embedding learning from adverse incidents: a UK case study.从不良事件中进行嵌入式学习:英国的一个案例研究。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Apr 18;30(3):216-223. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2016-0060.
4
Unit-based incident reporting and root cause analysis: variation at three hospital unit types.基于科室的事件报告与根本原因分析:三种医院科室类型的差异
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 21;6(6):e011277. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011277.
5
Systems analysis of voluntary reported anaesthetic safety incidents occurring in a university teaching hospital.对某大学教学医院发生的自愿报告麻醉安全事件的系统分析。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2018 Jan;45(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
6
Aggregate analysis of sentinel events as a strategic tool in safety management can contribute to the improvement of healthcare safety.将哨点事件进行汇总分析作为安全管理中的一项战略工具,有助于改善医疗安全。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Mar 1;31(2):110-116. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy116.
7
Patient safety incidents associated with tracheostomies occurring in hospital wards: a review of reports to the UK National Patient Safety Agency.与医院病房中发生的气管切开术相关的患者安全事件:对英国国家患者安全局报告的审查。
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Sep;86(1019):522-5. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.094706. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
8
Patient safety incidents associated with obesity: a review of reports to the National Patient Safety Agency and recommendations for hospital practice.肥胖相关的患者安全事件:国家患者安全局报告回顾及医院实践建议。
Postgrad Med J. 2011 Oct;87(1032):694-9. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2010.106989. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
9
Differences between serious and nonserious patient safety incidents in the largest hospital district in Finland.芬兰最大医院区严重与非严重患者安全事件之间的差异。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Oct;38(2):27-35. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21310. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
10
Learning from Taiwan patient-safety reporting system.借鉴台湾地区的患者安全报告制度。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):834-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of hospital cost drivers using sparse group lasso.使用稀疏群组套索法识别医院成本驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204300. eCollection 2018.