Hadar Eran, Yogev Yariv
*Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva; †Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;56(4):758-73. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182a8e08e.
The various strategies to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), starting from O'sullivan, followed by numerous opinions and recommendations and up to the recently published International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria, have been and still are the subject of extensive and ongoing debate, since the 1960s, and holding, fiercely than ever, nowadays. In this review we shall provide an overlook on the history of GDM diagnosis, concentrating on the interpretation of the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome results into clinical guidelines, and the pros and cons for changing the criteria for GDM diagnosis.
从奥沙利文开始，到众多观点和建议，再到最近发布的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组标准，诊断妊娠期糖尿病（GDM）的各种策略自20世纪60年代以来一直是广泛且持续争论的主题，如今争论比以往任何时候都更加激烈。在本综述中，我们将概述GDM诊断的历史，重点关注高血糖和不良妊娠结局结果在临床指南中的解读，以及改变GDM诊断标准的利弊。
