Suppr超能文献

将HAPO研究转化为妊娠期糖尿病的新诊断标准?从HAPO到国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG),再回到奥沙利文标准。

Translating the HAPO study into new diagnostic criteria for GDM? From HAPO to IADPSG and back to O'Sullivan.

作者信息

Hadar Eran, Yogev Yariv

机构信息

*Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva; †Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;56(4):758-73. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182a8e08e.

Abstract

The various strategies to diagnose gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), starting from O'sullivan, followed by numerous opinions and recommendations and up to the recently published International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups criteria, have been and still are the subject of extensive and ongoing debate, since the 1960s, and holding, fiercely than ever, nowadays. In this review we shall provide an overlook on the history of GDM diagnosis, concentrating on the interpretation of the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome results into clinical guidelines, and the pros and cons for changing the criteria for GDM diagnosis.

摘要

从奥沙利文开始,到众多观点和建议,再到最近发布的国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组标准,诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的各种策略自20世纪60年代以来一直是广泛且持续争论的主题,如今争论比以往任何时候都更加激烈。在本综述中,我们将概述GDM诊断的历史,重点关注高血糖和不良妊娠结局结果在临床指南中的解读,以及改变GDM诊断标准的利弊。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验