Suppr超能文献

不同类型清髓性预处理方案的成人急性白血病患者行单份或双份脐带血移植的结局比较:欧洲血液与骨髓移植协作组和欧洲骨髓移植协作组急性白血病工作组的回顾性研究。

Comparison of outcomes after single or double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia using different types of myeloablative conditioning regimen, a retrospective study on behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT.

机构信息

1] Eurocord, Hôpital Saint Louis, AP-HP, and IUH University Paris VII, Paris, France [2] Rome Transplant Network, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.

Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Leukemia. 2014 Apr;28(4):779-86. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.259. Epub 2013 Sep 5.

Abstract

We report outcomes after single (s) and double (d) umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) after myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen for 239 patients transplanted for acute leukemia in first complete remission (CR1). All sUCBT patients received a total nucleated cell dose >2.5 × 10(7)/kg. Conditioning regimen for sUCBT was total body irradiation (TBI)12 Gy- or busulfan (BU)-based ± fludarabine (Flu) (n=68, group 1), thiotepa+BU+Flu (TBF) (n=88, group 2), and for dUCBT it was TBI12 Gy+cyclophosphamide ± Flu (n=83, group 3). dUCBT recipients were younger, received higher cell dose and less frequently antithymocyte globulin. In multivariate analysis, we found similar neutrophil recovery among the three groups; however, acute graft-versus-host disease II-IV was higher in dUCBT compared with others. Non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence were not statistically different among the three groups. Leukemia-free survival was 30% for sUCBT using TBI- or BU-based MAC compared with 48% for sUCBT TBF and 48% for dUCBT (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), and it was not statistically different between sUCBT with TBF and dUCBT. In conclusion, use of sUCBT with adequate cell dose (>2.5 × 10(7)/kg) and a specific conditioning regimen in the MAC setting results in similar outcomes as dUCBT. The choice of TBF conditioning regimen for sUCBT may improve results, and whether this regimen may be effective in dUCBT should be further analyzed.

摘要

我们报告了 239 例接受清髓性预处理方案(MAC)后单份(s)和双份(d)脐带血移植(UCBT)治疗的急性白血病患者在首次完全缓解(CR1)后的结果。所有 sUCBT 患者均接受了>2.5×10(7)/kg 的总核细胞剂量。sUCBT 的预处理方案为全身照射(TBI)12Gy 或基于白消安(BU)±氟达拉滨(Flu)(n=68,组 1)、噻替哌+BU+Flu(TBF)(n=88,组 2),dUCBT 的预处理方案为 TBI12Gy+环磷酰胺±Flu(n=83,组 3)。dUCBT 受者年龄较小,接受的细胞剂量更高,抗胸腺细胞球蛋白的应用频率更低。多变量分析显示,三组的中性粒细胞恢复情况相似;然而,dUCBT 组的 II-IV 级急性移植物抗宿主病发生率高于其他两组。三组之间非复发死亡率和复发率无统计学差异。TBI 或 BU 为基础的 MAC 方案的 sUCBT 的无白血病生存率为 30%,而 TBF 的 sUCBT 为 48%,dUCBT 为 48%(P=0.02 和 P=0.03),TBF 的 sUCBT 与 dUCBT 之间无统计学差异。总之,在 MAC 方案中,使用足够细胞剂量(>2.5×10(7)/kg)和特定预处理方案的 sUCBT 可获得与 dUCBT 相似的结果。TBF 预处理方案可能会改善 sUCBT 的结果,而该方案是否在 dUCBT 中有效,尚需进一步分析。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验