GIGA and CHU of Liege, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Department of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Blood Cancer J. 2019 Apr 12;9(4):46. doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0204-x.
The role of umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with active disease at allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains poorly investigated. In this study, we compared transplantation outcomes of 2963 patients with primary refractory or relapsed AML given CBT, 10/10 HLA-matched UD, or 9/10 HLA-matched UD allo-HCT from 2004 to 2015 at EBMT-affiliated centers. Neutrophil engraftment and complete remission rates in CBT, UD 10/10, and UD 9/10 recipients were 75 and 48%, 93 and 69%, and 93 and 70%, respectively. In multivariate Cox analyses, in comparison with CBT (n = 285), UD 10/10 recipients (n = 2001) had a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.7, P = 0.001), a lower incidence of non relapse mortality (HR = 0.6, P < 0.001), better GVHD-free and leukemia-free survival (GRFS, HR = 0.8, P < 0.001) and better survival (HR = 0.6, P < 0.001). Further, in comparison with CBT, 9/10 UD recipients (n = 677) also had a lower incidence of relapse (HR = 0.8, P = 0.02), a lower incidence of nonrelapse mortality (HR = 0.7, P = 0.008), better GRFS (HR = 0.8, P = 0.01) and better survival (HR = 0.7, P < 0.001). In summary, these data suggest that in AML patients with active disease at transplantation, allo-HCT with UD results in better transplantation outcomes than CBT.
在异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)时疾病处于活动状态的急性髓系白血病(AML)患者中,脐带血移植(CBT)的作用仍未得到充分研究。在这项研究中,我们比较了 2004 年至 2015 年期间,在 EBMT 附属中心接受 CBT、10/10 HLA 匹配的 UD 或 9/10 HLA 匹配的 UD allo-HCT 的 2963 例原发性难治或复发 AML 患者的移植结果。在 CBT、UD 10/10 和 UD 9/10 受者中,中性粒细胞植入和完全缓解率分别为 75%和 48%、93%和 69%以及 93%和 70%。在多变量 Cox 分析中,与 CBT(n=285)相比,UD 10/10 受者(n=2001)的复发率较低(HR=0.7,P=0.001),非复发死亡率较低(HR=0.6,P<0.001),GVHD 无复发生存和白血病无复发生存(GRFS,HR=0.8,P<0.001)和总生存(HR=0.6,P<0.001)较好。此外,与 CBT 相比,9/10 UD 受者(n=677)的复发率也较低(HR=0.8,P=0.02),非复发死亡率较低(HR=0.7,P=0.008),GRFS 较好(HR=0.8,P=0.01),总生存较好(HR=0.7,P<0.001)。总之,这些数据表明,在移植时疾病处于活动状态的 AML 患者中,与 CBT 相比,UD allo-HCT 可获得更好的移植结果。