Klein R C, Party E, Gershey E L
Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10021-6399.
Biotechniques. 1990 Aug;9(2):196-9.
Examination gloves worn for protection from biohazards were sampled and evaluated for their ability to exclude virus particles. We found that thin gloves manufactured from polyethylene or polyvinyl chloride are ineffective barriers while gloves of thin latex are superior but not without failure. Polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride gloves had failure rates of 40% and 22%, respectively. Following exposure to the common disinfectant, 70% ethanol, these failure rates increased to 94% and 56% for polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride gloves, respectively. Latex, although permeable to ethanol, was penetrated by virus less than 1% of the time regardless of whether the latex had been pre-exposed to disinfectant or not. This study highlights the need for caution on the part of those who rely upon examination gloves for protection from infectious agents as well as the need for establishing more adequate standards and testing procedures for their manufacture.
对用于防护生物危害的检查手套进行了采样,并评估了它们排除病毒颗粒的能力。我们发现,由聚乙烯或聚氯乙烯制成的薄手套是无效的屏障,而薄乳胶手套则更胜一筹,但也并非万无一失。聚乙烯和聚氯乙烯手套的失败率分别为40%和22%。在接触常见消毒剂70%乙醇后,聚乙烯和聚氯乙烯手套的这些失败率分别增至94%和56%。乳胶虽然可渗透乙醇,但无论乳胶是否预先接触过消毒剂,病毒穿透乳胶的时间都不到1%。这项研究凸显了依赖检查手套防护传染因子的人员需要谨慎,同时也需要为手套制造制定更完善的标准和测试程序。