• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并多机构验证用于 Gleason 6 前列腺癌升级风险的工具。

Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3992-4002. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28303. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.28303
PMID:24006289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880351/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PC) who are diagnosed with Gleason score 6 at biopsy are ultimately found to harbor higher grade PC (Gleason ≥ 7) at radical prostatectomy. This finding increases risk of recurrence and cancer-specific mortality. Validated clinical tools that are available preoperatively are needed to improve the ability to recognize likelihood of upgrading in patients with low-risk PC.

METHODS

More than 30 clinicopathologic parameters were assessed in consecutive patients with Gleason 6 PC upon biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy. A nomogram for predicting upgrading (Gleason ≥ 7) on final pathology was generated using multivariable logistic regression in a development cohort of 431 patients. External validation was performed in 2 separate cohorts consisting of 1151 patients and 392 patients. Nomogram performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration, and decision analysis.

RESULTS

On multivariable analysis, variables predicting upgrading were prostate-specific antigen density using ultrasound (odds ratio [OR] = 229, P = .003), obesity (OR = 1.90, P = .05), number of positive cores (OR = 1.23, P = .01), and maximum core involvement (OR = 0.02, P = .01). On internal validation, the bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy was 0.753. External validation revealed a predictive accuracy of 0.677 and 0.672. The nomogram demonstrated excellent calibration in all 3 cohorts and decision curves demonstrated high net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. The nomogram demonstrated areas under the curve of 0.597 to 0.672 for predicting upgrading in subsets of men with very low-risk PC who meet active surveillance criteria (all P < .001), allowing further risk stratification of these individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

A nomogram was developed and externally validated that uses preoperative clinical parameters and biopsy findings to predict the risk of pathological upgrading in Gleason 6 patients. This can be used to further inform patients with lower risk PC who are considering treatment or active surveillance.

摘要

背景

许多经活检诊断为 Gleason 评分 6 的低危前列腺癌(PC)患者,在接受根治性前列腺切除术时最终被发现存在更高等级的 PC(Gleason≥7)。这一发现增加了复发和癌症特异性死亡的风险。需要术前使用经过验证的临床工具来提高识别低危 PC 患者升级可能性的能力。

方法

对经活检诊断为 Gleason 6 PC 且接受根治性前列腺切除术的连续患者进行了 30 多项临床病理参数评估。在一个包含 431 例患者的开发队列中,使用多变量逻辑回归生成预测最终病理升级(Gleason≥7)的列线图。在两个独立的队列中进行了外部验证,包括 1151 例患者和 392 例患者。使用接收者操作特征曲线、校准和决策分析评估列线图的性能。

结果

多变量分析中,预测升级的变量包括超声前列腺特异性抗原密度(比值比 [OR] = 229,P =.003)、肥胖(OR = 1.90,P =.05)、阳性核心数(OR = 1.23,P =.01)和最大核心受累(OR = 0.02,P =.01)。内部验证中,bootstrap 校正后的预测准确性为 0.753。外部验证显示预测准确性分别为 0.677 和 0.672。列线图在所有 3 个队列中均表现出良好的校准,决策曲线在广泛的阈值概率范围内显示出较高的净收益。列线图在满足主动监测标准的低危 PC 患者亚组中预测升级的曲线下面积为 0.597 至 0.672(所有 P 值均<.001),从而可以进一步对这些个体进行风险分层。

结论

开发并外部验证了一个列线图,该列线图使用术前临床参数和活检发现来预测 Gleason 6 患者发生病理升级的风险。这可以帮助进一步告知考虑治疗或主动监测的低危 PC 患者。

相似文献

1
Development and multi-institutional validation of an upgrading risk tool for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.开发并多机构验证用于 Gleason 6 前列腺癌升级风险的工具。
Cancer. 2013 Nov 15;119(22):3992-4002. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28303. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
2
A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.一种用于确定Gleason 6级升级风险的活检综合算法可对前列腺癌主动监测失败风险进行分层。
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):729-735. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1933-0. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
A nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading of clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer among Chinese patients.用于预测中国患者临床诊断的局限性前列腺癌Gleason评分升级的列线图。
Chin J Cancer. 2014 May;33(5):241-8. doi: 10.5732/cjc.013.10137. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
4
Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.开发并内部验证一种新型模型,以确定前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
5
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.基于当代多核心前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原与前列腺特异性抗原密度对诊断为 Gleason 6 前列腺癌患者升级的预测作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
6
Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.预测前列腺穿刺活检与根治性前列腺切除术后病理结果之间前列腺癌Gleason评分升级概率的列线图的开发与内部验证。
Eur Urol. 2006 May;49(5):820-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
7
Combined multiple clinical characteristics for prediction of discordance in grade and stage in prostate cancer patients undergoing systematic biopsy and radical prostatectomy.综合多种临床特征预测前列腺癌患者行系统穿刺活检和根治性前列腺切除术时分级和分期的差异。
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Nov;216(11):153235. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153235. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.预测根治性前列腺切除术后复发性前列腺癌男性的生存率。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
9
Predicting the risk of harboring high-grade disease for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer scored as Gleason ≤ 6 on biopsy cores.预测活检核心评分为Gleason≤6的前列腺癌患者患有高级别疾病的风险。
World J Urol. 2015 Jun;33(6):787-92. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1348-8. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.对于接受广泛经直肠超声引导活检方案诊断的低危前列腺癌患者,单侧阳性活检并不能预测根治性前列腺切除术后的单侧前列腺癌。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10762.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing Gleason score up/downgrade in radical prostatectomy.影响前列腺癌根治术中Gleason评分上调/下调的因素。
BMC Urol. 2025 Jul 4;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01848-x.
2
Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of grade group 1 prostate cancer.活检诊断为1级前列腺癌患者中Gleason评分升级的预测因素。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 28;55(1):231-236. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5962. eCollection 2025.
3
Correlation analysis and recurrence evaluation system for patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis: a multicentre retrospective study.复发性肝内胆管结石患者的相关性分析及复发评估系统:一项多中心回顾性研究
Front Digit Health. 2024 Nov 27;6:1510674. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1510674. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检至根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分升级的危险因素。
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):981-996. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
5
Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients.对比前列腺认知融合靶向活检和根治性前列腺切除术的组织学表现:探究中国患者 Gleason 评分升级的风险因素。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):18029-18037. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05506-3. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
6
Active Surveillance for Taiwanese Men with Localized Prostate Cancer: Intermediate-Term Outcomes and Predictive Factors.对台湾局限性前列腺癌男性患者的主动监测:中期结果及预测因素
World J Mens Health. 2024 Jul;42(3):587-599. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.230107. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
The CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 Prognostic Model Is Significantly Associated with Adverse Post-Surgical Pathology Outcomes.CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9预后模型与术后不良病理结果显著相关。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Dec 30;15(1):262. doi: 10.3390/cancers15010262.
8
TRUS-Guided Target Biopsy for a PI-RADS 3-5 Index Lesion to Reduce Gleason Score Underestimation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.经直肠超声引导下对PI-RADS 3-5类索引病变进行靶向活检以减少Gleason评分低估:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 24;11:824204. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.824204. eCollection 2021.
9
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
10
Clinical significance and risk factors of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade upgrading in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.前列腺癌患者行机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级升级的临床意义和危险因素。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 4;21(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08248-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance (PRIAS).适合主动监测的前列腺癌根治术患者的结局分析(PRIAS)。
BJU Int. 2013 Jan;111(1):53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11276.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
2
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.基于当代多核心前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原与前列腺特异性抗原密度对诊断为 Gleason 6 前列腺癌患者升级的预测作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
Pathologic prostate cancer characteristics in patients eligible for active surveillance: a head-to-head comparison of contemporary protocols.适合主动监测的患者的前列腺癌病理学特征:当代方案的头对头比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
4
Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades.从前列腺穿刺活检到根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌升级和降级:使用改良的 Gleason 分级系统和考虑三级分级的发生率和预测因素。
Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):1019-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
5
Smaller prostate gland size and older age predict Gleason score upgrading.前列腺体积较小和年龄较大与格里森评分升级相关。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1033-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.11.032. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
6
Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer.前列腺体积大小可预测低危前列腺癌患者 Gleason 评分升级。
J Urol. 2011 Dec;186(6):2221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.104. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
7
Clinically significant Gleason sum upgrade: external validation and head-to-head comparison of the existing nomograms.临床显著的格里森总和升级:现有列线图的外部验证和头对头比较。
Cancer. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):378-85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26306. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
8
Small prostate size and high grade disease--biology or artifact?前列腺体积小且疾病级别高——是生物学现象还是人为假象?
J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2108-11. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.053. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
9
Obesity and prostate cancer aggressiveness among African and Caucasian Americans in a population-based study.基于人群的研究中非洲裔美国人和白种人美国人的肥胖与前列腺癌侵袭性
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 May;20(5):844-53. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0684. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
10
Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.主动监测前列腺癌计划:约翰霍普金斯经验的更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2185-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112. Epub 2011 Apr 4.