• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检至根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分升级的危险因素。
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):981-996. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度预测初始前列腺活检和前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分升级的能力随着肿瘤分级的增加而降低,这是由于单位肿瘤体积的 PSA 分泌减少所致。
BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
3
Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in a large African-American population.在一个大型非裔美国人人群中,预测格里森评分升级的因素。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2013 Oct;45(5):1257-62. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0495-y. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
4
Predictors for clinically relevant Gleason score upgrade in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.接受根治性前列腺切除术患者中临床相关 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10187.x. Epub 2011 May 18.
5
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
The presence of chronic inflammation in positive prostate biopsy is associated with upgrading in radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检中存在慢性炎症与根治性前列腺切除术后的升级有关。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2021 Sep 30;93(3):280-284. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2021.3.280.
7
Extended prostate biopsy scheme improves reliability of Gleason grading: implications for radiotherapy patients.扩展前列腺活检方案提高了 Gleason 分级的可靠性:对放疗患者的影响
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jun 1;59(2):386-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.014.
8
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.活检组织条数量是低风险前列腺癌患者临床显著 Gleason 评分升级的最重要预测因素之一。
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1087-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.048. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.基于磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原密度的风险分层,可能会减少接受低风险前列腺癌主动监测的男性不必要的后续活检程序。
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
10
Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前列腺癌根治术后 Gleason 评分升级的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol Int. 2023;107(5):460-479. doi: 10.1159/000528873. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
ISUP grade upgrade prediction after radical prostatectomy: Role of Luteinizing Hormone to Testosterone ratio.根治性前列腺切除术后国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级升级预测:促黄体生成素与睾酮比值的作用
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jul 14;6(7):e70043. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70043. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌的过度诊断与过度治疗
Diseases. 2025 May 24;13(6):167. doi: 10.3390/diseases13060167.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2024.2024年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21820. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients.对比前列腺认知融合靶向活检和根治性前列腺切除术的组织学表现:探究中国患者 Gleason 评分升级的风险因素。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(20):18029-18037. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05506-3. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
3
Individual risk prediction of high grade prostate cancer based on the combination between total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and free to total PSA ratio.基于总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和游离 PSA 与总 PSA 比值的联合,对高级别前列腺癌进行个体风险预测。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Jan 27;61(7):1327-1334. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2023-0008. Print 2023 Jun 27.
4
Technological advancements in cancer diagnostics: Improvements and limitations.癌症诊断技术的进步:改进与局限。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Feb;6(2):e1764. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1764. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
5
Racial disparities in Black men with prostate cancer: A literature review.黑人男性前列腺癌中的种族差异:文献综述。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3787-3795. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34433. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.22特征基因组分类器与前列腺癌主动监测期间活检Gleason分级升级之间的关联
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Feb 11;37:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.008. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
A non-inferiority comparative analysis of micro-ultrasonography and MRI-targeted biopsy in men at risk of prostate cancer.微超声与 MRI 靶向活检在前列腺癌高危男性中的非劣效性比较分析。
BJU Int. 2022 May;129(5):648-654. doi: 10.1111/bju.15635. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
Optimization of prostate biopsy - Micro-Ultrasound versus MRI (OPTIMUM): A 3-arm randomized controlled trial evaluating the role of 29 MHz micro-ultrasound in guiding prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.前列腺活检优化——微型超声与磁共振成像对比研究(OPTIMUM):一项三臂随机对照试验,评估29兆赫微型超声在临床怀疑前列腺癌男性患者前列腺活检引导中的作用。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106618. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106618. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
9
Combination MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy may overestimate gleason grade on final surgical pathology and impact risk stratification.联合 MRI 靶向和系统前列腺活检可能高估最终手术病理的 Gleason 分级,并影响风险分层。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;40(2):59.e1-59.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.027. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
10
Analysis of risk factors for Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy in a Chinese cohort.在中国队列中分析根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的危险因素。
Cancer Med. 2021 Nov;10(21):7772-7780. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4274. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

前列腺穿刺活检至根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分升级的危险因素。

Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Smani Shayan, Sundaresan Vinaik, Lokeshwar Soum D, Choksi Ankur U, Carbonella Jeffrey, Brito Joseph, Renzulli Joseph, Sprenkle Preston, Leapman Michael S

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Department of Urology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):981-996. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

DOI:10.37349/etat.2024.00259
PMID:39280242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390291/
Abstract

Accurate identification of prostate cancer Gleason grade group remains an important component of the initial management of clinically localized disease. However, Gleason score upgrading (GSU) from biopsy to radical prostatectomy can occur in up to a third of patients treated with surgery. Concern for disease undergrading remains a source of diagnostic uncertainty, contributing to both over-treatment of low-risk disease as well as under-treatment of higher-risk prostate cancer. This review examines the published literature concerning risk factors for GSU from time of biopsy to prostatectomy final pathology. Risk factors identified for Gleason upgrading include patient demographic and clinical factors including age, body mass index, race, prostate volume, and biomarker based assays, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density, and testosterone values. In addition, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings have also been associated with GSU. Biopsy-specific characteristics associated with GSU include lower number of biopsy cores and lack of targeted methodology, and possibly increasing percent biopsy core positivity. Recognition of risk factors for disease undergrading may prompt confirmatory testing including repeat sampling or imaging. Continued refinements in imaging guided biopsy techniques may also reduce sampling error contributing to undergrading.

摘要

准确识别前列腺癌Gleason分级组仍然是临床局限性疾病初始管理的重要组成部分。然而,在接受手术治疗的患者中,高达三分之一的患者可能会出现从活检到根治性前列腺切除术时Gleason评分升级(GSU)的情况。对疾病分级过低的担忧仍然是诊断不确定性的一个来源,这既导致了低风险疾病的过度治疗,也导致了高风险前列腺癌的治疗不足。本综述研究了已发表的有关从活检到前列腺切除最终病理GSU风险因素的文献。确定的Gleason升级风险因素包括患者人口统计学和临床因素,如年龄、体重指数、种族、前列腺体积,以及基于生物标志物的检测,包括前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)密度和睾酮值。此外,前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)结果也与GSU有关。与GSU相关的活检特异性特征包括活检芯数量较少、缺乏靶向方法,以及活检芯阳性率可能增加。认识到疾病分级过低的风险因素可能会促使进行确认性检测,包括重复采样或成像。成像引导活检技术的持续改进也可能减少导致分级过低的采样误差。