Suppr超能文献

基于伤口专科中心登记数据预测患者复杂急性伤口愈合情况:一项预后研究

Predicting complex acute wound healing in patients from a wound expertise centre registry: a prognostic study.

作者信息

Ubbink Dirk T, Lindeboom Robert, Eskes Anne M, Brull Huub, Legemate Dink A, Vermeulen Hester

机构信息

Department of Quality Assurance & Process Innovation, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2015 Oct;12(5):531-6. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12149. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Abstract

It is important for caregivers and patients to know which wounds are at risk of prolonged wound healing to enable timely communication and treatment. Available prognostic models predict wound healing in chronic ulcers, but not in acute wounds, that is, originating after trauma or surgery. We developed a model to detect which factors can predict (prolonged) healing of complex acute wounds in patients treated in a large wound expertise centre (WEC). Using Cox and linear regression analyses, we determined which patient- and wound-related characteristics best predict time to complete wound healing and derived a prediction formula to estimate how long this may take. We selected 563 patients with acute wounds, documented in the WEC registry between 2007 and 2012. Wounds had existed for a median of 19 days (range 6-46 days). The majority of these were located on the leg (52%). Five significant independent predictors of prolonged wound healing were identified: wound location on the trunk [hazard ratio (HR) 0·565, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·405-0·788; P = 0·001], wound infection (HR 0·728, 95% CI 0·534-0·991; P = 0·044), wound size (HR 0·993, 95% CI 0·988-0·997; P = 0·001), wound duration (HR 0·998, 95% CI 0·996-0·999; P = 0·005) and patient's age (HR 1·009, 95% CI 1·001-1·018; P = 0·020), but not diabetes. Awareness of the five factors predicting the healing of complex acute wounds, particularly wound infection and location on the trunk, may help caregivers to predict wound healing time and to detect, refer and focus on patients who need additional attention.

摘要

对于护理人员和患者而言,了解哪些伤口存在伤口愈合时间延长的风险非常重要,以便能够及时沟通和治疗。现有的预后模型可预测慢性溃疡的伤口愈合情况,但无法预测急性伤口(即创伤或手术后出现的伤口)的愈合情况。我们开发了一个模型,以检测哪些因素可预测在大型伤口专科中心(WEC)接受治疗的患者复杂急性伤口的(延长)愈合情况。通过Cox回归分析和线性回归分析,我们确定了哪些与患者和伤口相关的特征最能预测伤口完全愈合的时间,并得出了一个预测公式,以估计这可能需要多长时间。我们选择了563例急性伤口患者,这些患者的信息记录在WEC 2007年至2012年的登记册中。伤口存在的中位时间为19天(范围6 - 46天)。其中大多数伤口位于腿部(52%)。确定了五个延长伤口愈合时间的显著独立预测因素:躯干伤口位置[风险比(HR)0·565,95%置信区间(CI)0·405 - 0·788;P = 0·001]、伤口感染(HR 0·728,95% CI 0·534 - 0·991;P = 0·044)、伤口大小(HR 0·993,95% CI 0·988 - 0·997;P = 0·001)、伤口持续时间(HR 0·998,95% CI 0·996 - 0·999;P = 0·005)和患者年龄(HR 1·009,95% CI 1·001 - 1·018;P = 0·020),但不包括糖尿病。了解这五个预测复杂急性伤口愈合的因素,尤其是伤口感染和躯干位置,可能有助于护理人员预测伤口愈合时间,并发现、转诊并关注需要额外关注的患者。

相似文献

1
Predicting complex acute wound healing in patients from a wound expertise centre registry: a prognostic study.
Int Wound J. 2015 Oct;12(5):531-6. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12149. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
3
M.A.I.D.: a prognostic score estimating probability of healing in chronic lower extremity wounds.
Ann Surg. 2009 Apr;249(4):677-81. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819eda06.
4
Use of a gelling fibre dressing in complex surgical or chronic wounds: a case series.
J Wound Care. 2018 Jul 2;27(7):444-454. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.7.444.
8
Cold atmospheric plasma promotes different types of superficial skin erosion wounds healing.
Int Wound J. 2019 Oct;16(5):1103-1111. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13161. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
10
The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings.
J Wound Care. 2017 Feb;26(Sup2):S4-S15. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S4.

引用本文的文献

3
Individualized Risk Prediction for Improved Chronic Wound Management.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2023 Jul;12(7):387-398. doi: 10.1089/wound.2022.0017. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
4
Creation of skin grafts from traumatic avulsed skin.
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Jul 15;14(7):e239545. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239545.
5
Assessing and comparing the quality of wound centres: a literature review and benchmarking pilot.
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1120-1136. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12768. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
6
Rapid identification of slow healing wounds.
Wound Repair Regen. 2016 Jan-Feb;24(1):181-8. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12384. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Critical elements to building an effective wound care center.
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jun;57(6):1703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.112. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Evidence-based decisions for local and systemic wound care.
Br J Surg. 2012 Sep;99(9):1172-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8810. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
3
Do stakeholders in wound care prefer evidence-based wound care products? A survey in the Netherlands.
Int Wound J. 2012 Dec;9(6):624-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00926.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
Management of split skin graft donor sites-results of a national survey.
Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Jan;39(1):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.09.012.
5
Benefit and harm of iodine in wound care: a systematic review.
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Nov;76(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
6
Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 30;8:20. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-20.
7
Topical silver for preventing wound infection.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD006478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006478.pub2.
9
Ten steps towards improving prognosis research.
BMJ. 2009 Dec 30;339:b4184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4184.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验