Zimmer Benjamin
Forschungsstelle für Psychotherapie, Institut für Psychosomatische Kooperationsforschung und Familientherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg.
Psychiatr Prax. 2013 Sep;40(6):347-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1349452. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
A main challenge for evaluating online intervention is to identify which elements are used and to identify participants who are more engaged.
The study analyzes data on intervention use of an Internet-based preparation for inpatient psychosomatic psychotherapeutic treatment (VORSTAT).
Data were available for 176 participants enrolled into VORSTAT from July 2009 to February 2011. The utilization of the program turned out to be very different across the users. Those who used all program features reported at registration more severe impairment, lived further away from the hospital, and had a longer waiting period. Regarding treatment outcome no differences between high and low utilizers were found.
The exploration of process characteristics is critical in the evaluation of Internet-based applications and improved knowledge about individual's usage of online interventions enable us to better tailor therapy according to the individual patients' characteristics and hopefully enhance the efficacy.
评估在线干预的一个主要挑战是确定使用了哪些元素以及确定参与度更高的参与者。
该研究分析了一项基于互联网的住院身心心理治疗准备项目(VORSTAT)的干预使用数据。
2009年7月至2011年2月纳入VORSTAT的176名参与者的数据可用。该项目的使用情况在用户中差异很大。那些使用了所有项目功能的人在注册时报告有更严重的损伤,住得离医院更远,且等待期更长。关于治疗结果,高使用者和低使用者之间未发现差异。
在评估基于互联网的应用时,探索过程特征至关重要,并且对个体在线干预使用情况的更多了解使我们能够根据个体患者的特征更好地调整治疗方法,并有望提高疗效。