California Air Resources Board, Research Division, PO. Box 2815, Sacramento, CA, 95812, USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 Aug;63(8):926-33. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.800170.
Engine and exhaust control technologies applied to compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses have advanced from lean-burn, to lean-burn with oxidation catalyst (OxC), to stoichiometric combustion with three-way catalyst (TWC). With this technology advancement, regulated gaseous and particulate matter emissions have been significantly reduced. Two CNG transit buses equipped with stoichiometric combustion engines and TWCs were tested on a chassis dynamometer, and their emissions were measured. Emissions from the stoichiometric engines with TWCs were then compared to the emissions from lean-burn CNG transit buses tested in previous studies. Stoichiometric combustion with TWC was effective in reducing emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NO(x)), particulate matter (PM), and nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) by 87% to 98% depending on pollutants and test cycles, compared to lean combustion. The high removal efficiencies exceeded the emission reduction required from the certification standards, especially for NO(x) and PM. While the certification standards require 95% and 90% reductions for NO(x) and PM, respectively, from the engine model years 1998-2003 to the engine model year 2007, the measured NO(x) and PM emissions show 96% and 95% reductions, respectively, from the lean-burn engines to the stoichiometric engines with TWC over the transient Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule (UDDS) cycle. One drawback of stoichiometric combustion with TWC is that this technology produces higher carbon monoxide (CO) emissions than lean combustion. In regard to controlling CO emissions, lean combustion with OxC is more effective than stoichiometric combustion. Stoichiometric combustion with TWC produced higher greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions including carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) than lean combustion during the UDDS cycle, but lower GHG emissions during the steady-state cruise cycle.
Stoichiometric combustion with three-way catalyst is currently the best emission control technology available for compressed natural gas (CNG) transit buses to meet the stringent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2010 heavy-duty engine NO(x) emissions standard. For existing lean-burn CNG transit buses in the fleet, oxidation catalyst would be the most effective retrofit technology for the control of NMHC and CO emissions.
应用于压缩天然气(CNG)客车的发动机和排气控制技术已从稀燃发展为稀燃加氧化催化剂(OxC),再发展为三效催化剂(TWC)的化学计量燃烧。随着技术的进步,已显著降低了规定的气体和颗粒物排放。两台装有化学计量燃烧发动机和 TWC 的 CNG 客车在底盘测功机上进行了测试,并测量了它们的排放物。然后,将装有 TWC 的化学计量发动机的排放物与以前研究中测试的稀燃 CNG 客车的排放物进行了比较。与稀燃相比,TWC 的化学计量燃烧可将氮氧化物(NOx)、颗粒物(PM)和非甲烷碳氢化合物(NMHC)的排放量减少 87%至 98%,具体取决于污染物和测试周期。高去除效率超过了认证标准要求的减排量,特别是对于 NOx 和 PM。虽然认证标准要求 1998-2003 年发动机车型年到 2007 年发动机车型年,NOx 和 PM 的排放量分别减少 95%和 90%,但在瞬态城市动态驾驶循环(UDDS)中,从装有 TWC 的稀燃发动机到装有 TWC 的化学计量发动机,NOx 和 PM 的排放量分别减少了 96%和 95%。TWC 的化学计量燃烧的一个缺点是,该技术产生的一氧化碳(CO)排放量高于稀燃。在控制 CO 排放方面,OxC 的稀燃比化学计量燃烧更有效。在 UDDS 循环中,TWC 的化学计量燃烧比稀燃产生了更高的温室气体(GHG)排放,包括二氧化碳(CO2)和甲烷(CH4),但在稳态巡航循环中排放较低。
对于满足美国环境保护署(EPA)2010 年重型发动机 NOx 排放标准的压缩天然气(CNG)客车,目前三效催化剂的化学计量燃烧是最好的排放控制技术。对于车队中现有的稀燃 CNG 客车,氧化催化剂将是控制 NMHC 和 CO 排放的最有效改装技术。