Thiruvengadam Arvind, Besch Marc, Carder Daniel, Oshinuga Adewale, Pasek Randall, Hogo Henry, Gautam Mridul
a Mechanical and Aerospace Department , West Virginia University , Morgantown , WV , USA.
c South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar , CA , USA.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Nov;66(11):1045-1060. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1158751.
The study presents the measurement of carbonyl, BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene), ammonia, elemental/organic carbon (EC/OC), and greenhouse gas emissions from modern heavy-duty diesel and natural gas vehicles. Vehicles from different vocations that included goods movement, refuse trucks, and transit buses were tested on driving cycles representative of their duty cycle. The natural gas vehicle technologies included the stoichiometric engine platform equipped with a three-way catalyst and a diesel-like dual-fuel high-pressure direct-injection technology equipped with a diesel particulate filter (DPF) and a selective catalytic reduction (SCR). The diesel vehicles were equipped with a DPF and SCR. Results of the study show that the BTEX emissions were below detection limits for both diesel and natural gas vehicles, while carbonyl emissions were observed during cold start and low-temperature operations of the natural gas vehicles. Ammonia emissions of about 1 g/mile were observed from the stoichiometric natural gas vehicles equipped with TWC over all the driving cycles. The tailpipe GWP of the stoichiometric natural gas goods movement application was 7% lower than DPF and SCR equipped diesel. In the case of a refuse truck application the stoichiometric natural gas engine exhibited 22% lower GWP than a diesel vehicle. Tailpipe methane emissions contribute to less than 6% of the total GHG emissions.
Modern heavy-duty diesel and natural gas engines are equipped with multiple after-treatment systems and complex control strategies aimed at meeting both the performance standards for the end user and meeting stringent U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emissions regulation. Compared to older technology diesel and natural gas engines, modern engines and after-treatment technology have reduced unregulated emissions to levels close to detection limits. However, brief periods of inefficiencies related to low exhaust thermal energy have been shown to increase both carbonyl and nitrous oxide emissions.
本研究展示了现代重型柴油车和天然气车辆的羰基、BTEX(苯、甲苯、乙苯和二甲苯)、氨、元素碳/有机碳(EC/OC)以及温室气体排放的测量结果。对包括货物运输、垃圾车和公交巴士等不同用途的车辆,在代表其工作循环的行驶工况下进行了测试。天然气车辆技术包括配备三元催化剂的化学计量发动机平台以及配备柴油颗粒过滤器(DPF)和选择性催化还原(SCR)的类似柴油的双燃料高压直喷技术。柴油车配备了DPF和SCR。研究结果表明,柴油车和天然气车的BTEX排放均低于检测限,而在天然气车冷启动和低温运行期间观察到了羰基排放。在所有行驶循环中,配备三元催化器的化学计量天然气车的氨排放约为1克/英里。化学计量天然气货物运输应用的尾管全球变暖潜能值比配备DPF和SCR的柴油车低7%。在垃圾车应用中,化学计量天然气发动机的全球变暖潜能值比柴油车低22%。尾管甲烷排放在总温室气体排放中所占比例不到6%。
现代重型柴油发动机和天然气发动机配备了多种后处理系统和复杂的控制策略,旨在满足最终用户的性能标准以及美国环境保护局(EPA)严格的排放法规。与旧技术的柴油发动机和天然气发动机相比,现代发动机和后处理技术已将未受监管的排放降低到接近检测限的水平。然而,与低排气热能相关的短暂低效期已被证明会增加羰基和一氧化二氮排放。