• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受腰椎手术的患者的临床重要恶化:使用 Oswestry 残疾指数、36 项简短健康调查和疼痛量表的评估方法选择:临床文章。

Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine;

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):564-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12804. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

DOI:10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12804
PMID:24010900
Abstract

OBJECT

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures have become the mainstay for outcome appraisal in spine surgery. Clinically meaningful interpretation of HRQOL improvement has centered on the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). The purpose of this study was to calculate clinically important deterioration (CIDET) thresholds and determine a CIDET value for each HRQOL measure for patients undergoing lumbar fusion.

METHODS

Seven hundred twenty-two patients (248 males, 127 smokers, mean age 60.8 years) were identified with complete preoperative and 1-year postoperative HRQOLs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and numeric rating scales (0-10) for back and leg pain following primary, instrumented, posterior lumbar fusion. Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to calculate CIDET for each HRQOL. Anchor-based methods included change score, change difference, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The Health Transition Item, an independent item of the SF-36, was used as the external anchor. Patients who responded "somewhat worse" and "much worse" were combined and compared with patients responding "about the same." Distribution-based methods were minimum detectable change and effect size.

RESULTS

Diagnoses included spondylolisthesis (n = 332), scoliosis (n = 54), instability (n = 37), disc pathology (n = 146), and stenosis (n = 153). There was a statistically significant change (p < 0.0001) for each HRQOL measure from preoperatively to 1-year postoperatively. Only 107 patients (15%) reported being "somewhat worse" (n = 81) or "much worse" (n = 26). Calculation methods yielded a range of CIDET values for ODI (0.17-9.06), SF-36 physical component summary (-0.32 to 4.43), back pain (0.02-1.50), and leg pain (0.02-1.50).

CONCLUSIONS

A threshold for clinical deterioration was difficult to identify. This may be due to the small number of patients reporting being worse after surgery and the variability across methods to determine CIDET thresholds. Overall, it appears that patients may interpret the absence of change as deterioration.

摘要

目的

健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)测量已成为脊柱外科结果评估的主要方法。对 HRQOL 改善的临床意义的解释主要集中在最小临床重要差异(MCID)上。本研究的目的是计算腰椎融合术后患者的临床重要恶化(CIDET)阈值,并确定每个 HRQOL 测量的 CIDET 值。

方法

确定了 722 例患者(248 例男性,127 例吸烟者,平均年龄 60.8 岁),这些患者均具有完整的术前和术后 1 年 HRQOL,包括 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、36 项简明健康调查(SF-36)以及原发性、器械辅助、后路腰椎融合术后背部和腿部疼痛的数字评分量表(0-10)。使用锚定和分布两种方法来计算每个 HRQOL 的 CIDET。锚定方法包括变化得分、变化差异和受试者工作特征曲线分析。SF-36 的独立项目“健康过渡项目”被用作外部锚。将回答“稍微差一些”和“差很多”的患者合并,并与回答“大致相同”的患者进行比较。分布方法包括最小可检测变化和效应量。

结果

诊断包括滑椎(n = 332)、脊柱侧凸(n = 54)、不稳定(n = 37)、椎间盘病变(n = 146)和狭窄(n = 153)。每个 HRQOL 测量值从术前到术后 1 年均有统计学意义的变化(p < 0.0001)。只有 107 例患者(15%)报告“稍差”(n = 81)或“差很多”(n = 26)。计算方法得出了 ODI(0.17-9.06)、SF-36 生理成分综合评分(-0.32 至 4.43)、背部疼痛(0.02-1.50)和腿部疼痛(0.02-1.50)的 CIDET 值范围。

结论

确定临床恶化的阈值很困难。这可能是由于术后报告恶化的患者数量较少,以及确定 CIDET 阈值的方法存在差异所致。总体而言,似乎患者会将无变化解释为恶化。

相似文献

1
Clinically important deterioration in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a choice of evaluation methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and pain scales: clinical article.接受腰椎手术的患者的临床重要恶化:使用 Oswestry 残疾指数、36 项简短健康调查和疼痛量表的评估方法选择:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):564-8. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12804. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
2
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症后评估疼痛、残疾和健康状况的最小临床重要差异的效用。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 May;14(5):598-604. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.SPINE10472. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
3
Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.神经减压融合治疗同节段复发性腰椎狭窄症后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异:理解临床与统计学意义。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):471-8. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11842. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
4
Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.测定融合延伸治疗相邻节段病变后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):61-7. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE1194. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
5
Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.评估翻修融合术后因症状性假关节而导致的疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Spine J. 2012 Dec;12(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
6
Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.区分原发性和翻修腰椎融合手术的最小临床重要差异。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Jan;18(1):102-6. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12727. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
7
Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.根据特定诊断指征分层的腰椎融合术结果。
Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.011. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
8
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.腰椎手术患者的最小临床重要差异:使用奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数、医学结局研究简明健康调查问卷36项版本和疼痛量表的方法选择
Spine J. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):968-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
9
Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后疼痛、残疾和生活质量的最小临床重要差异评估:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Feb;18(2):154-60. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.SPINE12312. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
10
Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.颈椎融合术后,颈椎残障指数、36 项简短健康调查量表躯体成分概括、颈痛和臂痛量表的最小临床重要差异和显著临床获益。
Spine J. 2010 Jun;10(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Variations in quantifying patient reported outcome measures to estimate treatment effect.在量化患者报告的结局指标以估计治疗效果方面的差异。
World J Methodol. 2025 Jun 20;15(2):97078. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i2.97078.
2
The minimal clinically important difference of the scleroderma clinical trials consortium damage index.硬皮病临床试验协会损伤指数的最小临床重要差异
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2025 Mar 25:23971983251327808. doi: 10.1177/23971983251327808.
3
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.
微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
4
Improvements in Mental Well-Being and its Predictive Factors in Patients who Underwent Cervical versus Lumbar Decompression Surgery.接受颈椎减压手术与腰椎减压手术患者的心理健康改善及其预测因素
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2021 Jun 11;6(1):10-16. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0060. eCollection 2022.
5
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.全腰椎内镜与棘突间撑开器治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效差异比较:临床结局的效应量Meta分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
6
Comparison of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis: effect of pedicle screw placement on proximal facet invasion in surgical treatment.退变性腰椎滑脱与峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的比较:手术治疗中椎弓根螺钉置钉对邻近小关节突侵犯的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04962-7.
7
Improvements in Back and Leg Pain Following a Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后腰腿痛的改善情况
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):745-755. doi: 10.14444/7107.
8
Lumbar Endoscopic Bony and Soft Tissue Decompression With the Hybridized Inside-Out Approach: A Review And Technical Note.采用内外结合杂交技术的腰椎内镜下骨与软组织减压术:综述与技术要点
Neurospine. 2020 Jul;17(Suppl 1):S34-S43. doi: 10.14245/ns.2040160.080. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Arthroscopic Transosseous Repair of Rotator Cuff Tear and Greater Tuberosity Cysts.关节镜下经骨修复肩袖撕裂和大结节囊肿
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 May 29;2(3):e241-e250. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.03.005. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures with the Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lateral Recess and Foraminal Stenosis.经椎间孔内镜减压治疗侧隐窝和椎间孔狭窄患者报告结局指标的最小临床重要差异
Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Apr 30;14(2):254-266. doi: 10.14444/7034. eCollection 2020 Apr.