• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。

Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY , USA.

出版信息

Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087
PMID:35843537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11620261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Surgical counseling enables shared decision-making (SDM) by improving patients' understanding.

PURPOSE

To provide answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent primary tubular minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery in form of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF), decompression alone, or microdiscectomy and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Surgical (radiation exposure and intraoperative complications) (2)Immediate postoperative (length of stay [LOS] and complications) (3) Clinical outcomes (Visual Analog Scale- back and leg, VAS; Oswestry Disability Index, ODI; 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score, SF-12 PCS; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, PROMIS PF; Global Rating Change, GRC; return to activities; complications/reoperations) METHODS: The outcome measures were analyzed to provide answers to ten FAQs that were compiled based on the authors' experience and a review of literature. Changes in VAS back, VAS leg, ODI, and SF-12 PCS from preoperative values to the early (<6 months) and late (>6 months) postoperative time points were analyzed with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Tests. % of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for these patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at the two time points was evaluated. Changes in PROs from preoperative values too early (<6 months) and late (≥6 months) postoperative time points were analyzed within each of the three groups. Percentage of patients achieving MCID was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-six patients (104 TLIF, 147 decompression, 115 microdiscectomy) were included. The following FAQs were answered: (1) Will my back pain improve? Most patients report improvement by >50%. About 60% of TLIF, decompression, and microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID at ≥6 months. (2) Will my leg pain improve? Most patients report improvement by >50%. 56% of TLIF, 67% of decompression, and 70% of microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID at ≥6 months. (3) Will my activity level improve? Most patients report significant improvement. Sixty-six percent of TLIF, 55% of decompression, and 75% of microdiscectomy patients achieved MCID for SF-12 PCS. (4) Is there a chance I will get worse? Six percent after TLIF, 14% after decompression, and 5% after microdiscectomy. (5) Will I receive a significant amount of radiation? The radiation exposure is likely to be acceptable and nearly insignificant in terms of radiation-related risks. (6) What is the likelihood that I will have a complication? 17.3% (15.4% minor, 1.9% major) for TLIF, 10% (9.3% minor and 0.7% major) for decompression, and 1.7% (all minor) for microdiscectomy (7) Will I need another surgery? Six percent after TLIF, 16.3% after decompression, 13% after microdiscectomy. (8) How long will I stay in the hospital? Most patients get discharged on postoperative day one after TLIF and on the same day after decompression and microdiscectomy. (9) When will I be able to return to work? >80% of patients return to work (average: 25 days after TLIF, 14 days after decompression, 11 days after microdiscectomy). (10) Will I be able to drive again? >90% of patients return to driving (average: 22 days after TLIF, 11 days after decompression, 14 days after microdiscectomy).

CONCLUSIONS

These concise answers to the FAQs in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery can be used by physicians as a reference to enable patient education.

摘要

背景语境

手术咨询通过提高患者的理解能力来促进共同决策(SDM)。

目的

为微创腰椎手术提供常见问题解答(FAQ)。

研究设计

前瞻性收集数据的回顾性研究。

患者样本

接受经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MI-TLIF)、单纯减压或显微椎间盘切除术的原发性管状微创腰椎手术,且至少随访 1 年的患者。

结果测量

(1)手术(辐射暴露和术中并发症)(2)术后即刻(住院时间 [LOS] 和并发症)(3)临床结果(VAS-背、VAS-腿、ODI、12 项简明健康调查量表物理成分评分 [SF-12 PCS]、患者报告的结果测量信息系统物理功能 [PROMIS PF]、总体评分变化、恢复活动、并发症/再次手术)

方法

分析结果测量值,以回答根据作者经验和文献综述编写的十个 FAQ。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析从术前值到早期(<6 个月)和晚期(>6 个月)术后时间点的 VAS 背、VAS 腿、ODI 和 SF-12 PCS 的变化。评估这些患者报告的结果测量值(PROMs)在两个时间点上达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者比例。在每组内分析从术前值到早期(<6 个月)和晚期(≥6 个月)术后时间点的 PROs 的变化。还评估了达到 MCID 的患者比例。

结论

共纳入 366 例患者(TLIF 组 104 例、减压组 147 例、显微椎间盘切除术组 115 例)。回答了以下 FAQ:(1)我的背痛会改善吗?大多数患者报告改善>50%。TLIF、减压和显微椎间盘切除术患者约 60%在≥6 个月时达到 MCID。(2)我的腿痛会改善吗?大多数患者报告改善>50%。TLIF 组 56%、减压组 67%和显微椎间盘切除术组 70%的患者在≥6 个月时达到 MCID。(3)我的活动水平会提高吗?大多数患者报告有显著改善。TLIF 组 66%、减压组 55%和显微椎间盘切除术组 75%的患者达到 SF-12 PCS 的 MCID。(4)我有恶化的可能吗?TLIF 后 6%、减压后 14%、显微椎间盘切除术后 5%。(5)我会接受大量辐射吗?辐射暴露可能是可以接受的,并且从辐射相关风险的角度来看几乎可以忽略不计。(6)我有发生并发症的可能性有多大?TLIF 组为 17.3%(15.4%为轻微并发症,1.9%为严重并发症),减压组为 10%(9.3%为轻微并发症,0.7%为严重并发症),显微椎间盘切除术组为 1.7%(均为轻微并发症)(7)我需要再做手术吗?TLIF 后 6%、减压后 16.3%、显微椎间盘切除术后 13%。(8)我要住院多久?大多数患者在 TLIF 后第一天出院,减压和显微椎间盘切除术后同一天出院。(9)我什么时候能回去工作?>80%的患者(平均:TLIF 后 25 天、减压后 14 天、显微椎间盘切除术后 11 天)返回工作岗位。(10)我什么时候能开车?>90%的患者(平均:TLIF 后 22 天、减压后 11 天、显微椎间盘切除术后 14 天)可以开车。

这些微创腰椎手术常见问题解答的简洁答案可作为医生进行患者教育的参考。

相似文献

1
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.微创腰椎手术常见问题的实用解答。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Pathology: Clinical Outcome Comparison in Patients With Predominant Back Pain.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与侧方腰椎体间融合术治疗退行性脊柱病变:以腰痛为主诉患者的临床疗效比较。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E441-E447. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001631. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Class 2/3 obesity leads to worse outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.2/3级肥胖导致微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后预后更差。
Spine J. 2025 Sep;25(9):1985-1996. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.020. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.经微创减压治疗后,腰椎狭窄症患者的主要腰痛得到改善。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Jul 14;39(4):576-582. doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23278. Print 2023 Oct 1.
5
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前腿部疼痛严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后患者报告结局、最小临床重要差异实现和患者满意度的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e1196-e1207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the biportal endoscopic techniques versus microscopic tubular technique.经皮双侧双通道内镜技术与传统显微镜下经椎间孔入路腰椎间融合术的对比研究
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2066-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
Influence of Preoperative 12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Score on Clinical Outcomes in an Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Population Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前 12 项简短心理综合评分对微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱患者临床结局的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e1022-e1030. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.026. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
8
Temporal Trends of Improvement After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后改善情况的时间趋势
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jan 15;50(2):81-87. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005024. Epub 2024 May 6.
9
The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.术前残疾严重程度对微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术后患者报告结局及患者满意度的影响
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e334-e346. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.051. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
10
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Biportal Endoscopic Versus Tubular Approach for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双孔内镜与管状入路治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2025 Jun 26:21925682251356220. doi: 10.1177/21925682251356220.
2
Impact of first ambulation time on unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.首次下床活动时间对腰椎间盘突出症单侧双孔通道内镜手术的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6362-6373. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002686. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
3
Patient Factors Associated with Recurrent Herniation and Revision Surgery following Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Workflow and Efficiency of Robotic-Assisted Navigation in Spine Surgery.脊柱手术中机器人辅助导航的工作流程与效率
HSS J. 2021 Oct;17(3):302-307. doi: 10.1177/15563316211026658. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
2
Facet Violation With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Impact of 3D Navigation and Facet Orientation.经皮椎弓根螺钉置入时的小关节侵犯:三维导航和小关节方向的影响
HSS J. 2021 Oct;17(3):281-288. doi: 10.1177/15563316211026324. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
3
Development and Initial Internal Validation of a Novel Classification System for Perioperative Expectations Following Minimally Invasive Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery.
腰椎间盘显微切除术后复发性疝和翻修手术相关的患者因素
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Oct 5;9(2):244-250. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0148. eCollection 2025 Mar 27.
4
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain.单纯微创减压与融合治疗以背痛为主的疗效比较
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):42-48. doi: 10.1177/15563316231223503. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
5
Assessing the Clinical Appropriateness and Practical Utility of ChatGPT as an Educational Resource for Patients Considering Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.评估ChatGPT作为考虑微创脊柱手术患者的教育资源的临床适用性和实际效用。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 8;16(10):e71105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71105. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Comparison of postoperative complications and outcomes following primary versus revision discectomy: A national database analysis.初次与翻修椎间盘切除术术后并发症及结局的比较:一项全国性数据库分析。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):303-307. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_97_24. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
7
The Impact of Preoperative Sagittal Imbalance on Long-term Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Laminectomy.术前矢状面失衡对微创椎板切除术后长期疗效的影响。
HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):222-229. doi: 10.1177/15563316231162851. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
8
Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.年龄对 L4 退变性脊椎滑脱单纯减压与融合手术比较结果的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3749-3759. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
9
Ninety Percent of Patients Are Satisfied With Their Decision to Undergo Spine Surgery for Degenerative Conditions.90%的患者对他们因退行性疾病接受脊柱手术的决定感到满意。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Apr 15;49(8):561-568. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004714. Epub 2023 May 9.
10
Preoperative Disability Influences Effectiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Predicting Patient Improvement Following Cervical Spine Surgery.术前残疾状况影响最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态在预测颈椎手术后患者改善情况方面的有效性。
Global Spine J. 2025 Mar;15(2):884-890. doi: 10.1177/21925682231215765. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
微创腰椎退行性疾病手术后围手术期预期的新型分类系统的制定与初步内部验证。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E537-E544. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001246.
4
Combining Expandable Interbody Cage Technology With a Minimally Invasive Technique to Harvest Iliac Crest Autograft Bone to Optimize Fusion Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.将可扩张椎间融合器技术与微创技术相结合,以获取髂嵴自体骨,从而优化微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术的融合效果。
Clin Spine Surg. 2021 Nov 1;34(9):E522-E530. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001228.
5
Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated With Decreased Rates of Hardware-Related Revision After Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Fusion.计算机辅助导航与后路腰椎融合内固定术后与硬件相关的翻修率降低有关。
Global Spine J. 2023 May;13(4):1104-1111. doi: 10.1177/21925682211019696. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
The Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in Spine: A Systematic Review.患者报告结局测量信息系统在脊柱疾病中的应用:一项系统评价
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):186-194. doi: 10.14444/8024. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
7
Time-demand, Radiation Exposure and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery With the Use of Skin-Anchored Intraoperative Navigation: The Effect of the Learning Curve.经皮固定术中导航辅助微创脊柱手术的时间需求、辐射暴露与结局:学习曲线的影响。
Clin Spine Surg. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):E111-E120. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001167.
8
Editorial for current state of intraoperative imaging in spinal surgery.脊柱手术中术中成像现状的社论
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):83. doi: 10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-12.
9
Development of prediction models for clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS scores after lumbar decompression.腰椎减压术后 PROMIS 评分有临床意义改善的预测模型的开发。
Spine J. 2021 Mar;21(3):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
10
Practical answers to frequently asked questions for shared decision-making in adult spinal deformity surgery.成人脊柱畸形手术共同决策常见问题的实用解答。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Oct 16;34(2):218-227. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20363. Print 2021 Feb 1.