Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 9;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-121.
Licensed physicians in Alberta are required to participate in the Physician Achievement Review (PAR) program every 5 years, comprising multi-source feedback questionnaires with confidential feedback, and practice visits for a minority of physicians. We wished to identify and classify issues requiring change or improvement from the family practice visits, and the responses to advice.
Retrospective analysis of narrative practice visit reports data using a mixed methods design to study records of visits to 51 family physicians and general practitioners who participated in PAR during the period 2010 to 2011, and whose ratings in one or more major assessment domains were significantly lower than their peer group.
Reports from visits to the practices of family physicians and general practitioners confirmed opportunities for change and improvement, with two main groupings - practice environment and physician performance. For 40/51 physicians (78%) suggested actions were discussed with physicians and changes were confirmed. Areas of particular concern included problems arising from practice isolation and diagnostic conclusions being reached with incomplete clinical evidence.
This study provides additional evidence for the construct validity of a regulatory authority educational program in which multi-source performance feedback identifies areas for practice quality improvement, and change is encouraged by supplementary contact for selected physicians.
艾伯塔省的执业医师每 5 年必须参加医师绩效评估(PAR)计划,该计划包括多源反馈问卷和机密反馈,以及对少数医生进行实践访问。我们希望从家庭实践访问中识别和分类需要改变或改进的问题,以及对建议的回应。
使用混合方法设计对叙事性实践访问报告数据进行回顾性分析,以研究 2010 年至 2011 年期间参加 PAR 的 51 名家庭医生和全科医生的访问记录,他们在一个或多个主要评估领域的评分明显低于同侪群体。
对家庭医生和全科医生诊所的访问报告证实了有机会进行改变和改进,主要有两个分组-实践环境和医生表现。对于 40/51 名医生(78%),与医生讨论了建议的行动,并确认了变更。特别关注的领域包括由于实践孤立和临床证据不完整而导致的问题。
这项研究为监管机构教育计划的结构有效性提供了额外的证据,该计划通过多源绩效反馈确定了实践质量改进的领域,并通过为选定医生提供补充联系来鼓励变革。