Jerrell J M, Ridgely M S
University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Department of Neuropsychiatry and Behavioral Science, CEB 104A, 3555 Harden Street Ext., Columbia, SC 29203, USA.
Eval Program Plann. 1999 Aug;22(3):323-30. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7189(99)00023-3.
The relationship between two aspects of program quality (robustness of model implementation and service dosage), client outcomes of self-reported and observer-rated psychosocial functioning, and intensive mental health service utilization costs was examined for 132 persons with dual mental and substance disorders. Membership in the 'robustly implemented' behavioral skills intervention was significantly associated with higher levels of self-reported and observer-rated psychosocial functioning, while membership in the 'robustly implemented' 12-step group was significantly related to higher intensive mental health service costs. Dosage of supportive service exhibited a significant, positive relationship to lower intensive mental health service costs but not to functioning. Although the addition of qualitative data was useful in interpreting the findings from the main study analyses, it had no discernable statistical impact on the regression equations for three major outcome variables.
针对132名患有精神和物质双重障碍的患者,研究了项目质量的两个方面(模型实施的稳健性和服务剂量)、自我报告和观察者评定的心理社会功能的客户结果以及强化心理健康服务利用成本之间的关系。参与“稳健实施”的行为技能干预与自我报告和观察者评定的较高心理社会功能水平显著相关,而参与“稳健实施”的12步团体与较高的强化心理健康服务成本显著相关。支持性服务的剂量与较低的强化心理健康服务成本呈显著正相关,但与功能无关。虽然定性数据的加入有助于解释主要研究分析的结果,但对三个主要结果变量的回归方程没有明显的统计影响。