Faulds Jason, Bell Nathaniel J, Harrington David M, Novick Teresa V, Harris Jeremy R, DeRose Guy, Forbes Thomas L
Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;27(8):1061-7. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.020. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
Within Southwestern Ontario, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery has been centralized to a single university-affiliated medical center. The referral area serves 1.9 million people and includes community hospitals with limited vascular surgery capabilities. We reviewed the role of patients' travel distance, geographic location, and socioeconomic status (SES) to determine if centralization of endovascular programs results in disparity in access to endovascular surgery. We hypothesized that patients would travel a longer distance to specifically seek elective endovascular surgery while having open and emergent surgery closer to home.
All patients who underwent AAA repair (July 2005-June 2010) at London Health Science Centre were identified from the vascular surgery database. Method of repair, clinical presentation, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Travel distance from each patient's home to our hospital and rural versus urban status was determined for each patient. SES was determined by using a previously validated, locally developed deprivation index.
During this 5-year period, 1,243 patients were included in our analysis; 46.8% (n=581) underwent endovascular repair (EVAR) and 53.2% (n=662) underwent open repair. For elective cases, the in-hospital mortality rate was 2.0% (n=11) for EVAR and 3.6% (n=20) for open repair (P=0.1). There was no difference in clinical presentation between SES groups, but open repair was more frequently used in patients of lower SES compared to higher SES (odds ratio=1.32; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.72). Travel distance and rural/urban status were not associated with increased odds of EVAR. When ruptured aneurysms were excluded, elective patients of lower SES continued to have a higher rate of open surgery.
Despite the centralization of endovascular programs in Canada, patients do not appear to be traveling a longer distance for EVAR while having open repairs closer to home as we expected. We did note that higher SES was associated with increased odds of EVAR, which may suggest a health care access bias for EVAR for patients of higher SES. Larger, population-based studies at the provincial or national level could confirm these initial findings.
在安大略省西南部,腹主动脉瘤(AAA)手术已集中至一家大学附属医疗中心。该转诊区域服务190万人,包括血管外科能力有限的社区医院。我们评估了患者的出行距离、地理位置和社会经济地位(SES)的作用,以确定血管内治疗项目的集中化是否会导致血管内手术可及性的差异。我们假设患者会为了择期血管内手术而长途跋涉,而开放性和急诊手术则在离家较近的地方进行。
从血管外科数据库中识别出所有在伦敦健康科学中心接受AAA修复手术(2005年7月至2010年6月)的患者。记录修复方法、临床表现和住院死亡率。确定每位患者从家中到我院的出行距离以及农村或城市身份。SES通过使用先前验证的、本地开发的贫困指数来确定。
在这5年期间,1243例患者纳入我们的分析;46.8%(n = 581)接受血管内修复(EVAR),53.2%(n = 662)接受开放性修复。对于择期病例,EVAR的住院死亡率为2.0%(n = 11),开放性修复为3.6%(n = 20)(P = 0.1)。SES组之间的临床表现无差异,但与高SES患者相比,低SES患者更常采用开放性修复(比值比 = 1.32;95%置信区间:1.02 - 1.72)。出行距离和农村/城市身份与EVAR几率增加无关。排除破裂动脉瘤后,低SES的择期患者开放性手术率仍然较高。
尽管加拿大血管内治疗项目已集中化,但患者似乎并未像我们预期的那样为了EVAR而长途跋涉,同时在离家较近的地方接受开放性修复。我们确实注意到高SES与EVAR几率增加相关,这可能表明高SES患者在EVAR的医疗可及性方面存在偏差。在省级或国家级进行更大规模的基于人群的研究可以证实这些初步发现。