Borreani G, Coppa M, Revello-Chion A, Comino L, Giaccone D, Ferlay A, Tabacco E
University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy.
University of Turin, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Via L. da Vinci 44, 10095, Grugliasco (Turin), Italy.
J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(11):6840-6855. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6710. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
The aim of this work was to characterize the fatty acid (FA) profile of milk from intensive dairy farming systems in the Po Plain (Italy) to estimate the costs of the adopted feeding strategies and to simulate the effect of supplementary premiums on the basis of milk FA composition on milk income. Twenty dairy farms with 5 different feeding strategies were studied: 3 corn silage-based systems in which cows were supplemented with a great proportion (CCH), a medium proportion (CCM), or without commercial concentrate mix (CC0), and 2 systems in which part of corn silage was replaced with grass or legume silage (HF) or with fresh herbage (G), cut and fed indoors. Bulk milk was sampled and lactating cow performance, feeding strategies and forage characteristics were recorded through a survey, 3 times during a year. The milk FA supplementary premium was calculated considering C18:3n-3 and saturated FA (SFA) concentrations, and ratio of total cis C18:1 isomers to C16:0. The CCH, CCM, and CC0 systems bought most of their dairy cow feeds off farm, which allowed them to increase milk production to 35,000 L/yr per hectare. Their low dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency led to higher feeding costs per liter of milk (from €0.158 to €0.184), and highest income over feed cost was achieved only for milk yield performance greater than 10,000 kg/cow per year. The use of homegrown forages in HF and G increased dry matter and crude protein self-sufficiency and reduced the feeding costs per liter of milk from 9 to 22%, compared with the other studied systems, making HF and G feeding economically competitive, even for a lower milk yield per cow. The studied systems highlighted a remarkable variation in FA profiles. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the highest in CCH (31.53 and 67.84 g/100g of FA) and G (31.23 and 68.45 g/100g of FA), because of the larger proportion of commercial concentrate mix in the cow diet. The concentrations of C16:0 and SFA were the lowest in CCM (27.86 and 63.10 g/100g of FA), because of low roughage-to-concentrate ratio in the cow diet, which is known to favor milk fat depression, affecting particularly these FA. The calculated supplementary premium was the highest in the CCM system, based on milk FA profiles from those herds. The HF diet was rich in forages and resulted in greater concentration of C18:3n-3 in milk (0.57 g/100g of FA) than the other systems and thus led to an increase in milk FA supplementary premium. Milk from G and HF milk had the lowest ratio of Σn-6:Σn-3 FA compared with milk from the systems based on higher corn silage proportion in the cow diet (3.71, and 3.25, respectively, vs. 4.58 to 4.78), with the lower ratios being closer to recommendation for human nutrition.
本研究旨在对意大利波河平原集约化奶牛养殖系统的牛奶脂肪酸(FA)谱进行表征,估算所采用饲养策略的成本,并基于牛奶FA组成模拟补贴对牛奶收入的影响。研究了20个采用5种不同饲养策略的奶牛场:3个以玉米青贮为基础的系统,其中奶牛分别补充大量(CCH)、中等量(CCM)商业浓缩料或不补充商业浓缩料(CC0),以及2个用青贮牧草或豆科植物青贮料(HF)或新鲜牧草(G)替代部分玉米青贮料并在室内切割饲喂的系统。采集了混合牛奶样本,并通过一年3次的调查记录泌乳奶牛的生产性能、饲养策略和饲料特性。根据C18:3n-3和饱和脂肪酸(SFA)浓度以及总顺式C18:1异构体与C16:0的比例计算牛奶FA补贴。CCH、CCM和CC0系统的大部分奶牛饲料购自农场外,这使它们能够将牛奶产量提高到每公顷每年35000升。它们较低的干物质和粗蛋白自给率导致每升牛奶的饲养成本较高(从0.158欧元到0.184欧元),只有当奶牛年奶产量超过10000千克时,饲料成本之上的收入才最高。与其他研究系统相比,HF和G系统使用自产饲料提高了干物质和粗蛋白自给率,并使每升牛奶的饲养成本降低了9%至22%,这使得HF和G系统在经济上具有竞争力,即使奶牛的产奶量较低。所研究的系统显示出FA谱有显著差异。由于奶牛日粮中商业浓缩料比例较大,CCH(31.53和67.84克/100克FA)和G(31.23和68.45克/100克FA)系统中C16:0和SFA的浓度最高。由于奶牛日粮中粗饲料与浓缩料比例较低,已知这有利于乳脂降低,尤其影响这些脂肪酸,CCM系统中C16:0和SFA的浓度最低(27.86和63.10克/100克FA)。根据这些牛群的牛奶FA谱计算,CCM系统的补贴最高。HF日粮富含饲料,导致牛奶中C18:3n-3的浓度(0.57克/100克FA)高于其他系统,从而导致牛奶FA补贴增加。与奶牛日粮中玉米青贮比例较高的系统的牛奶相比,G和HF牛奶中Σn-6:Σn-3 FA的比例最低(分别为3.71和3.25,而其他系统为4.58至4.78),较低的比例更接近人类营养推荐值。