Suppr超能文献

纹状体投射神经元中腺苷A1和A2A受体的顺序和同时激活对Ca2+电流的调节作用。

Modulation of Ca2+-currents by sequential and simultaneous activation of adenosine A1 and A 2A receptors in striatal projection neurons.

作者信息

Hernández-González O, Hernández-Flores T, Prieto G A, Pérez-Burgos A, Arias-García M A, Galarraga E, Bargas J

机构信息

División de Neurociencias, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [UNAM], P.O. Box: 70-253, Mexico City, México, 04510.

出版信息

Purinergic Signal. 2014;10(2):269-81. doi: 10.1007/s11302-013-9386-z. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Abstract

D(1)- and D(2)-types of dopamine receptors are located separately in direct and indirect pathway striatal projection neurons (dSPNs and iSPNs). In comparison, adenosine A(1)-type receptors are located in both neuron classes, and adenosine A(2A)-type receptors show a preferential expression in iSPNs. Due to their importance for neuronal excitability, Ca(2+)-currents have been used as final effectors to see the function of signaling cascades associated with different G protein-coupled receptors. For example, among many other actions, D(1)-type receptors increase, while D(2)-type receptors decrease neuronal excitability by either enhancing or reducing, respectively, CaV1 Ca(2+)-currents. These actions occur separately in dSPNs and iSPNs. In the case of purinergic signaling, the actions of A(1)- and A(2A)-receptors have not been compared observing their actions on Ca(2+)-channels of SPNs as final effectors. Our hypotheses are that modulation of Ca(2+)-currents by A(1)-receptors occurs in both dSPNs and iSPNs. In contrast, iSPNs would exhibit modulation by both A(1)- and A2A-receptors. We demonstrate that A(1)-type receptors reduced Ca(2+)-currents in all SPNs tested. However, A(2A)-type receptors enhanced Ca(2+)-currents only in half tested neurons. Intriguingly, to observe the actions of A(2A)-type receptors, occupation of A(1)-type receptors had to occur first. However, A(1)-receptors decreased Ca(V)2 Ca(2+)-currents, while A(2A)-type receptors enhanced current through Ca(V)1 channels. Because these channels have opposing actions on cell discharge, these differences explain in part why iSPNs may be more excitable than dSPNs. It is demonstrated that intrinsic voltage-gated currents expressed in SPNs are effectors of purinergic signaling that therefore play a role in excitability.

摘要

D(1)型和D(2)型多巴胺受体分别位于直接和间接通路的纹状体投射神经元(直接通路纹状体投射神经元和间接通路纹状体投射神经元)中。相比之下,腺苷A(1)型受体存在于这两类神经元中,而腺苷A(2A)型受体在间接通路纹状体投射神经元中表现出优先表达。由于它们对神经元兴奋性的重要性,钙电流已被用作最终效应器来观察与不同G蛋白偶联受体相关的信号级联的功能。例如,在许多其他作用中,D(1)型受体通过分别增强或减少CaV1钙电流来增加神经元兴奋性,而D(2)型受体则降低神经元兴奋性。这些作用分别在直接通路纹状体投射神经元和间接通路纹状体投射神经元中发生。在嘌呤能信号传导的情况下,尚未比较A(1)型和A(2A)型受体对纹状体投射神经元钙通道的作用并将其作为最终效应器进行观察。我们的假设是,A(1)型受体对钙电流的调节发生在直接通路纹状体投射神经元和间接通路纹状体投射神经元中。相比之下,间接通路纹状体投射神经元将表现出A(1)型和A2A型受体的双重调节。我们证明,A(1)型受体在所有测试的纹状体投射神经元中降低了钙电流。然而,A(2A)型受体仅在一半测试神经元中增强了钙电流。有趣地是,为了观察A(2A)型受体的作用,必须首先占据A(1)型受体。然而,A(1)型受体降低了Ca(V)2钙电流,而A(2A)型受体增强了通过Ca(V)1通道的电流。由于这些通道对细胞放电具有相反的作用,这些差异部分解释了为什么间接通路纹状体投射神经元可能比直接通路纹状体投射神经元更易兴奋。结果表明,纹状体投射神经元中表达的内在电压门控电流是嘌呤能信号传导的效应器,因此在兴奋性中起作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Cholinergic modulation of striatal microcircuits.胆碱能调制纹状体微电路。
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Mar;49(5):604-622. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13949. Epub 2018 Nov 29.

本文引用的文献

4
Modulation of striatal projection systems by dopamine.多巴胺对纹状体投射系统的调制。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:441-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113641.
7
Update on models of basal ganglia function and dysfunction.基底神经节功能和障碍模型的最新进展。
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Dec;15 Suppl 3(0 3):S237-40. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(09)70822-3.
9
Adenosine, adenosine A 2A antagonists, and Parkinson's disease.腺苷、腺苷A2A拮抗剂与帕金森病
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Jul;15(6):406-13. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 May 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验