School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, McGregor Road, Smithfield, Cairns 4878, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 9;13:818. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-818.
Male circumcision (MC) reduces HIV acquisition and is a key public health intervention in settings with high HIV prevalence, heterosexual transmission and low MC rates. In Papua New Guinea (PNG), where HIV prevalence is 0.8%, there is no medical MC program for HIV prevention. There are however many different foreskin cutting practices across the country's 800 language groups. The major form exposes the glans but does not remove the foreskin. This study aimed to describe and quantify foreskin cutting styles, practices and beliefs. It also aimed to assess the acceptability of MC for HIV prevention in PNG.
Cross-sectional multicentre study, at two university campuses (Madang Province and National Capital District) and at two 'rural development' sites (mining site Enga Province; palm-oil plantation in Oro Province). Structured questionnaires were completed by participants originating from all regions of PNG who were resident at each site for study or work.
Questionnaires were completed by 861 men and 519 women. Of men, 47% reported a longitudinal foreskin cut (cut through the dorsal surface to expose the glans but foreskin not removed); 43% reported no foreskin cut; and 10% a circumferential foreskin cut (complete removal). Frequency and type of cut varied significantly by region of origin (p < .001). Most men (72-82%) were cut between the ages of 10-20 years. Longitudinal cuts were most often done in a village by a friend, with circumferential cuts most often done in a clinic by a health professional. Most uncut men (71%) and longitudinal cut men (84%) stated they would remove their foreskin if it reduced the risk of HIV infection. More than 95% of uncut men and 97% of longitudinal cut men would prefer the procedure in a clinic or hospital. Most men (90%) and women (74%) stated they would remove the foreskin of their son if it reduced the risk of HIV infection.
Although 57% of men reported some form of foreskin cut only 10% reported the complete removal of the foreskin, the procedure on which international HIV prevention strategies are based. The acceptability of MC (complete foreskin removal) is high among men (for themselves and their sons) and women (for their sons). Potential MC services need to be responsive to the diversity of beliefs and practices and consider health system constraints. A concerted research effort to investigate the potential protective effects of longitudinal cuts for HIV acquisition is essential given the scale of longitudinal cuts in PNG.
男性割礼(MC)可降低 HIV 感染率,是 HIV 高发、异性传播和 MC 率低的环境中的一项重要公共卫生干预措施。在巴布亚新几内亚(PNG),HIV 感染率为 0.8%,没有用于 HIV 预防的医学 MC 项目。但是,在全国 800 个语言群体中,存在着许多不同的包皮切割习俗。主要形式是暴露龟头但不切除包皮。本研究旨在描述和量化包皮切割方式、习俗和观念,并评估 MC 在 PNG 预防 HIV 中的可接受性。
这是一项在两个大学校园(马当省和国家首都区)和两个“农村发展”地点(恩加省采矿点;奥罗省油棕种植园)进行的横断面多中心研究。来自 PNG 各个地区的参与者在每个地点居住或工作时填写了结构式问卷。
共完成了 861 名男性和 519 名女性的问卷。47%的男性报告存在纵向包皮切割(从背侧切开,暴露龟头但不切除包皮);43%的男性报告没有包皮切割;10%的男性报告存在环状包皮切割(完全切除)。不同地区的切割频率和类型差异显著(p<0.001)。大多数男性(72-82%)在 10-20 岁时接受了切割。纵向切割最常由朋友在村庄进行,环状切割最常由卫生专业人员在诊所进行。大多数未切割的男性(71%)和纵向切割的男性(84%)表示,如果能够降低 HIV 感染风险,他们会切除包皮。超过 95%的未切割男性和 97%的纵向切割男性更喜欢在诊所或医院进行该手术。大多数男性(90%)和女性(74%)表示,如果能够降低 HIV 感染风险,他们会切除儿子的包皮。
尽管 57%的男性报告存在某种形式的包皮切割,但只有 10%的男性报告完全切除了包皮,这是国际 HIV 预防策略所基于的手术。男性(为自己和儿子)和女性(为儿子)对 MC(完全切除包皮)的接受度较高。潜在的 MC 服务需要响应信仰和习俗的多样性,并考虑卫生系统的限制。鉴于 PNG 中纵向切割的规模,需要大力研究纵向切割对 HIV 感染的潜在保护作用。