Beladan Carmen C, Popescu Bogdan A, Calin Andreea, Rosca Monica, Matei Florin, Gurzun Maria-Magdalena, Popara Anca V, Curea Fabiana, Ginghina Carmen
"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania; "Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu" Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bucharest, Romania.
Echocardiography. 2014 Mar;31(3):325-34. doi: 10.1111/echo.12362. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is as an independent risk factor. Discrepancies were reported between LV mass (LVM) estimated by echocardiography and electrocardiography (ECG) findings. We hypothesized that QRS voltage criteria may reflect not only anatomical changes (LVM) but also changes in LV function and we tested the relationship between QRS voltage and echocardiographic parameters of LV function in patients (pts) with different types of LVH.
We prospectively enrolled pts with LVH and preserved ejection fraction (LVEF >50%): 20 pts with isolated arterial hypertension, HTN, 20 pts with severe aortic stenosis, AS (indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm(2)/m(2)), and 20 pts with symmetric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, HCM. Standard 12-lead ECG (including Sokolow and Cornell voltage indices) and a comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography were performed in all. Left ventricular mass was calculated according to Devereux formula. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography.
A significant correlation was found between both ECG indices and LVM assessed by echocardiography. Moreover, significant correlations were found between Sokolow-Lyon voltage and LVEF (r = 0.26; P = 0.03), GLS (r = 0.59; P < 0.001) and E/e' average (r = 0.43; P < 0.001). Cornell voltage index correlated significantly only with GLS. In multivariable analysis GLS emerged as the only independent correlate of both Sokolow-Lyon (ß = 0.6, P < 0.001) and Cornell voltage indices (ß = 0.45, P < 0.001).
These findings suggest that in pts with LVH, ECG should no longer be used only as a surrogate method for LVM estimation (structural changes only), but rather as an investigation complementary to imaging, incorporating information on overall LV remodeling (changes in structure and function).
左心室肥厚(LVH)是一个独立的危险因素。据报道,超声心动图估算的左心室质量(LVM)与心电图(ECG)结果之间存在差异。我们推测QRS电压标准不仅可能反映解剖学变化(LVM),还可能反映左心室功能的变化,并且我们测试了不同类型左心室肥厚患者中QRS电压与左心室功能超声心动图参数之间的关系。
我们前瞻性纳入了左心室肥厚且射血分数保留(左心室射血分数[LVEF]>50%)的患者:20例单纯动脉高血压(HTN)患者、20例严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS,主动脉瓣面积指数<0.6 cm²/m²)患者和20例对称性肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者。对所有患者均进行标准12导联心电图检查(包括索科洛夫和康奈尔电压指数)和全面的二维(2D)超声心动图检查。根据德弗罗公式计算左心室质量。通过斑点追踪超声心动图评估整体纵向应变(GLS)。
发现心电图指数与超声心动图评估的LVM之间存在显著相关性。此外,索科洛夫 - 里昂电压与LVEF(r = 0.26;P = 0.03)、GLS(r = 0.59;P < 0.001)和E/e'平均值(r = 0.43;P < 0.001)之间存在显著相关性。康奈尔电压指数仅与GLS显著相关。在多变量分析中,GLS成为索科洛夫 - 里昂电压指数(β = 0.6,P < 0.001)和康奈尔电压指数(β = 0.45,P < 0.001)的唯一独立相关因素。
这些发现表明,在左心室肥厚患者中,心电图不应再仅用作LVM估算的替代方法(仅结构变化),而应作为成像的补充检查,纳入有关左心室整体重塑(结构和功能变化)的信息。