Mahn James J, Dubey Elizabeth, Brody Aaron, Welch Robert, Zalenski Robert, Flack John M, Ference Brian, Levy Phillip D
The Wayne State University School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; The Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):996-1002. doi: 10.1111/acem.12462.
The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic test characteristics of three validated electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in undifferentiated, asymptomatic emergency department (ED) patients with hypertension (HTN).
This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients with asymptomatic HTN at a single tertiary care facility. Patients 35 years of age or older with systolic blood pressure (sBP) ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (dBP) ≥ 90 mm Hg on two separate readings (at least 1 hour apart) were eligible for inclusion. At enrollment, ECGs were obtained for all patients. Presence of LVH on ECG was defined using Cornell voltage, Cornell product, and Minnesota Code 3.1/3.2 criteria. Echocardiography was then performed, with LVH defined by the presence of one or more of the following validated criteria: interventricular septal or posterior wall thickness ≥ 1.3 cm, LV mass ≥ 225 g (male) or ≥ 163 g (female), or LV mass indexed to height raised to the power of 2.7 ≥ 48 g/m(2.7) (male) or ≥ 45 g/m(2.7) (female). Descriptive statistics and diagnostic characteristics (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each of the three ECG criteria were derived for both the composite and the individual echocardiographic determinants of LVH. Logistic regression was also used to model LVH before and after subsequent inclusion of clinically relevant variables.
A total of 161 patients (93.8% African American; mean [±SD] age = 49.8 [±8.3] years) were enrolled, and LVH was present in 89 patients (55.2%, 95% CI = 47.6% to 62.8%). On ECG analysis, mean Cornell voltage (21.5 mV vs. 28.7 mV; difference = -7.2 mV, 95% CI = -3.8 to -10.7 mV) and Cornell product (1868.4 msec × mV vs. 2616.4 msec × mV; difference = -748.0 msec × mV, 95% CI = -401.2 to -1094.8 msec × mV) were significantly lower among those without LVH on echocardiography. Subjects without LVH on echocardiography were less likely to meet Cornell voltage (30.5% vs. 48.3%; difference = -17.8%, 95% CI = -2.5% to -31.7%) or Cornell product (26.4% vs. 49.4%; difference = -23.0%, 95% CI = -8.0% to -36.5%) criteria for LVH. The diagnosis of LVH by Minnesota Code was less common (18.1% vs. 25.8%; difference = -7.7%, 95% CI = -20.1% to 5.3%) with no difference by group. Sensitivity and specificity were as follows: for the Cornell voltage, sensitivity 25.4% (95% CI = 15.3% to 37.9%), specificity 50.0% (95% CI = 67.6% to 93.2%); for the Cornell product, sensitivity 25.4% (95% CI = 15.3% to 37.9%), specificity 75.0% (95% CI = 19.4% to 99.4%); and for the Minnesota code, sensitivity 26.9% (95% CI = 16.6% to 39.7%), specificity 75.0% (95% CI = 19.4% to 99.4%). On logistic regression, the c-statistics for Cornell voltage and Cornell product were equivalent (0.67), with only marginal improvement after the addition of body mass index (BMI; 0.69 and 0.70, respectively), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP; 0.68 and 0.69, respectively), or both (0.71 and 0.72, respectively) to the models.
In this cohort of predominately African American ED patients with asymptomatic HTN, sensitivity and specificity of standard ECG criteria were relatively poor for the diagnosis of LVH on echocardiography. Thus, ECG is of limited use for LVH risk stratification in asymptomatic ED patients with elevated blood pressure, with additional clinical information only modestly strengthening its predictive value.
本研究旨在评估三种经验证的心电图(ECG)标准对未分化、无症状的急诊科(ED)高血压(HTN)患者左心室肥厚(LVH)的诊断测试特征。
这是一项在单一三级医疗机构对无症状HTN的ED患者进行的前瞻性队列研究。年龄35岁及以上,收缩压(sBP)≥140 mmHg或舒张压(dBP)≥90 mmHg,且两次独立测量(间隔至少1小时)均达此标准的患者符合纳入条件。入组时,为所有患者进行心电图检查。根据康奈尔电压、康奈尔乘积和明尼苏达编码3.1/3.2标准定义心电图上LVH的存在情况。随后进行超声心动图检查,LVH的定义为符合以下一项或多项经验证标准:室间隔或后壁厚度≥1.3 cm、左心室质量≥225 g(男性)或≥163 g(女性),或左心室质量指数(身高的2.7次幂)≥48 g/m(2.7)(男性)或≥45 g/m(2.7)(女性)。针对LVH的综合及各个超声心动图决定因素,得出三种ECG标准各自的描述性统计数据及诊断特征(即敏感性和特异性),并给出相应的95%置信区间(CI)。还使用逻辑回归对纳入临床相关变量前后的LVH进行建模。
共纳入161例患者(93.8%为非裔美国人;平均[±标准差]年龄 = 49.8 [±8.3]岁),其中89例(55.2%,95% CI = 47.6%至62.8%)存在LVH。心电图分析显示,超声心动图检查无LVH的患者,其平均康奈尔电压(21.5 mV对28.7 mV;差值 = -7.2 mV,95% CI = -3.8至-10.7 mV)和康奈尔乘积(1868.4 msec×mV对2616.4 msec×mV;差值 = -748.0 msec×mV,95% CI = -401.2至-1094.8 msec×mV)显著更低。超声心动图检查无LVH的受试者,符合康奈尔电压(30.5%对48.3%;差值 = -17.8%,95% CI = -2.5%至-31.7%)或康奈尔乘积(26.4%对49.4%;差值 = -23.0%,95% CI = -8.0%至-36.5%)LVH标准的可能性较小。明尼苏达编码诊断LVH的情况较少见(18.1%对25.8%;差值 = -7.7%,95% CI = -20.1%至5.3%),两组间无差异。敏感性和特异性如下:康奈尔电压标准,敏感性25.4%(95% CI = 15.3%至37.9%),特异性50.0%(95% CI = 67.6%至93.2%);康奈尔乘积标准,敏感性25.4%(95% CI = 15.3%至37.9%),特异性75.0%(95% CI = 19.4%至99.4%);明尼苏达编码标准,敏感性26.9%(95% CI = 16.6%至39.7%),特异性75.0%(95% CI = 19.4%至99.4%)。逻辑回归分析显示,康奈尔电压和康奈尔乘积的c统计量相等(0.67),在模型中加入体重指数(BMI;分别为0.69和0.70)、B型利钠肽(BNP;分别为0.68和0.69)或两者(分别为0.71和0.72)后,仅略有改善。
在这个以非裔美国人为主的无症状HTN的ED患者队列中,标准心电图标准对超声心动图诊断LVH的敏感性和特异性相对较差。因此,心电图在无症状血压升高的ED患者LVH风险分层中的作用有限,仅增加临床信息对其预测价值的提升幅度不大。