Macedo Etienne, Mehta Ravindra L
Division of Nephrology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Semin Dial. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):675-81. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12128. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
The decision to provide dialytic support and choosing the ideal moment to initiate therapy are common impasses for physicians treating patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Although renal replacement therapy (RRT) has been extensively used in clinical practice for more than 30 years, there is a paucity of evidence to guide clinicians on the optimal utilization of RRT in AKI. In the absence of traditional or urgent indications, there is no consensus on whether dialysis should be offered and when it should be started. The lack of agreed-upon parameters to guide the decision, the fear of the risk of the procedure, and the possible contribution to worse prognosis with RRT have resulted in a considerable variation in practice among physicians and centers. In this review, we summarize the evidence evaluating time of initiation of RRT and discuss possible approaches for future trials in addressing this issue.
对于治疗急性肾损伤(AKI)患者的医生而言,决定是否提供透析支持以及选择开始治疗的理想时机是常见的难题。尽管肾脏替代疗法(RRT)已在临床实践中广泛应用30多年,但缺乏证据来指导临床医生在AKI中最佳地使用RRT。在没有传统或紧急指征的情况下,对于是否应进行透析以及何时开始透析尚无共识。缺乏商定的参数来指导决策、对该操作风险的担忧以及RRT可能导致更差预后,导致医生和中心之间的实践存在很大差异。在本综述中,我们总结了评估RRT开始时间的证据,并讨论未来试验解决该问题的可能方法。