• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[宫颈腺上皮内瘤变的诊断方法]

[Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia].

作者信息

Yang Shu-li, Kong Wei-min, Wu Yu-mei, Duan Wei, Zhu Li

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;48(5):344-7.

PMID:24016476
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) for improving the diagnostic levels of CGIN.

METHODS

Clinical data of 106 cases with CGIN admitted in hospital from Jan.2008 to Dec. 2010 were analyzed retrospectively.All data from preoperative thin-prep cytologic test (TCT), cervical biopsies and postoperative pathological examination of the excised cervical tissues were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients, 62 cases (58.5%, 62/106) were low grade CGIN (L-CGIN), 44 cases (41.5%, 44/106) were high grade CGIN (H-CGIN); 25 cases (23.6%, 25/106) were pure CGIN and 81 cases (76.4%, 81/106) were CGIN mixed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Fifteen cases (14.2%, 15/106) were found atypical glandular cell (AGC) by TCT. In the 15 cases, there were 4 cases (6.5%, 4/62) L-CGIN, and 11 cases (25.0%, 11/44) H-CGIN, there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); among 15 cases with AGC, 11 cases of them (44.0%, 11/25) were pure CGIN, 4 cases (4.9%, 4/81) mixed with CIN, in which there were significant difference (P < 0.01).Seven cases (25.0%, 7/28) were detected glandular lesions in 28 cases by endocervical curettage (ECC). Totally 23 cases (22.8%, 23/101) were detected CGIN by colposcopy-directed biopsy, 11 cases (19.0%, 11/58) were with L-CGIN, 12 cases (27.9%, 12/43) H-CGIN, there was no significant difference between them (P > 0.05).Among the 23 cases, 13 cases (52.0%, 13/25) were pure CGIN, 10 cases (12.3%, 10/81) CGIN mixed with CIN, which showed significant difference (P < 0.01). All 106 patients were treated, 101 cases treated with cervical conization and 5 cases performed hysterectomy; 23 cases were diagnosed CGIN preoperation, the ratio of preoperative diagnosis was 21.7% (23/106), 83 cases (80.3%, 83/106) diagnosed postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine diagnostic methods of CGIN were not satisfaction, most CGIN were diagnosed after cervical resection.Cervical conization may play a very important role in diagnosis of CGIN.The positivity of TCT in H-CGIN was higher than L-CGIN. There was no different in diagnosing different CGIN grades by colposcopy-directed biopsy. The ratio of preoperative diagnosis of pure CGIN was higher than those with CGIN mixed with CIN.

摘要

目的

探讨宫颈腺上皮内瘤变(CGIN)的诊断方法,以提高CGIN的诊断水平。

方法

回顾性分析2008年1月至2010年12月收治的106例CGIN患者的临床资料。复习术前薄层液基细胞学检测(TCT)、宫颈活检及术后切除宫颈组织病理检查的所有数据。

结果

106例患者中,低级别CGIN(L-CGIN)62例(58.5%,62/106),高级别CGIN(H-CGIN)44例(41.5%,44/106);单纯CGIN 25例(23.6%,25/106),CGIN合并宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)81例(76.4%,81/106)。TCT检查发现非典型腺细胞(AGC)15例(14.2%,15/106)。15例中,L-CGIN 4例(6.5%,4/62),H-CGIN 11例(25.0%,11/44),两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);15例AGC患者中,单纯CGIN 11例(44.0%,11/25),合并CIN 4例(4.9%,4/81),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。宫颈管搔刮术(ECC)检查28例,发现腺性病变7例(25.0%,7/28)。阴道镜下活检确诊CGIN 23例(22.8%,23/101),L-CGIN 11例(19.0%,11/58),H-CGIN 12例(27.9%,12/43),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。23例中,单纯CGIN 13例(52.0%,13/25),合并CIN 10例(12.3% , 10/81),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。106例患者均接受治疗,101例行宫颈锥切术,5例行子宫切除术;术前确诊CGIN患者23例,术前诊断率为21.7%(23/106),术后确诊83例(80.3%,83/106)。

结论

CGIN的常规诊断方法不尽人意,多数CGIN在宫颈切除术后确诊。宫颈锥切术在CGIN诊断中可能起重要作用。H-CGIN的TCT阳性率高于L-CGIN。阴道镜下活检诊断不同级别CGIN无差异。单纯CGIN的术前诊断率高于合并CIN的CGIN。

相似文献

1
[Diagnostic approaches of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia].[宫颈腺上皮内瘤变的诊断方法]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 May;48(5):344-7.
2
Study of clinical diagnosis of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈腺上皮内瘤变的临床诊断研究
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2016 Aug;37(4):539-542.
3
Detection of occult endocervical glandular dysplasia in cervical conization specimens for squamous lesions.宫颈锥切标本中鳞状病变隐匿性宫颈管腺上皮发育异常的检测
Pathol Res Pract. 2017 Mar;213(3):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2016.12.015. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.在对ThinPrep标本上非典型腺细胞进行细胞组织学检查时,多种腺体病变与高级别鳞状上皮内病变并存。
Cytopathology. 2009 Dec;20(6):351-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00568.x. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
5
Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.宫颈管搔刮术诊断的宫颈上皮内瘤变 1 级行宫颈锥切术的高级别组织学诊断风险:病例对照研究。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020 Jul;24(3):247-251. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000541.
6
The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.宫颈细胞学和阴道镜检查在检测宫颈腺性肿瘤中的作用。
Cytopathology. 2009 Dec;20(6):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2008.00566.x. Epub 2008 Jun 28.
7
Are we managing our patients correctly following treatment for cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia? A review of practice at the Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit.我们在治疗宫颈腺上皮内瘤变后对患者的管理是否正确?杰索普翼阴道镜单位实践回顾。
Cytopathology. 2021 Nov;32(6):758-765. doi: 10.1111/cyt.13044. Epub 2021 Sep 5.
8
[Cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia topography and the risk of conisation].[宫颈腺上皮内瘤变的部位与锥切风险]
Ginekol Pol. 2005 Oct;76(10):763-9.
9
Relation of cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia to microinvasive and invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a study of 121 cases.子宫颈腺上皮内瘤变与子宫颈微浸润腺癌和浸润性腺癌的关系:121例研究
J Clin Pathol. 1999 Feb;52(2):112-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.52.2.112.
10
Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.阴道镜指导下活检后行随机活检可提高宫颈上皮内瘤变 2 级及以上病变的诊断率。
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2010 Oct;14(4):346-51. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3181e9635b.