• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women).将一项随机临床试验嵌入到现有的注册研究基础设施中:通过 Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women) 研究设计提高效率的独特机会。
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):421-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
2
A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.一项基于注册的随机临床试验比较了女性行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉和股动脉入路:SAFE-PCI for Women(女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗入路增强研究)试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):857-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007.
3
Comparison of Rates of Bleeding and Vascular Complications Before, During, and After Trial Enrollment in the SAFE-PCI Trial for Women.比较 SAFE-PCI 试验中女性患者入组前、入组时和入组后出血和血管并发症的发生率。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May;12(5):e007086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007086.
4
Safety of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the radial versus femoral route in patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with warfarin.在接受华法林持续口服抗凝治疗的患者中,经桡动脉与股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性。
Am Heart J. 2014 Oct;168(4):537-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
5
Comparison of Radial Access, Guided Femoral Access, and Non-Guided Femoral Access Among Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的女性中桡动脉入路、引导下股动脉入路和非引导下股动脉入路的比较。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jan;30(1):18-22. Epub 2017 Oct 15.
6
Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).女性急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉造影/介入治疗时的桡动脉与股动脉入路:来自 RIVAL 试验(冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉与股动脉入路比较)的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.11.017.
7
Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉入路的采用和与股动脉入路的结果比较:国家心血管数据登记处(2007-2012 年)的最新报告。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.
8
The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011).经桡动脉行 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的流行率和结局:来自国家心血管数据注册中心(2007 年至 2011 年)的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.032. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
9
Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.经溶栓治疗后行补救性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中行桡动脉入路与股动脉入路的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.028.
10
Prevalence and outcomes of trans-radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practise.当代实践中经桡动脉途径进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率及结果
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:264-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.099. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
A NSQIP-Based Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics for Pancreaticoduodenectomy.基于 NSQIP 的随机临床试验评估胰腺十二指肠切除术预防性抗生素的选择。
Cancer Treat Res. 2024;192:131-145. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_7.
2
The role of early-phase trials and real-world evidence in drug development.早期临床试验和真实世界证据在药物研发中的作用。
Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024 Feb;3(2):110-117. doi: 10.1038/s44161-024-00420-4. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Rates, predictors, and causes of readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后再入院率、预测因素及原因
World J Cardiol. 2024 Jul 26;16(7):402-411. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i7.402.
4
Development of a conceptual framework for defining trial efficiency.定义试验效率的概念框架的发展。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0304187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304187. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluating registry-based trial economics: Results from the STRESS clinical trial.评估基于注册库的试验经济学:应激临床试验的结果。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jan 10;38:101257. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101257. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Sex-Based Differences in 30-Day Readmissions After Cardiac Arrest: Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database.基于性别的心脏骤停后 30 天再入院差异:全国再入院数据库分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Sep 20;11(18):e025779. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025779. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Determining value of Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs): a case of transcatheter valve therapies.确定协调注册网络(CRNs)的价值:以经导管瓣膜治疗为例。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Jul 4;1(1):e000003. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000003. eCollection 2019.
8
A NSQIP-based randomized clinical trial evaluating choice of prophylactic antibiotics for pancreaticoduodenectomy.一项基于 NSQIP 的随机临床试验,评估胰腺十二指肠切除术预防性抗生素的选择。
J Surg Oncol. 2021 May;123(6):1387-1394. doi: 10.1002/jso.26402.
9
Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review.美国临床试验中使用真实世界数据的当代应用:范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jan 15;28(1):144-154. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa224.
10
Innovation in the design of large-scale hybrid randomized clinical trials.大规模混合随机临床试验设计中的创新。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;99:106178. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106178. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉入路的采用和与股动脉入路的结果比较:国家心血管数据登记处(2007-2012 年)的最新报告。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.
2
Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.男性和女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后避免出血策略的使用模式和比较效果:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的观察性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 21;61(20):2070-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.030. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
3
TransRadial Education and Therapeutics (TREAT): shifting the balance of safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.经桡动脉教育和治疗(TREAT):改变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗血栓药物的安全性和有效性的平衡:来自心脏安全研究联盟的报告。
Am Heart J. 2013 Mar;165(3):344-53.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.008.
4
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照在 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的研究:RIFLE-STEACS(ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照研究)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
5
Current operator volumes of invasive coronary procedures in Medicare patients: implications for future manpower needs in the catheterization laboratory.在 Medicare 患者中进行有创性冠状动脉手术的当前操作人员数量:对导管实验室未来人力需求的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan 1;81(1):34-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24366. Epub 2012 May 2.
6
Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.心血管临床试验的标准化出血定义:出血学术研究联盟的共识报告。
Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449.
7
Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机、平行分组、多中心试验(RIVAL)
Lancet. 2011 Apr 23;377(9775):1409-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
8
Incidence, prognostic impact, and influence of antithrombotic therapy on access and nonaccess site bleeding in percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中抗栓治疗的发生率、预后影响以及对入路和非入路部位出血的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Feb;4(2):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.011.
9
Significantly improved vascular complications among women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Northern New England Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中血管并发症显著改善:来自新英格兰北部经皮冠状动脉介入治疗登记处的报告。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Oct;2(5):423-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.860494. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
10
Bleeding, blood transfusion, and increased mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for contemporary practice.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的出血、输血与死亡率增加:对当代实践的影响
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 2;53(22):2019-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.073.

将一项随机临床试验嵌入到现有的注册研究基础设施中:通过 Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women) 研究设计提高效率的独特机会。

Embedding a randomized clinical trial into an ongoing registry infrastructure: unique opportunities for efficiency in design of the Study of Access site For Enhancement of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Women (SAFE-PCI for Women).

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):421-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.013
PMID:24016489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4169992/
Abstract

Women are at higher risk than men for bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Compared with femoral access, radial access reduces these complications but may be more challenging in women because of higher rates of radial artery spasm, tortuosity, and occlusion as well as lower rates of procedure success. Whether the safety advantages of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing PCI are outweighed by reduced effectiveness has not been studied. The Study of Access site For Enhancement of PCI for Women is a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing radial with femoral arterial access in women undergoing PCI. In conjunction with the US Food and Drug Administration's Critical Path Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, this study embeds the randomized clinical trial into the existing infrastructure of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry through the National Institute of Health's National Cardiovascular Research Infrastructure. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 2, 3, or 5) or vascular complication requiring intervention occurring at 72 hours after PCI or by hospital discharge. The primary feasibility end point is procedure success. Secondary end points include procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation dose, quality of life, and a composite of 30-day death, vascular complication, or unplanned revascularization.

摘要

女性在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后出血和血管并发症的风险高于男性。与股动脉入路相比,桡动脉入路可降低这些并发症,但由于桡动脉痉挛、迂曲和闭塞的发生率较高,以及手术成功率较低,在女性中可能更具挑战性。在接受 PCI 的女性中,桡动脉与股动脉入路的安全性优势是否超过疗效降低,尚未得到研究。女性 PCI 中的经桡动脉入路增强研究(Study of Access site For Enhancement of PCI for Women)是一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,比较了女性 PCI 中桡动脉与股动脉入路。该研究与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的关键路径心血管安全研究联盟(Critical Path Cardiac Safety Research Consortium)合作,通过美国国立卫生研究院(National Institute of Health)的国家心血管研究基础设施,将随机临床试验嵌入现有的国家心血管数据登记处 CathPCI 登记处的基础设施中。主要疗效终点是 PCI 后 72 小时内或出院时发生的出血(Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 类型 2、3 或 5)或需要干预的血管并发症的复合终点。主要可行性终点是手术成功率。次要终点包括手术持续时间、造影剂用量、辐射剂量、生活质量以及 30 天内死亡、血管并发症或计划外血运重建的复合终点。