Suppr超能文献

多民族人群中红细胞分布宽度和高敏 C 反应蛋白对冠心病死亡率预测的比较分析:来自 1999-2004 年 NHANES 的研究结果。

Comparative analysis of red cell distribution width and high sensitivity C-reactive protein for coronary heart disease mortality prediction in multi-ethnic population: findings from the 1999-2004 NHANES.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;168(6):5156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.109. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Red cell distribution width (RDW) has been shown to predict all-cause and cardiovascular (CVD) mortality. However, the predictive ability of RDW for future coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in comparison to high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) has not been assessed in a population cohort free of CVD.

METHODS

Analysis was performed on 8,513 adult participants (age > 20 years) free of CVD from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004. Cox-proportional hazard analyses were used to assess the role of RDW and hs-CRP in CHD mortality and in subgroups based on high and low RDW and hs-CRP.

RESULTS

On adjustment for traditional risk factors (age, sex, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipid lowering therapy, smoking, diabetes mellitus, anemia, mean corpuscular volume and nutritional deficiencies), RDW [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.12-1.42] p < 0.001] remained an independent predictor, while hs-CRP [HR 1.18 95% CI [0.98-1.41] p = 0.077] did not. On comparative analysis, high RDW (> 12.6%) was predictive of CHD mortality irrespective of hs-CRP status [hs-CRP ≤ 3 mg/L (HR 1.17 95% CI [1.01-1.36] p = 0.031)] and hs-CRP > 3 mg/L (HR 1.44 95% CI [1.23-1.68] p < 0.001). Hs-CRP was not predictive in either high or low RDW subgroup.

CONCLUSION

RDW but not hs-CRP was associated with CHD mortality independent of traditional risk factors in a cohort with no pre-existing CVD. RDW may be considered a stronger biomarker for CHD death than hs-CRP and needs further prospective evaluation in CVD risk assessment.

摘要

背景

红细胞分布宽度(RDW)已被证明可预测全因和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率。然而,在没有 CVD 的人群队列中,尚未评估 RDW 与高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)相比对未来冠心病(CHD)死亡率的预测能力。

方法

对 1999-2004 年国家健康和营养调查中 8513 名无 CVD 的成年参与者(年龄>20 岁)进行了分析。使用 Cox 比例风险分析评估 RDW 和 hs-CRP 在 CHD 死亡率中的作用,以及基于高和低 RDW 和 hs-CRP 的亚组。

结果

在调整传统危险因素(年龄、性别、收缩压、降压药物使用、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、降脂治疗、吸烟、糖尿病、贫血、平均红细胞体积和营养缺乏)后,RDW[危险比(HR)1.26,95%置信区间(CI)[1.12-1.42],p<0.001]仍然是一个独立的预测因素,而 hs-CRP[HR 1.18,95%CI [0.98-1.41],p=0.077]则不是。在比较分析中,无论 hs-CRP 状态如何,高 RDW(>12.6%)均可预测 CHD 死亡率[hs-CRP≤3mg/L(HR 1.17,95%CI [1.01-1.36],p=0.031)]和 hs-CRP>3mg/L(HR 1.44,95%CI [1.23-1.68],p<0.001)。hs-CRP 在高或低 RDW 亚组中均无预测作用。

结论

RDW 与传统危险因素独立相关,hs-CRP 则不然,与无先前 CVD 的队列中 CHD 死亡率相关。RDW 可能比 hs-CRP 更能预测 CHD 死亡,需要在 CVD 风险评估中进一步进行前瞻性评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验