• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口与传统胆囊切除术的住院医师培训

Resident training in single-incision compared with traditional cholecystectomy.

作者信息

Daly Shaun C, Hooper Elizabeth A, Rinewalt Daniel, Myers Jonathan A, Millikan Keith W, Luu Minh

机构信息

Departments of General Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1635 West Harrison, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):361-4. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521791.

DOI:10.4293/108680813X13693422521791
PMID:24018069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3771751/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As attending surgeons' comfort with single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) grows, and with continued improvement in surgical instruments, advanced laparoscopic techniques are increasingly being incorporated into surgical training. The aim of our study was to evaluate resident performance and patient outcomes in patients undergoing resident-performed SILS versus a resident-performed traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study of 80 patients undergoing elective surgical intervention with a resident-performed SILS (n = 20) or a resident-performed traditional LC (n = 60) for gallbladder disease over a 15-month period was performed. Surgical indications, common perioperative variables, complications, and length of stay were reviewed, and all variables were evaluated for statistical significance.

RESULTS

Median operative times were similar for the resident-performed SILS cohort and the resident-performed traditional LC cohort (70.0 minutes and 66.0 minutes, respectively; P = .54). There were no complications in either the resident-performed SILS or resident-performed traditional LC groups. There was no difference in mean length of hospital stay between the resident-performed SILS group and resident-performed traditional LC group (0.95 days and 1.10 days, respectively; P = .50).

CONCLUSION

Our data strongly support the ability to train senior residents to complete a SILS technique safely and with the same efficacy as with traditional LC.

摘要

引言

随着主刀外科医生对单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)的操作越来越熟练,并且手术器械不断改进,先进的腹腔镜技术越来越多地被纳入外科培训中。我们研究的目的是评估由住院医师实施的SILS手术与由住院医师实施的传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者中住院医师的操作表现和患者预后。

方法

进行了一项回顾性病例对照研究,研究对象为80例在15个月期间因胆囊疾病接受由住院医师实施的SILS手术(n = 20)或由住院医师实施的传统LC手术(n = 60)的择期手术干预的患者。回顾了手术指征、常见围手术期变量、并发症和住院时间,并对所有变量进行统计学意义评估。

结果

由住院医师实施的SILS队列和由住院医师实施的传统LC队列的中位手术时间相似(分别为70.0分钟和66.0分钟;P = 0.54)。由住院医师实施的SILS组和由住院医师实施的传统LC组均未出现并发症。由住院医师实施的SILS组和由住院医师实施的传统LC组之间的平均住院时间无差异(分别为0.95天和1.10天;P = 0.50)。

结论

我们的数据有力地支持了培训高年级住院医师安全完成SILS技术并达到与传统LC相同疗效的能力。

相似文献

1
Resident training in single-incision compared with traditional cholecystectomy.单切口与传统胆囊切除术的住院医师培训
JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):361-4. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521791.
2
The Effect of Afternoon Operative Sessions of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Performed by Senior Surgeons on the General Surgery Residency Program: A Comparative Study.资深外科医生进行的腹腔镜胆囊切除术下午手术时段对普通外科住院医师培训项目的影响:一项对比研究
J Surg Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;72(5):1014-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 May 14.
3
Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.住院医师和主治医生资历对腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术操作的影响。
J Surg Res. 2006 May 15;132(2):159-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.578. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
4
Effect of Residents on Operative Time and Complications: Focus on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Community.住院医师对手术时间和并发症的影响:聚焦社区腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Surg Educ. 2016 Sep-Oct;73(5):836-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.005. Epub 2016 May 18.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.单孔腹腔镜手术作为一种教学术式:单中心超2100例手术的经验
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
6
Comparative study: single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and conventional three-ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy.对比研究:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术
J Med Assoc Thai. 2013 Sep;96(9):1143-6.
7
Can residents safely and efficiently be taught single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy?能否安全有效地教授住院医师进行单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术?
J Surg Educ. 2012 Jul-Aug;69(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 May 5.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy learning curve experience seen in a single institution.单机构中观察到的单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术学习曲线经验。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Apr;22(2):114-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31824799ef.
9
Advanced laparoscopic fellowship training decreases conversion rates during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute biliary diseases: a retrospective cohort study.高级腹腔镜专科医师培训可降低急性胆道疾病腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jan;13:221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.016. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
10
Analysis of perioperative factors and cost comparison of single-incision and traditional multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.分析单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的围手术期因素和成本比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2428-8. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a teaching procedure: a single-center experience of more than 2100 procedures.单孔腹腔镜手术作为一种教学术式:单中心超2100例手术的经验
Surg Today. 2016 Nov;46(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1315-7. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for biliary tract disease.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗胆道疾病。
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 14;22(2):736-47. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.736.
3
Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair as a teaching procedure: one center's experience of more than 300 procedures.单切口完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术作为一种教学手术:一个中心超过300例手术的经验。
Surg Today. 2016 Sep;46(9):1039-44. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1273-5. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)与传统多孔胆囊切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
2
Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Sep;202(3):254-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
3
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC)-a matched pair analysis.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的配对分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;396(6):819-24. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0817-4. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
4
Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILS)的学习曲线:80 例良性胆囊疾病患者的初步研究。
World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1144-1.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon's initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:56 例连续病例的外科医生初步经验及文献复习。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Mar;14(3):506-10. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1116-z. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
6
Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?在安大略省,腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否改变了医疗实践模式和患者预后?
CMAJ. 1996 Feb 15;154(4):491-500.
7
The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the operative experience of surgical residents.腹腔镜胆囊切除术对外科住院医师手术经验的影响。
Surg Endosc. 1993 Jan-Feb;7(1):17-21. doi: 10.1007/BF00591230.
8
Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术引入后胆囊切除术率增加。
JAMA. 1993;270(12):1429-32.
9
Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.马里兰州开腹和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术率及手术死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):403-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300607.
10
Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
NIH Consens Statement. 1992;10(3):1-28.