Suppr超能文献

自费生育患者的费用:来自多中心前瞻性不孕队列的数据。

Out-of-pocket fertility patient expense: data from a multicenter prospective infertility cohort.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.083. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The high costs of fertility care may deter couples from seeking care. Urologists often are asked about the costs of these treatments. To our knowledge previous studies have not addressed the direct out-of-pocket costs to couples. We characterized these expenses in patients seeking fertility care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Couples were prospectively recruited from 8 community and academic reproductive endocrinology clinics. Each participating couple completed face-to-face or telephone interviews and cost diaries at study enrollment, and 4, 10 and 18 months of care. We determined overall out-of-pocket costs, in addition to relationships between out-of-pocket costs and treatment type, clinical outcomes and socioeconomic characteristics on multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 332 couples completed cost diaries and had data available on treatment and outcomes. Average age was 36.8 and 35.6 years in men and women, respectively. Of this cohort 19% received noncycle based therapy, 4% used ovulation induction medication only, 22% underwent intrauterine insemination and 55% underwent in vitro fertilization. The median overall out-of-pocket expense was $5,338 (IQR 1,197-19,840). Couples using medication only had the lowest median out-of-pocket expenses at $912 while those using in vitro fertilization had the highest at $19,234. After multivariate adjustment the out-of-pocket expense was not significantly associated with successful pregnancy. On multivariate analysis couples treated with in vitro fertilization spent an average of $15,435 more than those treated with intrauterine insemination. Couples spent about $6,955 for each additional in vitro fertilization cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide real-world estimates of out-of-pocket costs, which can be used to help couples plan for expenses that they may incur with treatment.

摘要

目的

生育护理费用高昂可能会阻碍夫妇寻求护理。泌尿科医生经常被问到这些治疗的费用。据我们所知,之前的研究尚未涉及夫妇的直接自付费用。我们描述了寻求生育护理的患者的这些费用。

材料和方法

从 8 个社区和学术生殖内分泌诊所前瞻性招募夫妇。每对参与的夫妇在研究入组时以及治疗的 4、10 和 18 个月时完成面对面或电话访谈和费用日记。我们在多元线性回归分析中确定了总自付费用,以及自付费用与治疗类型、临床结局和社会经济特征之间的关系。

结果

共有 332 对夫妇完成了费用日记,并且有关于治疗和结局的数据。男性和女性的平均年龄分别为 36.8 岁和 35.6 岁。该队列中,19%接受非周期治疗,4%仅使用促排卵药物,22%进行宫腔内人工授精,55%进行体外受精。总自付费用中位数为 5338 美元(IQR 1197-19840)。仅使用药物的夫妇自付费用最低,中位数为 912 美元,而使用体外受精的夫妇自付费用最高,为 19234 美元。多元调整后,自付费用与妊娠成功无显著相关性。在多元分析中,接受体外受精治疗的夫妇比接受宫腔内人工授精治疗的夫妇平均多花费 15435 美元。每增加一个体外受精周期,夫妇花费约 6955 美元。

结论

这些数据提供了自付费用的真实世界估计,可以帮助夫妇计划治疗可能产生的费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验