• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不明原因不孕夫妇中,计划单胚胎移植的 IVF 与卵巢刺激的 IUI 比较:一项经济学分析。

IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Medical Center, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.021
PMID:24456703
Abstract

Couples with unexplained subfertility are often treated with intrauterine insemination (IUI) with ovarian stimulation, which carries the risk of multiple pregnancies. An explorative randomized controlled trial was performed comparing one cycle of IVF with elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) versus three cycles of IUI-ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, to assess the economic burden of the treatment modalities. The main outcome measures were ongoing pregnancy rates and costs. This study randomly assigned 58 couples to IVF-eSET and 58 couples to IUI-ovarian stimulation. The ongoing pregnancy rates were 24% in with IVF-eSET versus 21% with IUI-ovarian stimulation, with two and three multiple pregnancies, respectively. The mean cost per included couple was significantly different: €2781 with IVF-eSET and €1876 with IUI-ovarian stimulation (P<0.01). The additional costs per ongoing pregnancy were €2456 for IVF-eSET. In couples with unexplained subfertility, one cycle of IVF-eSET cost an additional €900 per couple compared with three cycles of IUI-ovarian stimulation, for no increase in ongoing pregnancy rates or decrease in multiple pregnancies. When IVF-eSET results in higher ongoing pregnancy rates, IVF would be the preferred treatment. Couples that have been trying to conceive unsuccessfully are often treated with intrauterine insemination (IUI) and medication to improve egg production (ovarian stimulation). This treatment carries the risk of multiple pregnancies like twins. We performed an explorative study among those couples that had a poor prognosis for natural conception. One cycle of IVF with transfer of one selected embryo (elective single-embryo transfer, eSET) was compared with three cycles of IUI-ovarian stimulation. The aim of this study was to assess the economic burden of both treatments. The Main outcome measures were number of good pregnancies above 12weeks and costs. We randomly assigned 58 couples to IVF-eSET and 58 couples to IUI-ovarian stimulation. The ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable: 24% with IVF-eSET versus 21% with IUI-ovarian stimulation. There were two multiple pregnancies with IVF-eSET and three multiple pregnancies with IUI-ovarian stimulation. The mean cost per included couple was significantly different, €2781 with IVF-eSET and €1876 with IUI-ovarian stimulation. The additional costs per ongoing pregnancy were €2456 for IVF-eSET. In couples with unexplained subfertility, one cycle of IVF-eSET costed an additional €900 per couple compared to three cycles of IUI-ovarian stimulation, for no increase in ongoing pregnancy rates or decrease in multiple pregnancies. We conclude that IUI-ovarian stimulation is the preferred treatment to start with. When IVF-eSET results in a higher ongoing pregnancy rate (>38%), IVF would be the preferred treatment.

摘要

对于不明原因不孕的夫妇,常采用宫腔内人工授精(IUI)联合卵巢刺激治疗,但存在多胎妊娠的风险。本探索性随机对照试验比较了不明原因不孕且自然受孕预后不良的夫妇进行一次体外受精(IVF)联合选择性单胚胎移植(eSET)与三次 IUI-卵巢刺激治疗的经济性负担,以评估这两种治疗方法的经济负担。主要结局指标为持续妊娠率和成本。本研究将 58 对夫妇随机分配至 IVF-eSET 组和 IUI-卵巢刺激组。IVF-eSET 组的持续妊娠率为 24%,IUI-卵巢刺激组为 21%,分别有两例和三例多胎妊娠。纳入夫妇的平均成本差异具有统计学意义:IVF-eSET 组为 2781 欧元,IUI-卵巢刺激组为 1876 欧元(P<0.01)。IVF-eSET 的每个持续妊娠的额外成本为 2456 欧元。对于不明原因不孕的夫妇,与三次 IUI-卵巢刺激相比,一次 IVF-eSET 治疗的额外费用为每对夫妇 900 欧元,但持续妊娠率或多胎妊娠率并无增加。当 IVF-eSET 导致更高的持续妊娠率时,IVF 将成为首选治疗方法。那些尝试怀孕但不成功的夫妇通常会接受宫腔内人工授精(IUI)和药物治疗以提高卵子产量(卵巢刺激)。这种治疗方法有双胞胎等多胎妊娠的风险。我们在自然受孕预后不良的夫妇中进行了一项探索性研究。一次体外受精(IVF)联合转移一个选择的胚胎(选择性单胚胎移植,eSET)与三次 IUI-卵巢刺激进行比较。本研究的目的是评估这两种治疗方法的经济负担。主要结局指标为 12 周以上的良好妊娠数和成本。我们将 58 对夫妇随机分配至 IVF-eSET 组和 IUI-卵巢刺激组。IVF-eSET 组的持续妊娠率为 24%,IUI-卵巢刺激组为 21%。IVF-eSET 组有两例多胎妊娠,IUI-卵巢刺激组有三例多胎妊娠。纳入夫妇的平均成本差异具有统计学意义,IVF-eSET 组为 2781 欧元,IUI-卵巢刺激组为 1876 欧元。IVF-eSET 的每个持续妊娠的额外成本为 2456 欧元。对于不明原因不孕的夫妇,与三次 IUI-卵巢刺激相比,一次 IVF-eSET 治疗的额外费用为每对夫妇 900 欧元,但持续妊娠率或多胎妊娠率并无增加。我们的结论是,IUI-卵巢刺激是首选的起始治疗方法。当 IVF-eSET 导致更高的持续妊娠率(>38%)时,IVF 将成为首选治疗方法。

相似文献

1
IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis.不明原因不孕夫妇中,计划单胚胎移植的 IVF 与卵巢刺激的 IUI 比较:一项经济学分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2014 Mar;28(3):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.021. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
2
Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.不明原因不孕且预后不良的夫妇:一项比较体外受精联合选择性单胚胎移植与控制性卵巢刺激下宫腔内人工授精有效性的随机试验。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1107-11.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
3
Is IVF-served two different ways-more cost-effective than IUI with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation?试管婴儿服务有两种不同方式——比控制性卵巢过度刺激下的宫腔内人工授精更具成本效益吗?
Hum Reprod. 2015 Oct;30(10):2331-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev193. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
4
The INeS study: prevention of multiple pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial comparing IUI COH versus IVF e SET versus MNC IVF in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility.INE 研究:预防多胎妊娠:一项比较不明原因或轻度男性不育夫妇中 IUI COH、IVF e SET 和 MNC IVF 的随机对照试验。
BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 18;9:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-35.
5
Long-term outcome in couples with unexplained subfertility and an intermediate prognosis initially randomized between expectant management and immediate treatment.原因不明的不孕夫妇的长期结局,以及最初随机分配到期待治疗和立即治疗之间的中间预后。
Hum Reprod. 2012 Feb;27(2):444-50. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der389. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
6
Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.特发性不孕和男性不育的宫内人工授精或体外受精:一项随机试验和成本效益分析。
Lancet. 2000 Jan 1;355(9197):13-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04002-7.
7
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的体外受精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub2.
8
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因的亚生育力的体外受精
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.
9
Can we identify subfertile couples that benefit from immediate in vitro fertilisation over intrauterine insemination?我们能否识别出相较于宫内授精,从即刻体外受精中获益的亚生育夫妇?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Jul;202:36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
10
Birthweight and other perinatal outcomes of singletons conceived after assisted reproduction compared to natural conceived singletons in couples with unexplained subfertility: follow-up of two randomized clinical trials.辅助生殖技术受孕单胎与不明原因不孕夫妇自然受孕单胎的出生体重及其他围产结局:两项随机临床试验随访。
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):817-825. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa298.

引用本文的文献

1
Ongoing pregnancy rate is associated with trigger-day progesterone level in letrozole/clomiphene intrauterine insemination cycles.在来曲唑/克罗米芬宫内人工授精周期中,持续妊娠率与扳机日孕酮水平相关。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Sep 7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03654-8.
2
Economic evaluations of assisted reproductive technologies in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家辅助生殖技术的经济评价:系统综述。
Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):981-991. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae039.
3
IVF versus IUI with ovarian stimulation for unexplained infertility: a collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis.
体外受精与卵巢刺激的宫腔内人工授精治疗不明原因不孕的比较:一项协作性个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Mar 1;30(2):174-185. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmad033.
4
Should IUI replace IVF as first-line treatment for unexplained infertility? A literature review.是否应该将 IUI 替代 IVF 作为不明原因不孕的一线治疗方法?文献回顾。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02717-1.
5
In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.不明原因不孕的体外受精。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 27;9(9):CD003357. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003357.pub5.
6
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Risks, and Costs for 20,910 Donor In Vitro Fertilization and 16,850 Donor Artificial Insemination Treatment Cycles: A Retrospective Analysis in China.20910个供体体外受精周期与16850个供体人工授精治疗周期的临床结局、风险及成本比较:中国的一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 26;12(3):954. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030954.
7
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.性交或宫腔内人工授精后妊娠的子宫内膜损伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 24;10(10):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub4.
8
The Livebirth Rate Per Fertilization Cycle Is Higher Than The Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Intrauterine Insemination for Patients of Poseidon Group 3 With Unexplained Infertility.每个受精周期的活产率高于不明原因不孕的 Poseidon 组 3 患者宫腔内人工授精的累积活产率。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 1;12:768975. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.768975. eCollection 2021.
9
Intrauterine insemination + controlled ovarian hyperstimulation versus in vitro fertilisation in unexplained infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.宫腔内人工授精联合控制性卵巢超排卵与体外受精在不明原因不孕中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Apr;305(4):805-824. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06277-3. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
Endometrial injury for pregnancy following sexual intercourse or intrauterine insemination.性交或宫腔内人工授精后妊娠的子宫内膜损伤。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 18;3(3):CD011424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011424.pub3.