Chisolm Theresa Hnath, Saunders Gabrielle H, Frederick Melissa T, McArdle Rachel A, Smith Sherri L, Wilson Richard H
Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec;22(2):339-42. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0081).
To examine the role of compliance in the outcomes of computer-based auditory training with the Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) program in Veterans using hearing aids.
The authors examined available LACE training data for 5 tasks (i.e., speech-in-babble, time compression, competing speaker, auditory memory, missing word) from 50 hearing-aid users who participated in a larger, randomized controlled trial designed to examine the efficacy of LACE training. The goals were to determine: (a) whether there were changes in performance over 20 training sessions on trained tasks (i.e., on-task outcomes); and (b) whether compliance, defined as completing all 20 sessions, vs. noncompliance, defined as completing less than 20 sessions, influenced performance on parallel untrained tasks (i.e., off-task outcomes).
The majority, 84% of participants, completed 20 sessions, with maximum outcome occurring with at least 10 sessions of training for some tasks and up to 20 sessions of training for others. Comparison of baseline to posttest performance revealed statistically significant improvements for 4 of 7 off-task outcome measures for the compliant group, with at least small (0.2 < d < 0.3) Cohen's d effect sizes for 3 of the 4. There were no statistically significant improvements observed for the noncompliant group.
The high level of compliance in the present study may be attributable to use of systematized verbal and written instructions with telephone follow-up. Compliance, as expected, appears important for optimizing the outcomes of auditory training. Methods to improve compliance in clinical populations need to be developed, and compliance data are important to report in future studies of auditory training.
研究依从性在使用助听器的退伍军人通过听力与沟通增强(LACE)程序进行的计算机化听觉训练结果中的作用。
作者检查了50名参与一项更大规模随机对照试验(旨在检验LACE训练效果)的助听器使用者的LACE训练数据,这些数据涉及5项任务(即嘈杂环境下的言语、时间压缩、竞争说话者、听觉记忆、漏词)。目标是确定:(a)在20次训练课程中,已训练任务(即任务内结果)的表现是否有变化;(b)依从性(定义为完成所有20次课程)与不依从性(定义为完成少于20次课程)是否会影响平行未训练任务的表现(即任务外结果)。
大多数(84%)参与者完成了20次课程,部分任务至少进行10次训练、其他任务进行多达20次训练时出现最大结果。基线与测试后表现的比较显示,依从组的7项任务外结果测量中有4项在统计学上有显著改善,其中4项中有3项的科恩d效应大小至少为小效应(0.2 < d < 0.3)。未依从组未观察到统计学上的显著改善。
本研究中的高依从性可能归因于使用了系统化的口头和书面指导以及电话随访。正如预期的那样,依从性对于优化听觉训练结果似乎很重要。需要开发提高临床人群依从性的方法,并且在未来的听觉训练研究中报告依从性数据很重要。