NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 May 10;8(5):e62836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062836. Print 2013.
Auditory training involves active listening to auditory stimuli and aims to improve performance in auditory tasks. As such, auditory training is a potential intervention for the management of people with hearing loss.
This systematic review (PROSPERO 2011: CRD42011001406) evaluated the published evidence-base for the efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training to improve speech intelligibility, cognition and communication abilities in adults with hearing loss, with or without hearing aids or cochlear implants.
A systematic search of eight databases and key journals identified 229 articles published since 1996, 13 of which met the inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted and reviewed by the two authors. Study quality was assessed using ten pre-defined scientific and intervention-specific measures.
Auditory training resulted in improved performance for trained tasks in 9/10 articles that reported on-task outcomes. Although significant generalisation of learning was shown to untrained measures of speech intelligibility (11/13 articles), cognition (1/1 articles) and self-reported hearing abilities (1/2 articles), improvements were small and not robust. Where reported, compliance with computer-based auditory training was high, and retention of learning was shown at post-training follow-ups. Published evidence was of very-low to moderate study quality.
Our findings demonstrate that published evidence for the efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for adults with hearing loss is not robust and therefore cannot be reliably used to guide intervention at this time. We identify a need for high-quality evidence to further examine the efficacy of computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss.
听觉训练包括主动聆听听觉刺激,旨在提高听觉任务的表现。因此,听觉训练是管理听力损失人群的一种潜在干预措施。
本系统评价(PROSPERO 2011:CRD42011001406)评估了个体基于计算机的听觉训练在改善听力损失成年人言语可懂度、认知和沟通能力方面的已发表证据基础,无论是否使用助听器或人工耳蜗。
系统搜索了八个数据库和主要期刊,确定了自 1996 年以来发表的 229 篇文章,其中 13 篇符合纳入标准。数据由两位作者独立提取和审查。使用十个预先定义的科学和干预特定措施评估研究质量。
在报告任务相关结果的 10 篇文章中有 9 篇表明听觉训练导致训练任务的表现得到改善。尽管在未训练的言语可懂度(11/13 篇文章)、认知(1/1 篇文章)和自我报告听力能力(1/2 篇文章)方面显示出显著的学习泛化,但改善很小且不稳健。在报告的情况下,基于计算机的听觉训练的依从性很高,并且在培训后的随访中显示出学习的保留。发表的证据质量非常低至中等。
我们的研究结果表明,关于个体基于计算机的听觉训练对听力损失成年人疗效的已发表证据并不稳健,因此目前不能可靠地用于指导干预。我们确定需要高质量的证据来进一步研究计算机听觉训练对听力损失人群的疗效。