Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Korea, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang, 410-769, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3188-9. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Perforations are major complications of endoscopic gastric resection, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and are generally detected on chest radiography following ESD. We hypothesized that a small amount of free air, defined as "intraperitoneal air," would not be noted on chest radiography. In this study we aimed to determine how often intraperitoneal air is seen on a computed tomography (CT) scan after ESD and to evaluate the association between clinical factors and intraperitoneal air.
A total of 147 patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasms were analyzed between September 2009 and September 2010. Patients underwent both chest radiography and noncontrast CT scans. Intraperitoneal air on the CT scan was stratified by the amount of gas as follows: grade I, free air localized along the outside of the gastric wall; grade II, free air in the lesser sac; and grade III, free air in front of the liver.
Intraperitoneal air was detected in 56 patients (38.1 %) by an abdominal CT scan, whereas free air was noted in 2 patients (1.4 %) by chest radiography. Most patients with intraperitoneal air (96.4 %, 54/56) were grade I or II and 3.6 % (2/56) were grade III. Abdominal pain was more frequent in the intraperitoneal air group (32.1 %, 18/56) than in the no intraperitoneal air group (17.6 %, 16/91; P = 0.042). Tumor location at the lesser curvature was more frequent in the intraperitoneal air group (66.1 %, 37/56) than in the no intraperitoneal air group (38.5 %, 35/91; P < 0.001). Fever, use of antibiotics, duration of hospital stay, C-reactive protein level, white blood cell count, complete resection, and local recurrence did not differ between the two groups. All patients who had intraperitoneal air recovered completely with medical treatment.
Intraperitoneal air after gastric ESD occurred unexpectedly frequently. However, a small amount of intraperitoneal air on a CT scan does not cause clinically significant complications.
内镜胃切除术(包括内镜黏膜下剥离术[ESD])后穿孔是一种主要并发症,通常在 ESD 后通过胸部 X 线摄影发现。我们假设,胸部 X 线摄影不会发现少量游离气体(定义为“腹腔气”)。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定 ESD 后 CT 扫描中腹腔气的出现频率,并评估临床因素与腹腔气之间的关系。
2009 年 9 月至 2010 年 9 月,对 147 例因胃肿瘤而行 ESD 的患者进行了分析。所有患者均行胸部 X 线摄影和非增强 CT 扫描。CT 扫描时,根据气体量将腹腔气分为以下三级:I 级,游离气体局限于胃壁外侧;II 级,游离气体位于小网膜囊内;III 级,游离气体位于肝前。
56 例(38.1%)患者通过腹部 CT 扫描发现腹腔气,而通过胸部 X 线摄影发现 2 例(1.4%)游离气。大多数腹腔气患者(96.4%,54/56)为 I 级或 II 级,3.6%(2/56)为 III 级。腹腔气组(32.1%,18/56)腹痛发生率高于无腹腔气组(17.6%,16/91;P=0.042)。腹腔气组肿瘤位于胃小弯的比例(66.1%,37/56)高于无腹腔气组(38.5%,35/91;P<0.001)。两组间发热、使用抗生素、住院时间、C 反应蛋白水平、白细胞计数、完全切除率和局部复发率无差异。所有有腹腔气的患者均经内科治疗完全康复。
ESD 后腹腔气的发生频率出乎意料地高。然而,CT 扫描中少量腹腔气不会引起有临床意义的并发症。