Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Sep;32(9):1624-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1300.
The Affordable Care Act increases US investment in Medicaid and community health centers, yet many people believe that care in such safety-net programs is substandard. Using data from more than 31,000 visits to primary care physicians in the period 2006-10, we examined whether the length or content of a visit was different for safety-net patients-those insured by Medicaid, those who are uninsured, and those seen in a community health center-compared to patients with private insurance. We found no significant differences in the average length of a primary care visit or in the likelihood of a patient's receiving preventive health counseling. Medicaid patients received more diagnostic and treatment services, and uninsured patients received fewer services, compared to privately insured patients, but the differences were small. This analysis indicates that length and content of primary care visits are comparable for safety-net and other patients. The main factors that contribute to differences in visit length and content are patients' health needs and the type of visit involved.
平价医疗法案增加了美国在医疗补助和社区卫生中心方面的投资,但许多人认为这些安全网项目中的医疗服务质量较差。我们利用了 2006 年至 2010 年间 31000 多次初级保健医生就诊的数据,考察了安全网患者(即医疗补助保险患者、无保险患者和在社区卫生中心就诊的患者)与私人保险患者相比,就诊的时间长短或内容是否有所不同。我们发现,初级保健就诊的平均时间或患者接受预防保健咨询的可能性没有显著差异。与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助保险患者接受了更多的诊断和治疗服务,而无保险患者接受的服务较少,但差异很小。这项分析表明,安全网患者和其他患者的初级保健就诊时间和内容相当。导致就诊时间和内容差异的主要因素是患者的健康需求和就诊类型。