Oh Hyun Jin, Cho Mun Sung, Lee Jae Wook, Jang Pil-Sang, Chung Nack-Gyun, Cho Bin, Kim Hack-Ki
Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Pediatr. 2013 Aug;56(8):343-50. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2013.56.8.343. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
Despite the established role of imatinib (IM) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in adults, there are few reports on its efficacy in children. In this study, we compared the outcomes of children with CML before and after the advent of IM-based treatment.
The study cohort consisted of 52 patients treated for CML at the Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea from January 1995 to October 2010. Patients were divided and analyzed according to the preImatinib group (pre-IMG) and imatinib group (IMG).
Median age at diagnosis for the overall cohort (pre-IMG, n=27; IMG, n=25) was 9 years, with a median follow-up duration of survivors of 84 months. Except for 5 patients in the IMG, all were diagnosed in chronic phase (CP). The overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed in CP was 45.7% and 89.7% for pre-IMG and IMG, respectively (P=0.025). The OS of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients in the 2 groups was similar, but the OS of patients diagnosed in CP who did not receive HSCT was superior in IMG (91.7% vs. 16.7%, P=0.014). Of the 12 patients in IMG who remained on IM without HSCT, 2 showed disease progression, compared to 11 of 12 in pre-IMG. No difference was observed in the progression free survival (PFS) of matched donor HSCT recipients and IM-based treatment recipients.
Similar PFS of patients treated with IM and those who received matched donor HSCT underscore the potential of IM as effective first-line treatment in childhood CML.
尽管伊马替尼(IM)在成人慢性髓性白血病(CML)治疗中的作用已得到确立,但关于其在儿童中的疗效报道较少。在本研究中,我们比较了基于伊马替尼治疗时代前后儿童CML患者的治疗结果。
研究队列包括1995年1月至2010年10月在韩国天主教大学儿科接受CML治疗的52例患者。根据伊马替尼治疗前组(pre-IMG)和伊马替尼组(IMG)对患者进行分组和分析。
整个队列(pre-IMG,n = 27;IMG,n = 25)诊断时的中位年龄为9岁,存活者的中位随访时间为84个月。除IMG组的5例患者外,所有患者均诊断为慢性期(CP)。CP期诊断患者的总生存率(OS)在pre-IMG组和IMG组分别为45.7%和89.7%(P = 0.025)。两组造血干细胞移植(HSCT)受者的OS相似,但未接受HSCT的CP期诊断患者的OS在IMG组更高(91.7%对16.7%,P = 0.014)。在IMG组未接受HSCT而继续使用IM治疗的12例患者中,2例出现疾病进展,而pre-IMG组的12例中有11例出现进展。匹配供体HSCT受者和基于IM治疗受者的无进展生存期(PFS)无差异。
接受IM治疗的患者与接受匹配供体HSCT的患者相似的PFS强调了IM作为儿童CML有效一线治疗的潜力。