• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去甲肾上腺素与多巴胺治疗感染性休克的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析

[Effectiveness of norepinephrine versus dopamine for septic shock: a meta analysis].

作者信息

Zhou Fei-hu, Song Qing

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China. Corresponding author: Song Qing, Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Aug;25(8):449-54.

PMID:24021037
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the effect of norepinephrine and dopamine on patients with septic shock.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about treatment of adults with septic shock with norepinephrine and dopamine were selected from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CBM and CNKI databases. Meta analysis concerning the effect of norepinephrine and dopamine on hemodynamics and metabolism of patients with septic shock was conducted by using Review Manager 5.0 software. The results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

Eleven trials with 1718 cases were enrolled. Meta analysis showed that compared with dopamine, norepinephrine could decrease the mortality (RR=0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.98, P=0.02). There were a decreased heart rate (SMD=-2.23, 95%CI -3.76 to -0.71, P=0.004), cardiac index (SMD=-0.71, 95%CI -1.07 to -0.35, P=0.0001) and an increased systemic vascular resistance index (SMD=1.39, 95%CI 0.54-2.23, P=0.001) were found in norepinephrine group compared with dopamine group. However, there were no significant differences on the effect of mean artery pressure (SMD=0.64, 95%CI -1.09-2.38, P=0.47), oxygen delivery (SMD=-0.54, 95%CI -1.50-0.42, P=0.27), oxygen consumption(SMD=-0.49, 95%CI -1.37-0.39, P=0.27) and lactic acid (SMD=-0.24, 95%CI -0.90-0.42, P=0.48) between these two vasopressors.

CONCLUSIONS

Norepinephrine is associated with an improved hemodynamics and decreased mortality compared with dopamine in septic shock patients.

摘要

目的

系统评价去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺对感染性休克患者的影响。

方法

从PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和中国知网(CNKI)数据库中筛选关于去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺治疗成人感染性休克的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用RevMan 5.0软件对去甲肾上腺素和多巴胺对感染性休克患者血流动力学和代谢的影响进行Meta分析。结果以二分类结局的风险比(RR)或连续数据的标准化均数差(SMD)表示,并给出95%置信区间(95%CI)。

结果

纳入11项试验,共1718例患者。Meta分析显示,与多巴胺相比,去甲肾上腺素可降低死亡率(RR=0.89,95%CI 0.81-0.98,P=0.02)。与多巴胺组相比,去甲肾上腺素组心率降低(SMD=-2.23,95%CI -3.76至-0.71,P=0.004)、心脏指数降低(SMD=-0.71,95%CI -1.07至-0.35,P=0.0001),全身血管阻力指数升高(SMD=1.39,95%CI 0.54-2.23,P=0.001)。然而,在平均动脉压(SMD=0.64,95%CI -1.09-2.38,P=0.47)、氧输送(SMD=-0.54,95%CI -1.50-0.42,P=0.27)、氧消耗(SMD=-0.49,95%CI -1.37-0.39,P=0.27)和乳酸(SMD=-0.24,95%CI -0.90-0.42,P=0.48)方面,这两种血管活性药物之间无显著差异。

结论

在感染性休克患者中,与多巴胺相比,去甲肾上腺素可改善血流动力学并降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
[Effectiveness of norepinephrine versus dopamine for septic shock: a meta analysis].去甲肾上腺素与多巴胺治疗感染性休克的疗效比较:一项荟萃分析
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Aug;25(8):449-54.
2
Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis.比较去甲肾上腺素与血管加压素治疗脓毒性休克患者的临床试验:一项荟萃分析。
Mil Med Res. 2014 May 1;1:6. doi: 10.1186/2054-9369-1-6. eCollection 2014.
3
Norepinephrine or dopamine for septic shock: systematic review of randomized clinical trials.去甲肾上腺素或多巴胺治疗脓毒性休克:随机临床试验的系统评价。
J Intensive Care Med. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):172-8. doi: 10.1177/0885066610396312. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
4
[Effects of β-blockers in patients with septic shock: a meta analysis].β受体阻滞剂对感染性休克患者的影响:一项荟萃分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Feb 23;96(7):570-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.07.017.
5
[Effect of dopamine and norepinephrine on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation of patients with septic shock].[多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克患者血流动力学及组织氧合的影响]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Jan;20(1):18-22.
6
[The clinical application and value of intra-aortic balloon pump in patients with septic shock].主动脉内球囊反搏在感染性休克患者中的临床应用及价值
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):46-9.
7
Effect of dopamine vs norepinephrine on hemodynamics in septic shock. Emphasis on right ventricular performance.多巴胺与去甲肾上腺素对感染性休克血流动力学的影响。重点关注右心室功能。
Chest. 1989 Jun;95(6):1282-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.6.1282.
8
Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: which is best?多巴胺、去甲肾上腺素和肾上腺素对脓毒性休克内脏循环的影响:哪种最佳?
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1659-67. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000063045.77339.B6.
9
The efficacy of dopamine versus epinephrine for pediatric or neonatal septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.多巴胺与肾上腺素治疗儿童或新生儿感染性休克的疗效比较:随机对照研究的荟萃分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Jan 14;46(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0768-x.
10
[A clinical study of pituitrin versus norepinephrine in the treatment of patients with septic shock].垂体后叶素与去甲肾上腺素治疗感染性休克患者的临床研究
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2012 Jan;24(1):33-7.