Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血小板治疗:经济方面的考虑。

Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: economic considerations.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Nov;31(11):959-70. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0088-8.

Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most common medical procedures performed for treatment of coronary artery disease. Antiplatelet medications as adjunctive therapy for PCI are used routinely, with indications for specific agents or their combinations varying depending on the clinical scenario. While the cost-effectiveness of well-established agents has been extensively studied, newer drugs have not been evaluated as thoroughly. In addition, the clinical application of some antiplatelet drugs has recently changed, thus making older studies of cost effectiveness less applicable to the current landscape of clinical practice. This article reviews cost-effectiveness considerations of antiplatelet therapies in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing PCI. Aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors including clopidogrel and the newer agents prasugrel and ticagrelor, as well as glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are discussed. Overall, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients undergoing PCI improves ischaemic outcomes and appears to be cost effective. The few available studies suggest that the recently approved medications prasugrel and ticagrelor are cost-effective alternatives to clopidogrel. However, no direct comparison between these two newer agents is available. The indications for GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have changed in the current PCI era, and there is a paucity of cost-effectiveness data for their use in contemporary care.

摘要

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是治疗冠状动脉疾病最常见的医疗程序之一。抗血小板药物作为 PCI 的辅助治疗常规使用,具体药物或其组合的适应证因临床情况而异。虽然已广泛研究了确立的抗血小板药物的成本效益,但尚未对新药进行如此全面的评估。此外,一些抗血小板药物的临床应用最近发生了变化,因此, older studies of cost effectiveness 对当前临床实践的现状适用性较低。本文综述了在接受 PCI 的冠状动脉疾病患者中抗血小板治疗的成本效益考虑因素。讨论了阿司匹林、包括氯吡格雷在内的 P2Y12 抑制剂以及较新的普拉格雷和替格瑞洛、以及糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa 抑制剂。总体而言,在接受 PCI 的患者中使用阿司匹林和 P2Y12 抑制剂的双联抗血小板治疗可改善缺血性结局,并且似乎具有成本效益。为数不多的可用研究表明,最近批准的药物普拉格雷和替格瑞洛是氯吡格雷的具有成本效益的替代品。然而,这两种较新药物之间没有直接比较。在当前的 PCI 时代,GP IIb/IIIa 抑制剂的适应证发生了变化,并且缺乏其在当代治疗中的成本效益数据。

相似文献

7
Triple antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes.急性冠脉综合征的三联抗血小板治疗。
Drugs. 2011 Sep 10;71(13):1703-19. doi: 10.2165/11594100-000000000-00000.
10
Updates in antiplatelet agents used in cardiovascular diseases.心血管疾病中抗血小板药物的进展
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;18(6):514-24. doi: 10.1177/1074248413499971.

引用本文的文献

7
Building the Case for Clopidogrel as a World Health Organization Essential Medicine.确立氯吡格雷作为世界卫生组织基本药物的理由
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jul;8(4):447-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001866. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

3
Comparative effectiveness of revascularization strategies.血运重建策略的比较效果。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 19;366(16):1467-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110717. Epub 2012 Mar 27.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验