Suppr超能文献

有症状腹股沟疝非手术治疗(观察等待)的随机对照试验的长期结果。

Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial of a nonoperative strategy (watchful waiting) for men with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.

机构信息

*Department of Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE †Hines VA Hospital, Cooperative Study Program Coordinator Center, Hines, IL.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):508-15. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a19725.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term crossover (CO) rate in men undergoing watchful waiting (WW) as a primary treatment strategy for their asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias.

BACKGROUND

With an average follow-up of 3.2 years, a randomized controlled trial comparing WW with routine repair for male patients with minimally symptomatic inguinal hernias led investigators to conclude that WW was an acceptable option [JAMA. 2006;295(3):285-292]. We now analyze patients in the WW group after an additional 7 years of follow-up.

METHODS

At the conclusion of the original study, 254 men who had been assigned to WW consented to longer-term follow-up. These patients were contacted yearly by mail questionnaire. Nonresponders were contacted by phone or e-mail for additional data collection.

RESULTS

Eighty-one of the 254 men (31.9%) crossed over to surgical repair before the end of the original study, December 31, 2004, with a median follow-up of 3.2 (range: 2-4.5) years. The patients have now been followed for an additional 7 years with a maximum follow-up of 11.5 years. The estimated cumulative CO rates using Kaplan-Meier analysis was 68%. Men older than 65 years crossed over at a considerably higher rate than younger men (79% vs 62%). The most common reason for CO was pain (54.1%). A total of 3 patients have required an emergency operation, but there has been no mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Men who present to their physicians because of an inguinal hernia even when minimally symptomatic should be counseled that although WW is a reasonable and safe strategy, symptoms will likely progress and an operation will be needed eventually.

摘要

目的

评估接受观察等待(WW)作为其无症状或症状轻微的腹股沟疝的主要治疗策略的男性的长期交叉(CO)率。

背景

一项比较 WW 与常规修复对症状轻微的男性腹股沟疝患者的随机对照试验,平均随访 3.2 年后,研究人员得出结论,WW 是一种可接受的选择[JAMA。2006;295(3):285-292]。我们现在对 WW 组的患者在额外 7 年的随访后进行分析。

方法

在原始研究结束时,254 名被分配到 WW 的男性同意进行长期随访。这些患者每年通过邮件问卷调查进行联系。未回复的患者通过电话或电子邮件联系以获取额外的数据。

结果

在原始研究结束前,即 2004 年 12 月 31 日,254 名男性中有 81 名(31.9%)交叉到手术修复,中位随访时间为 3.2(范围:2-4.5)年。现在,这些患者已经额外随访了 7 年,最长随访时间为 11.5 年。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计的累积 CO 率为 68%。年龄大于 65 岁的男性交叉的比例明显高于年轻男性(79%比 62%)。CO 的最常见原因是疼痛(54.1%)。共有 3 名患者需要紧急手术,但没有死亡。

结论

即使症状轻微,因腹股沟疝就诊的男性应被告知,尽管 WW 是一种合理且安全的策略,但症状可能会进展,最终需要手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验