Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, 1E, Kent Ridge Road, NUHS Tower Block, Level 8, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1909-1914. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03118-5. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
Individual studies on men with mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia who have opted for watchful waiting (WW) vary considerably. Furthermore, long-term data on such patients who cross over to herniorrhaphy is scarce.
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched systematically from inception to 3rd April 2024 for long-term follow-up of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on men with mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Individual participant survival data of cross over rates from WW to herniorrhaphy were extracted, reconstructed and combined. Secondary outcome was reason for cross over to herniorrhaphy.
Long-term follow-up of three RCTs with 592 participants was included. A total of 344/592 participants crossed over to herniorrhaphy during a median follow up period that ranged from 3.2 to 12.0 years. The median cumulative cross over rate was 54.2% (95% CI 45.5% - 66.3%). The cumulative 1-year, 5-year, and 10- year cross over rates were 28.7% (95% CI 25.2% - 32.5%), 51.5% (95% CI 47.4% - 55.6%), and 70.6% (95% CI 66.2% - 74.9%) respectively. During follow-up, the most frequent reasons for cross over to herniorrhaphy were increased pain 198/344 (57.6%) and incarceration 15/344 (4.4%).
This study provides valuable long-term data for patient counselling, indicating that while WW is a safe strategy for men with mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic inguinal hernia, symptoms would likely progress eventually, necessitating operative repair.
对于选择观察等待(WW)的轻度症状或无症状腹股沟疝男性患者,个别研究差异很大。此外,关于此类患者交叉到疝修补术的长期数据很少。
系统检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,从建库到 2024 年 4 月 3 日,以获取关于轻度症状或无症状腹股沟疝男性患者的随机对照试验(RCT)的长期随访数据。提取、重建和合并了 WW 交叉到疝修补术的个体参与者生存数据。次要结局是交叉到疝修补术的原因。
纳入了三项 RCT 的长期随访,共 592 名参与者。在中位随访时间 3.2 至 12.0 年期间,共有 344/592 名参与者交叉到疝修补术。中位累积交叉率为 54.2%(95%CI 45.5% - 66.3%)。累积 1 年、5 年和 10 年的交叉率分别为 28.7%(95%CI 25.2% - 32.5%)、51.5%(95%CI 47.4% - 55.6%)和 70.6%(95%CI 66.2% - 74.9%)。在随访期间,交叉到疝修补术的最常见原因是疼痛加重 198/344(57.6%)和嵌顿 15/344(4.4%)。
本研究为患者咨询提供了有价值的长期数据,表明 WW 是轻度症状或无症状腹股沟疝男性患者的安全策略,但症状可能最终会进展,需要手术修复。