Carreño O, Sendra L, Montalvá E, Miguel A, Orbis F, Herrero M J, Noguera I, Aliño S F, Lopez-Andujar R
Unidad de Cirugía Hepatobiliopancreatica y Trasplante, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Eur Surg Res. 2013;51(1-2):47-57. doi: 10.1159/000351339. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Several studies report results that suggest the need of vascularization blocking for efficient gene transfer to the liver, especially in nonviral gene therapy. In this study, we describe a surgical strategy for in vivo isolation of the pig liver, resulting in a vascular watertight organ that allows the evaluation of several gene injection conditions. The hepatic artery and portal, suprahepatic and infrahepatic cava veins were dissected. Then, liver vascularization was excluded for 5-7 min. In that time, we first injected 200 ml saline solution containing the p3c-eGFP plasmid (20 µg/ml) simultaneously through two different catheters placed in the portal and cava veins, respectively. Vital constants were monitored during the surgery to assess the safety of the procedure. Basal systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 92.8/63.2 mm Hg and dropped to 40.7/31.3 mm Hg at the end of vascular exclusion; the mean basal heart rate was 58 bpm, reaching 95 bpm when the blood pressure was low. Oxygen saturation was maintained above 98% during the intervention, and no relevant changes were observed in the ECG tracing. Peak plasma AST (aspartate aminotransferase) and ALT (alanine aminotransferase) levels were observed after 24 h (151 and 57 IU, respectively). These values were higher, but not relevant, in 60 ml/s injection than in 20 ml/s injection. Efficiency of gene transfer was studied with simultaneous (cava and portal veins) injection of eGFP gene at flow rates of 20 and 60 ml/s. Liver tissue samples were collected 24 h after injection and qPCR was carried out on each lobe sample. The results confirmed the efficiency of the procedure. Gene delivery differed between 20 ml/s (9.9-31.0 eGFP DNA copies/100 pg of total DNA) and 60 ml/s injections (0.6-1.1 eGFP DNA copies/100 pg of total DNA). Gene transcription showed no significant differences between 20 ml/s (15,701.8-21,475.8 eGFP RNA copies/100 ng of total RNA) and 60 ml/s (12,014-36,371 eGFP RNA copies/100 ng of total RNA). The procedure is not harmful for animals and it offers a wide range of gene delivery options because it allows different perfusion ways (anterograde and retrograde) and different flow rates to determine the optimal conditions of gene transfer. This strategy permits the use of cell therapy and viral or non-viral liver gene therapy, especially appropriated to a wide variety of inherited or acquired diseases because of the liver's ability to produce and deliver proteins to the bloodstream.
多项研究报告的结果表明,为了实现高效的基因转移至肝脏,尤其是在非病毒基因治疗中,需要进行血管阻断。在本研究中,我们描述了一种用于在体内分离猪肝的手术策略,从而得到一个血管密封的器官,这使得我们能够评估多种基因注射条件。解剖肝动脉、门静脉、肝上下腔静脉和肝下腔静脉。然后,排除肝脏血管化5 - 7分钟。在此期间,我们首先通过分别置于门静脉和腔静脉的两根不同导管同时注射200毫升含p3c - eGFP质粒(20微克/毫升)的盐溶液。手术过程中监测生命体征常数以评估该操作的安全性。基础收缩压/舒张压为92.8/63.2毫米汞柱,在血管排除结束时降至40.7/31.3毫米汞柱;平均基础心率为58次/分钟,在血压较低时达到95次/分钟。干预期间氧饱和度维持在98%以上,心电图追踪未观察到相关变化。血浆谷草转氨酶(AST)和谷丙转氨酶(ALT)峰值水平在24小时后出现(分别为151和57国际单位)。这些值在60毫升/秒注射时比20毫升/秒注射时更高,但无显著差异。通过以20和60毫升/秒的流速同时(经腔静脉和门静脉)注射eGFP基因来研究基因转移效率。注射后24小时收集肝组织样本,并对每个叶样本进行定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)。结果证实了该操作的有效性。20毫升/秒注射(9.9 - 31.0个eGFP DNA拷贝/100皮克总DNA)和60毫升/秒注射(0.6 - 1.1个eGFP DNA拷贝/100皮克总DNA)之间的基因递送情况不同。基因转录在20毫升/秒(15,701.8 - 21,475.8个eGFP RNA拷贝/100纳克总RNA)和60毫升/秒(12,014 - 36,371个eGFP RNA拷贝/100纳克总RNA)之间无显著差异。该操作对动物无害,并且由于它允许不同的灌注方式(顺行和逆行)以及不同的流速来确定基因转移的最佳条件,所以提供了广泛的基因递送选择。这种策略允许使用细胞治疗以及病毒或非病毒肝脏基因治疗,尤其适用于多种遗传性或获得性疾病,因为肝脏具有向血液中产生和输送蛋白质的能力。