Qian Jiehui, Petrov Yury
Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
J Vis. 2013 Sep 10;13(11):7. doi: 10.1167/13.11.7.
Size constancy is a well-known example of perceptual stabilization accounting for the effect of viewing distance on retinal image size. In a recent study (Qian & Petrov, 2012), we demonstrated a similar stabilization mechanism for contrast perception and suggested that the brain accounts for effects of perceived distance on various other object features in a similar way, a hypothesis that we called General Object Constancy. Here we report a new illusion of depth further supporting this hypothesis. Pairs of disks moved across the screen in a pattern of radial optic flow. A pair comprised a small black disk floating in front of a large white disk, creating the percept of a pencil tip viewed head on. As these "pencils" moved away, they appeared to grow in contrast, in diameter, and also appeared to be getting "sharper." The contrast and size illusions replicated our previous findings, while the depth gradient (sharpness) illusion revealed a depth constancy phenomenon. We discovered that depth and size constancies were related, e.g., the two illusions were strongly correlated across observers. Whereas the illusory diameter increase could not be canceled by any degree of depth modulation, decreasing the diameter of the "pencils" during optic flow motion (thus increasing their disparity gradient) weakened the illusory depth gradient increase. This paradoxical result, as well as our other results, is explained by the General Object Constancy model: Besides using the same scaling factor to account for size, contrast, and depth variations with distance, the brain uses the apparent object size to additionally scale contrast and depth signals.
大小恒常性是感知稳定化的一个著名例子,它解释了观察距离对视网膜图像大小的影响。在最近的一项研究(钱&彼得罗夫,2012年)中,我们证明了对比度感知中存在类似的稳定机制,并提出大脑以类似的方式解释感知距离对各种其他物体特征的影响,我们将这一假设称为通用物体恒常性。在此,我们报告一种新的深度错觉,进一步支持这一假设。成对的圆盘以径向光流模式在屏幕上移动。一对圆盘包括一个小的黑色圆盘漂浮在一个大的白色圆盘前面,产生一种从正面看铅笔尖的感知。当这些“铅笔”移开时,它们在对比度、直径上似乎变大了,并且看起来也变得“更尖”了。对比度和大小错觉重复了我们之前的发现,而深度梯度(锐度)错觉揭示了一种深度恒常性现象。我们发现深度和大小恒常性是相关的,例如,这两种错觉在观察者之间高度相关。虽然虚幻的直径增加不能通过任何程度的深度调制来消除,但在光流运动期间减小“铅笔”的直径(从而增加它们的视差梯度)会减弱虚幻的深度梯度增加。这个矛盾的结果以及我们的其他结果,都由通用物体恒常性模型来解释:除了使用相同的缩放因子来解释大小、对比度和深度随距离的变化外,大脑还使用表观物体大小来额外缩放对比度和深度信号。