Cornelius Bert, van der Klink Jac J L, Brouwer Sandra, Groothoff Johan W
Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , The Netherlands .
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1161-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.833310. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
This study aimed to examine under-recognition, under-treatment and severity of under-treated DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders among disability claimants.
In a representative sample of Dutch disability claimants (n = 346), registry codes certified according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) by insurance physicians, were compared with classifications according to the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) detected by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Levels of ICD-10/DSM-IV agreement were assessed for mood and anxiety disorders in the total sample, and prevalence of recent DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders in a pure ICD-10 somatic subgroup. Treatment and severity of under-treated DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders were assessed in two subgroups of disability claimants with either an ICD-10 somatic or mental disorder as primary cause of disability, irrespective of any ICD-10 comorbidity.
Levels of ICD-10/DSM-IV agreement were poor (κ: 0.237 for mood and 0.260 for anxiety disorders). In the pure ICD-10 somatic subgroup, the prevalence of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders was 3.8% and 11.4%, respectively. In the ICD-10 somatic subgroup irrespective of any ICD-10 comorbidity, 45.2% (major depressive disorder), 80.0% (social phobia) and 53.3% (general anxiety disorder) were under-treated. In the ICD-10 mental subgroup, these percentages were 44.7%, 80.9% and 33.4%, respectively. In both of these subgroups, under-treated DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders were predominantly serious in terms of impairment and disability.
Serious mental disorders were found to be substantially under-diagnosed and under-treated among disability claimants. To optimize diagnosis and treatment of disabling mental disorder, medical professionals in insurance, occupational and in the health care sector should closely collaborate. For claimants with under-treated mental disorders, tailor-made multidisciplinary interventions are needed to promote return to work and to prevent permanent disability.
本研究旨在调查残疾索赔人中未被充分识别、未得到充分治疗的DSM-IV情绪和焦虑障碍情况以及未充分治疗的严重程度。
在荷兰残疾索赔人的代表性样本(n = 346)中,将保险医生根据国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)认证的登记编码与综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)检测到的根据精神障碍诊断统计手册(DSM-IV)的分类进行比较。评估了总样本中情绪和焦虑障碍的ICD-10/DSM-IV一致性水平,以及纯ICD-10躯体亚组中近期DSM-IV情绪和焦虑障碍的患病率。在以ICD-10躯体或精神障碍为残疾主要原因的两个残疾索赔人亚组中,评估了未充分治疗的DSM-IV情绪和焦虑障碍的治疗情况及严重程度,不考虑任何ICD-10合并症。
ICD-10/DSM-IV一致性水平较差(情绪障碍的κ值为0.237,焦虑障碍的κ值为0.260)。在纯ICD-10躯体亚组中,DSM-IV情绪和焦虑障碍的患病率分别为3.8%和11.4%。在不考虑任何ICD-10合并症的ICD-10躯体亚组中,45.2%(重度抑郁症)、80.0%(社交恐惧症)和53.3%(广泛性焦虑障碍)未得到充分治疗。在ICD-10精神亚组中,这些百分比分别为44.7%、80.9%和33.4%。在这两个亚组中,未充分治疗的DSM-IV情绪和焦虑障碍在损害和残疾方面主要都很严重。
发现残疾索赔人中严重精神障碍的诊断和治疗严重不足。为了优化致残性精神障碍的诊断和治疗,保险、职业和医疗保健部门的医学专业人员应密切合作。对于未充分治疗精神障碍的索赔人,需要量身定制多学科干预措施,以促进重返工作岗位并防止永久性残疾。