Suppr超能文献

针刺治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Effectiveness of acupuncture for nonspecific chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Lam Megan, Galvin Rose, Curry Philip

机构信息

*Department of School of Social Work & Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland; and †School of Physiotherapy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Nov 15;38(24):2124-38. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000435025.65564.b7.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the totality of evidence in relation to the effectiveness of acupuncture for nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Acupuncture has become a popular alternative for treating clinical symptoms of NSCLBP. A number of RCTs have examined the effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of NSCLBP.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was completed without date or language restrictions up to May 2012. Studies included in the review were RCTs that examined all forms of acupuncture that adhered to the Traditional Acupuncture Theory for treating NSCLBP. Outcome measures included impairment, activity limitation, and participation restriction. The methodological quality of the studies was examined using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review, of which 25 studies presented relevant data for the meta-analysis. Acupuncture had a clinically meaningful reduction in levels of self-reported pain (mean difference =-16.76 [95% confidence interval, -33.33 to -0.19], P = 0.05, I = 90%) when compared with sham, and improved function (standard mean difference =-0.94 [95% confidence interval, -1.41 to -0.47], P < 0.00, I = 78%) when compared with no treatment immediately postintervention. Levels of function also clinically improved when acupuncture in addition to usual care, or electroacupuncture was compared with usual care alone. When acupuncture was compared with medications (NSAIDs, muscle relaxants, and analgesics) and usual care, there were statistically significant differences between the control and the intervention groups but these differences were too small to be of any clinical significance. There was no evidence in support of acupuncture over transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review demonstrates that acupuncture may have a favorable effect on self-reported pain and functional limitations on NSCLBP. However, the results should be interpreted in the context of the limitations identified, particularly in relation to the heterogeneity in the study characteristics and the low methodological quality in many of the included studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

目的

评估针刺治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛(NSCLBP)有效性的全部证据。

背景数据总结

针刺已成为治疗NSCLBP临床症状的一种流行替代方法。多项RCTs研究了针刺治疗NSCLBP的有效性。

方法

截至2012年5月,完成了一项无日期或语言限制的系统文献检索。纳入综述的研究为RCTs,其考察了所有遵循传统针刺理论治疗NSCLBP的针刺形式。结局指标包括损伤、活动受限和参与受限。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具检查研究的方法学质量。

结果

32项研究纳入系统评价,其中25项研究提供了荟萃分析的相关数据。与假针刺相比,针刺在自我报告的疼痛水平上有临床意义的降低(平均差=-16.76 [95%置信区间,-33.33至-0.19],P = 0.05,I² = 90%),与干预后立即不治疗相比,功能得到改善(标准化平均差=-0.94 [95%置信区间,-1.41至-0.47],P < 0.00,I² = 78%)。当针刺联合常规护理或电针与单纯常规护理相比时,功能水平在临床上也有所改善。当针刺与药物(非甾体抗炎药、肌肉松弛剂和镇痛药)及常规护理相比时,对照组与干预组之间存在统计学显著差异,但这些差异太小,无任何临床意义。没有证据支持针刺优于经皮电刺激神经疗法。

结论

该系统评价表明,针刺可能对NSCLBP的自我报告疼痛和功能受限有有利影响。然而,应在已确定的局限性背景下解释结果,特别是与研究特征的异质性以及许多纳入研究的低方法学质量有关。

证据水平

1级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验