• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证“先住后付”(Housing First)的忠实度调查。

Development and validation of a Housing First fidelity survey.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Sep 1;64(9):911-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200500.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201200500
PMID:24026835
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Programs that use the Housing First model are being implemented throughout the United States and internationally. The authors describe the development and validation of a Housing First fidelity survey.

METHODS

A 46-item survey was developed to measure fidelity across five domains: housing process and structure, separation of housing and services, service philosophy, service array, and team structure. The survey was administered to staff and clients of 93 supported-housing programs in California. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to identify the items and model structure that best fit the data.

RESULTS

Sixteen items were retained in a two-factor model, one related to approach to housing, separation of housing and services, and service philosophy and one related to service array and team structure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey mapped program practices by using a common metric that captured variation in fidelity to Housing First across a large-scale implementation of supported-housing programs.

摘要

目的

“住房优先”模式的项目正在美国和国际上实施。作者描述了住房优先保真度调查的开发和验证。

方法

开发了一个包含 46 个项目的调查,以衡量五个领域的保真度:住房过程和结构、住房和服务的分离、服务理念、服务范围和团队结构。该调查在加利福尼亚州的 93 个支持性住房项目的工作人员和客户中进行。采用探索性和验证性因素分析来确定最适合数据的项目和模型结构。

结果

16 个项目保留在一个两因素模型中,一个与住房、住房和服务的分离以及服务理念相关,另一个与服务范围和团队结构相关。

结论

我们的调查使用通用指标来映射项目实践,该指标通过对支持性住房项目的大规模实施中的住房优先保真度的变化进行了捕捉。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a Housing First fidelity survey.开发并验证“先住后付”(Housing First)的忠实度调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Sep 1;64(9):911-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200500.
2
Fidelity to the Housing First Model and Variation in Health Service Use Within Permanent Supportive Housing.对“住房优先”模式的忠诚度以及永久性支持性住房内医疗服务使用情况的差异
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Dec 1;66(12):1283-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400564. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
4
Fidelity to the housing first model and effectiveness of permanent supported housing programs in California.加利福尼亚州对“住房优先”模式的忠诚度及永久性支持性住房项目的有效性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Nov 1;65(11):1311-7. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300447. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
5
Permanent Supportive Housing for Transition-Age Youths: Service Costs and Fidelity to the Housing First Model.为过渡年龄青年提供的永久性支持性住房:服务成本与对“住房第一”模式的忠诚度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2016 Jun 1;67(6):615-21. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500200. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
6
Variation in the implementation of California's Full Service Partnerships for persons with serious mental illness.加利福尼亚州全面服务伙伴关系在严重精神疾病患者中的实施情况存在差异。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 2):2245-67. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12119. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
7
Development and testing of two implementation tools to measure components of professional pharmacy service fidelity.开发和测试两个实施工具,以衡量专业药学服务保真度的组成部分。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Jun;22(3):369-77. doi: 10.1111/jep.12496. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
The impact of failed housing policy on the public behavioral health system.失败的住房政策对公共行为健康系统的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Mar 1;65(3):313-4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300230.
9
The Housing First Model (HFM) fidelity index: designing and testing a tool for measuring integrity of housing programs that serve active substance users.住房优先模式(HFM)保真度指数:设计和测试一种工具,用于衡量为积极使用药物者提供住房项目的完整性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013 May 3;8:16. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-16.
10
Evaluating fidelity to the wraparound service model for youth: application of item response theory to the Wraparound Fidelity Index.评估青少年综合服务模式的保真度:项目反应理论在综合服务保真度指数中的应用。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):583-98. doi: 10.1037/a0031864. Epub 2013 Apr 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Homelessness Among US Veterans After Implementation of the Ending Veteran Homelessness Initiative.实施《终止退伍军人无家可归倡议》后美国退伍军人无家可归状况的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353778. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53778.
2
Stakeholder perspectives on sustainment of Housing First in a VA permanent supportive housing program.利益相关者对退伍军人事务部永久性支持性住房项目中住房优先制的可持续性的看法。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):374-384. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13904. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Characterizing components of and attendance at resident-driven Housing First programming in the context of community-based participatory research.
描述以社区为基础的参与式研究背景下,由住院医师主导的住房优先计划的组成部分和参与情况。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Jul;49(5):1376-1392. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22491. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Provider perspectives of housing programs for young adults experiencing homelessness.为无家可归的年轻人提供住房项目的提供者观点。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020 May;112. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104898. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
What Works? Toward a New Classification System for Mental Health Supported Accommodation Services: The Simple Taxonomy for Supported Accommodation (STAX-SA).有效的方法:为心理健康支持性住宿服务建立新的分类系统:支持性住宿的简易分类法(STAX-SA)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 24;15(2):190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020190.
6
Availability of comprehensive services in permanent supportive housing in Los Angeles.洛杉矶永久性支持性住房综合服务的可获得性。
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Mar;26(2):207-213. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12510. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Identifying variability in permanent supportive housing: A comparative effectiveness approach to measuring health outcomes.识别永久性支持性住房中的差异:一种衡量健康结果的比较有效性方法。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(4):414-424. doi: 10.1037/ort0000232. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
8
New directions for psychiatric rehabilitation in the USA.美国精神病康复的新方向。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Jun;26(3):223-227. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000834. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
The Dilemmas of Frontline Staff Working with the Homeless: Housing First, Discretion, and the Task Environment.一线工作人员与无家可归者合作面临的困境:优先提供住房、自由裁量权与任务环境
Hous Policy Debate. 2016;26(1):105-122. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2014.1003142. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
10
Implementation and Outcomes of Forensic Housing First Programs.法医优先住房项目的实施与成果
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Jan;52(1):46-55. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9946-5. Epub 2015 Oct 5.