Suppr超能文献

出院时的社会干预。医院科室、全科医疗与社会部门之间的合作

[Social intervention at discharge. Cooperation between a hospital department, general practice and the social sector].

作者信息

Hansen R

机构信息

Neuromedicinsk afdeling, Københavs Amts Sygehus i Gentofte.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2506-10.

PMID:2402834
Abstract

The object of this investigation is to illustrate the effect of intensive social assistance at and after discharge from hospital and, if possible, to present some practical proposals. The investigation was controlled: 100 patients domiciled in two communities in the catchment region of the hospital participated in the investigation. The patients were aged 25-75 years and they were discharged from a neuromedical inpatient department. These were subdivided at random into an intervention and a control group. The investigation comprises interviews with the patients, questionnaires to the general practitioners and the social and health authorities. Intervention was undertaken for five months in one of the groups in cooperation with the general practitioner. Although the intervention revealed that there were numerous unsolved problems and that patients with poor ability were left to themselves to a great extent, the intervention did not result in any measurable difference in patient satisfaction as compared with the control group. No readmissions occurred on account of social reasons in the intervention group. A series of planned forms of assistance did not function on discharge. The fact that patients are discharged earlier in the course of the condition than previously is considered to be the cause of a number of the unsolved problems. At the conclusion of the investigation, there were more numerous unsolved problems in the control group than in the intervention group and the need for advice and support, not only for the patients but also for the relatives, which was considerable after discharge, was documented. This need has not fulfilled and proposals are discussed.

摘要

本次调查的目的是阐明强化社会救助在患者出院时及出院后的效果,并在可能的情况下提出一些切实可行的建议。该调查采用了对照研究:100名居住在医院集水区内两个社区的患者参与了调查。这些患者年龄在25至75岁之间,均从神经医学住院部出院。他们被随机分为干预组和对照组。调查包括对患者的访谈、向全科医生以及社会和卫生当局发放问卷。其中一组与全科医生合作进行了为期五个月的干预。尽管干预显示存在许多未解决的问题,且能力较差的患者在很大程度上被放任不管,但与对照组相比,干预并未在患者满意度方面产生任何可衡量的差异。干预组未因社会原因再次入院。一系列计划好的救助形式在出院时并未发挥作用。患者在病情发展过程中比以前更早出院这一事实被认为是导致许多未解决问题的原因。在调查结束时,对照组中未解决的问题比干预组更多,而且记录显示,不仅患者,其亲属在出院后也非常需要建议和支持。这种需求尚未得到满足,相关建议也在讨论之中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验