• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[在一个新启动的护理项目中关于癌症患者的跨部门合作。基于对全科医生和肿瘤学家的焦点小组访谈得出的想法和主题]

[Cross-sectorial cooperation regarding cancer patients in a recently started care program. Ideas and themes based on focus group interviews with general practitioners and oncologists].

作者信息

Nielsen J D, Palshof T, Olesen F

机构信息

Aarhus Universitet, Forskningsenheden for Almen Medicin.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Apr 5;161(14):2074-8.

PMID:10354793
Abstract

This study identified ideas for an improved collaboration between general practitioners and oncologists regarding patients with cancer. A qualitative research-method with focused group interviews was chosen. The results demonstrated that both oncologists and general practitioners would like the general practitioners to take more active part in the total care programme for cancer patients. Some of the needed improvements were more detailed referral letters including description of treatment plans, information about what the patient had been told and general information about the specific cancer disease. Both parts desire bilateral information exchange and a dialogue about the distribution of tasks. Both parts are willing to collaborate but this is at present restricted due to lack of knowledge of each others' working areas and the oncologists' impression that general practitioners need more medical knowledge regarding specific aspects of cancer. A randomized intervention study using ideas from this study may clarify if it is possible to improve the collaboration and thereby the cancer patients' satisfaction with care.

摘要

本研究确定了改善全科医生与肿瘤学家在癌症患者治疗方面合作的思路。研究采用了聚焦小组访谈的定性研究方法。结果表明,肿瘤学家和全科医生都希望全科医生在癌症患者的整体护理计划中发挥更积极的作用。一些需要改进的方面包括更详细的转诊信,其中应包含治疗计划的描述、告知患者的信息以及特定癌症疾病的一般信息。双方都希望进行双向信息交流并就任务分配进行对话。双方都愿意合作,但目前由于对彼此工作领域缺乏了解,以及肿瘤学家认为全科医生在癌症特定方面需要更多医学知识,合作受到了限制。一项采用本研究思路的随机干预研究可能会阐明是否有可能改善合作,从而提高癌症患者对护理的满意度。

相似文献

1
[Cross-sectorial cooperation regarding cancer patients in a recently started care program. Ideas and themes based on focus group interviews with general practitioners and oncologists].[在一个新启动的护理项目中关于癌症患者的跨部门合作。基于对全科医生和肿瘤学家的焦点小组访谈得出的想法和主题]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Apr 5;161(14):2074-8.
2
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
3
"When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me"--the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer--a qualitative study.“癌症患者不再找我看病了”——全科医生在癌症患者早期随访中的作用——一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 21;7:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-19.
4
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
5
Complementary health practitioners' attitudes, practices and knowledge related to women's cancers.补充医疗从业者对女性癌症的态度、实践及知识
Cancer Prev Control. 1999 Feb;3(1):77-82.
6
Empowering the cancer patient or controlling the tumor? A qualitative study of how cancer patients experience consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and physicians, respectively.赋能癌症患者还是控制肿瘤?一项关于癌症患者如何分别体验与补充和替代医学从业者及医生会诊的定性研究。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2005 Jun;4(2):195-200. doi: 10.1177/1534735405276721.
7
Cross-sectorial cooperation and supportive care in general practice: cancer patients' experiences.全科医学中的跨部门合作和支持性护理:癌症患者的体验。
Fam Pract. 2011 Oct;28(5):532-40. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmr011. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
8
[Social medical cooperation after discharge from the hospital].[出院后的社会医疗合作]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Aug 27;152(35):2501-4.
9
Are older cancer patients being referred to oncologists? A mail questionnaire of Ontario primary care practitioners to evaluate their referral patterns.老年癌症患者会被转诊给肿瘤学家吗?安大略省初级保健从业者的一份邮寄调查问卷,用于评估他们的转诊模式。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4627-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.06.073.
10
[General practitioners' evaluation of the out-of-hours service in Copenhagen County].[哥本哈根郡全科医生对非工作时间服务的评估]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Sep 5;167(36):3412-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation in Cancer Care on Patients' Perceived Coordination: Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症护理中跨部门视频会诊对患者感知协调的挑战:随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 11;11:e60158. doi: 10.2196/60158.
2
Improving continuity by bringing the cancer patient, general practitioner and oncologist together in a shared video-based consultation - protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过在基于视频的共享咨询中将癌症患者、全科医生和肿瘤医生聚集在一起来提高连续性 - 一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 25;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0978-8.
3
Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital.
针对新转诊癌症患者的共享护理计划的随机对照试验:弥合全科医疗与医院之间的差距
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):263-72. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.263.