Suppr超能文献

确定用于预测丙型肝炎肝移植后早期肝硬化的快速纤维化的最佳指标。

Identifying the superior measure of rapid fibrosis for predicting premature cirrhosis after liver transplantation for hepatitis C.

作者信息

Howell J, Sawhney R, Angus P, Fink M, Jones R, Wang B Z, Visvanathan K, Crowley P, Gow P

机构信息

Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Transpl Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;15(6):588-99. doi: 10.1111/tid.12134. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence post liver transplant is universal, with a subgroup of patients developing rapid hepatic fibrosis. Various clinical definitions of rapid fibrosis (RF) have been used to identify risks for rapid progression, but their comparability and efficacy at predicting adverse outcomes has not been determined.

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis was conducted on 100 adult patients with HCV who underwent liver transplantation at a single center. We measured year 1 fibrosis progression (RF defined as METAVIR F score ≥ 1 at 1-year liver biopsy), time to METAVIR F2-stage fibrosis, and fibrosis rate (calculated using liver biopsies graded by METAVIR scoring F0-4; fibrosis rate = fibrosis stage/year post transplant). RF was defined as ≥ 0.5 units/year.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that donor age and peak HCV viral load were significant risks for RF, when fibrosis rate was used to define RF. Advanced donor age was a risk for rapid progression to F2-stage fibrosis, whereas genotype 2 or 3 HCV infection was protective. Fibrosis rate had the strongest correlation with time to cirrhosis development (P < 0.0001, r = -0.76) and was the most accurate predictor of rapid graft cirrhosis (P < 0.0001, area under the curve 0.979, sensitivity 100%, specificity 94%).

CONCLUSION

Different measures of RF progression identify different risks for RF and are not directly comparable. Fibrosis rate was the most accurate predictor of rapid graft cirrhosis.

摘要

背景

肝移植后丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)复发普遍存在,部分患者会出现快速肝纤维化。已采用多种快速纤维化(RF)的临床定义来识别快速进展的风险,但尚未确定它们在预测不良结局方面的可比性和有效性。

方法

对在单一中心接受肝移植的100例成年HCV患者进行回顾性数据分析。我们测量了第1年的纤维化进展情况(RF定义为肝移植后1年肝活检时METAVIR F评分≥1)、达到METAVIR F2期纤维化的时间以及纤维化速率(使用METAVIR评分F0 - 4分级的肝活检计算;纤维化速率 = 移植后纤维化阶段/年)。RF定义为≥0.5单位/年。

结果

多变量分析显示,当使用纤维化速率定义RF时,供体年龄和HCV病毒载量峰值是RF的显著风险因素。供体年龄较大是快速进展至F2期纤维化的风险因素,而HCV基因2型或3型感染具有保护作用。纤维化速率与肝硬化发生时间的相关性最强(P < 0.0001,r = -0.76),并且是快速移植肝硬化最准确的预测指标(P < 0.0001,曲线下面积0.979,敏感性100%,特异性94%)。

结论

RF进展的不同测量方法识别出RF的不同风险,且不可直接比较。纤维化速率是快速移植肝硬化最准确的预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验