School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
J Evol Biol. 2013 Oct;26(10):2244-59. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12224. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Floral nectar composition has been explained as an adaptation to factors that are either directly or indirectly related to pollinator attraction. However, it is often unclear whether the sugar composition is a direct adaptation to pollinator preferences. Firstly, the lower osmolality of sucrose solutions means that they evaporate more rapidly than hexose solutions, which might be one reason why sucrose-rich nectar is typically found in flowers with long tubes (adapted to long-tongued pollinators), where it is better protected from evaporation than in open or short-tubed flowers. Secondly, it can be assumed that temperature-dependent evaporation is generally lower during the night than during the day so that selection pressure to secrete nectar with high osmolality (i.e. hexose-rich solutions) is relaxed for night-active flowers pollinated at night. Thirdly, the breeding system may affect selection pressure on nectar traits; that is, for pollinator-independent, self-pollinated plants, a lower selective pressure on nectar traits can be assumed, leading to a higher variability of nectar sugar composition independent of pollinator preferences, nectar accessibility and nectar protection. To analyse the relations between flower tube length, day vs. night pollination and self-pollination, the nectar sugar composition was investigated in 78 European Caryophylloideae (Caryophyllaceae) with different pollination modes (diurnal, nocturnal, self-pollination) using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). All Caryophylleae species (Dianthus and relatives) were found to have nectar with more than 50% sucrose, whereas the sugar composition of Sileneae species (Silene and relatives) ranged from 0% to 98.2%. In the genus Silene, a clear dichotomous distribution of sucrose- and hexose-dominant nectars is evident. We found a positive correlation between the flower tube length and sucrose content in Caryophylloideae, particularly in day-flowering species, using both conventional analyses and phylogenetically independent contrasts.
花的花蜜组成被解释为对与传粉者吸引力直接或间接相关的因素的适应。然而,花蜜的糖组成是否是对传粉者偏好的直接适应往往并不清楚。首先,蔗糖溶液的较低渗透压意味着它们比己糖溶液蒸发得更快,这可能是花蜜中富含蔗糖的花朵通常具有长管(适应长舌传粉者)的原因之一,在那里它比在开口或短管花朵中蒸发得更好。其次,可以假设,与白天相比,夜间温度依赖性蒸发通常较低,因此,分泌具有高渗透压(即富含己糖的溶液)的花蜜的选择压力对于夜间活动的花朵在夜间传粉时会放松。第三,繁殖系统可能会影响对花蜜特征的选择压力;也就是说,对于与传粉者无关的自花授粉植物,可以假设对花蜜特征的选择压力较低,导致与传粉者偏好、花蜜可及性和花蜜保护无关的花蜜糖组成的更高变异性。为了分析花管长度、白天与夜间传粉和自花授粉之间的关系,使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)研究了具有不同传粉方式(白天、夜间、自花授粉)的 78 种欧洲石竹科(石竹科)植物的花蜜糖组成。所有石竹科物种(石竹和亲属)的花蜜中都发现含有超过 50%的蔗糖,而 Sileneae 物种(Silene 和亲属)的糖组成范围从 0%到 98.2%。在 Silene 属中,蔗糖和己糖为主的花蜜之间存在明显的二分分布。我们发现石竹科花管长度与蔗糖含量之间存在正相关,特别是在白天开花的物种中,同时使用常规分析和系统发育独立对比。