Health Law and Policy Institute, University of Houston Law Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Genet Med. 2013 Dec;15(12):915-20. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.135. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) for reporting incidental findings present novel ethical and legal issues. This article expresses no views on the ethical aspects of these recommendations and focuses strictly on liability risks and how to minimize them. The recommendations place labs and clinicians in a new liability environment that exposes them to intentional tort lawsuits as well to traditional suits for negligence. Intentional tort suits are especially troubling because of their potential to inflict ruinous personal financial losses on individual clinicians and laboratory personnel. This article surveys this new liability landscape and describes analytical approaches for minimizing tort liabilities. To a considerable degree, liability risks can be controlled by structuring activities in ways that make future lawsuits nonviable before the suits ever arise. Proactive liability analysis is an effective tool for minimizing tort liabilities in connection with the testing and reporting activities that the ACMG recommends.
美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院 (ACMG) 最近提出的报告偶发发现的建议带来了新的伦理和法律问题。本文对这些建议的伦理方面不发表任何意见,而仅严格关注责任风险及其最小化的方法。这些建议将实验室和临床医生置于一个新的责任环境中,使他们面临故意侵权诉讼以及传统的疏忽诉讼。故意侵权诉讼尤其令人困扰,因为它们有可能给个别临床医生和实验室人员造成毁灭性的个人财务损失。本文调查了这一新的责任领域,并描述了最小化侵权责任的分析方法。在相当程度上,可以通过以防止未来诉讼的方式来组织活动,从而控制责任风险,即使诉讼尚未出现也是如此。主动的责任分析是与 ACMG 建议的测试和报告活动相关的最小化侵权责任的有效工具。