Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 11;3(9):e003214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003214.
To explore general practice staff, pharmacist and patient experiences with pharmacist services in Australian general practice clinics within the Pharmacists in Practice Study.
Qualitative study.
Two general practice clinics in Melbourne, Australia, in which pharmacists provided medication reviews, patient and staff education, medicines information and quality assurance services over a 6-month period.
Patients, practice staff and pharmacists.
Semi-structured telephone interviews with patients, focus groups with practice staff and semi-structured interviews and periodic narrative reports with practice pharmacists. Data were analysed thematically and theoretical frameworks used to explain the findings.
34 participants were recruited: 18 patients, 14 practice staff (9 general practitioners, 4 practice nurses, 1 practice manager) and 2 practice pharmacists. Five main themes emerged: environment; professional relationships and integration; pharmacist attributes; staff and patient benefits and logistical challenges. Participants reported that colocation and the interdisciplinary environment of general practice enabled better communication and collaboration compared to traditional community and consultant pharmacy services. Participants felt that pharmacists needed to possess certain attributes to ensure successful integration, including being personable and proactive. Attitudinal, professional and logistical barriers were identified but were able to be overcome. The findings were explained using D'Amour's structuration model of collaboration and Roger's diffusion of innovation theory.
This is the first qualitative study to explore the experiences of general practice staff, pharmacists and patients on their interactions within the Australian general practice environment. Participants were receptive of colocated pharmacist services, and various barriers and facilitators to integration were identified. Future research should investigate the feasibility and sustainability of general practice pharmacist roles.
在“实践中的药剂师”研究中,探索澳大利亚普通诊所中普通科医生、药剂师和患者对药剂师服务的体验。
定性研究。
澳大利亚墨尔本的两家普通诊所,在 6 个月的时间里,药剂师提供药物审查、患者和员工教育、药物信息和质量保证服务。
患者、医务人员和药剂师。
对患者进行半结构化电话访谈,对医务人员进行焦点小组访谈,对医务人员进行半结构化访谈和定期叙述性报告。数据采用主题分析,并用理论框架解释研究结果。
共招募了 34 名参与者:18 名患者、14 名医务人员(9 名全科医生、4 名护士、1 名经理)和 2 名药剂师。出现了 5 个主要主题:环境;专业关系和整合;药剂师属性;员工和患者的利益以及后勤挑战。参与者报告说,与传统的社区和顾问药剂师服务相比,普通科医生的联合办公和跨学科环境促进了更好的沟通和协作。参与者认为,药剂师需要具备一定的属性才能确保成功整合,包括友好和积极主动。确定了态度、专业和后勤方面的障碍,但可以克服。研究结果用 D'Amour 的协作结构化模型和 Roger 的创新扩散理论来解释。
这是第一项探索澳大利亚普通诊所环境中普通科医生、药剂师和患者相互作用体验的定性研究。参与者对联合办公的药剂师服务持欢迎态度,并确定了整合的各种障碍和促进因素。未来的研究应调查普通科医生药剂师角色的可行性和可持续性。