Suppr超能文献

交叉配型血小板输注在低增生性血小板减少症患者中的应用:系统评价。

Utility of cross-matched platelet transfusions in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia: a systematic review.

机构信息

American Red Cross Blood Services, Penn-Jersey Region, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2014 Apr;54(4):1180-91. doi: 10.1111/trf.12395. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiply transfused hypoproliferative thrombocytopenic (HT) patients with alloimmune transfusion refractoriness require specially selected platelets (PLTs). Cross-matching apheresis PLTs is a popular support option, avoiding requirements for large panels of typed donors for HLA-based selection. We undertook a systematic review of the utility of various cross-matching techniques on mortality reduction, prevention of hemorrhage, alloimmunization and refractoriness, and improvement in PLT utilization or count increments.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A systematic review to December 2012 was conducted of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases along with a bibliographic search of pertinent references.

RESULTS

Of 146 retrieved citations, 20 met inclusion criteria. Eleven more were chosen from bibliographies, describing 29 unique cohorts. All but five enrolled transfusion-refractory, predominantly alloimmunized patients. Cross-match impact on mortality and hemorrhage could not be assessed from these studies. Two studies demonstrated durable corrected count increments and/or breadth of alloimmunization throughout cross-match support; none addressed development or persistence of refractoriness. In alloimmunized refractory patients and nonrefractory cohorts with greater than 25% alloimmunization, higher increments were seen with cross-match-compatible PLTs than incompatible or un-cross-matched units. In two nonrefractory, nonalloimmunized cohorts, the lack of utility of cross-match was reflected by test sensitivity of less than 20%. Comparison of cross-matched PLT success with that of HLA-identical units revealed inferior success rates for the former in one study and equivalent rates in another. No trend was observed regarding relative utility of the various commonly employed techniques.

CONCLUSION

Cross-matched PLTs are useful in increasing PLT counts in alloimmunized, transfusion-refractory HT patients, but data about their impact on hemorrhage and mortality are lacking.

摘要

背景

患有同种免疫性输血难治性的多次输注性低增生性血小板减少症(HT)的患者需要特别选择血小板(PLT)。 血小板单采交叉配型是一种流行的支持选择,避免了对基于 HLA 的选择的大型定型供体面板的要求。 我们对各种交叉配型技术在降低死亡率,预防出血,同种免疫和难治性以及改善 PLT 利用或计数增加方面的实用性进行了系统评价。

研究设计和方法

对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库进行了系统评价,检索时间截至 2012 年 12 月,并对相关参考文献进行了文献检索。

结果

从 146 篇检索到的参考文献中,有 20 篇符合纳入标准。 从参考文献中又选择了另外 11 篇,共描述了 29 个独特的队列。 除了五个以外,所有这些队列都招募了输血难治性,主要是同种免疫的患者。 这些研究无法评估交叉配型对死亡率和出血的影响。 有两项研究表明,在交叉配型支持下,持续的校正计数增加和/或同种免疫广度; 没有一项研究涉及难治性的发展或持续性。 在同种免疫性难治性患者和同种免疫性> 25%的非难治性患者中,与不匹配或未交叉匹配的单位相比,交叉匹配的 PLT 可获得更高的增加。 在两个非难治性,非同种免疫的队列中,交叉配型测试的灵敏度小于 20%反映了交叉配型的缺乏实用性。 与 HLA 相同单位的交叉匹配 PLT 成功率相比,一项研究显示前者的成功率较低,另一项研究则显示等效的成功率。 未观察到各种常用技术相对实用性的趋势。

结论

交叉匹配的 PLT 可有效增加同种免疫性输血难治性 HT 患者的 PLT 计数,但缺乏有关其对出血和死亡率影响的数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验